Here's some potentially VERY good economic news that was lost amid the weekend news flurry.  Those…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Some Potentially VERY Good Economic News

Here's some potentially VERY good economic news that was lost amid the weekend news flurry.  Those with "skin in the game," and who likely possess the best perspective, are betting heavily on an upturn, as highlighted by Friday's Wall Street Journal:

Corporate insiders are buying stock in their own companies at a pact not seen in years, a sign they are betting on a rebound after a coronavirus-induced rout.  More than 2,800 executives and directors have purchased nearly $1.19 billion in company stock since the beginning of March.  That's the third-highest level on both an individual and dollar basis since 1988, according to the Washington Service, which provides data analytics about trading activity by insiders."

Here's why that's important:

Because insiders typically know the…[more]

March 30, 2020 • 11:02 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
The Tax-Shaming Trap Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, August 03 2016
Scrutiny of candidates' tax returns has become a witch hunt, where legitimate business success and standard accounting practices are punished with suspicion.

Hillary Clinton and the media are goading Donald Trump again into releasing his tax returns, suggesting he's unwilling to pay his "fair share." Sadly, even a few of Trump's fellow Republicans are piling on. Their crazy premise: Paying the IRS more than you legally owe makes you a better person. That's nonsense.

Donald Trump is wisely resisting calls to publicly air his tax laundry. He knows releasing his returns would suck him into a media feeding frenzy dragging on right up until Election Day, as opponents and reporters make a federal case out of every line of his returns and clobber him for paying anything less than the maximum rate.

Call the assault "tax shaming"  demonizing high earners who take advantage of perfectly legal opportunities to lower their taxes. It's part of the Democratic Party's class warfare tool kit.

This focus on Trump's personal tax returns distracts from the more important issue: tax reductions needed to jump-start our anemic economy. Yet Clinton and running mate Tim Kaine keep asking crowds to raise their hands if they think Trump is paying enough in taxes. "I don't see a lot of hands," Kaine jokes.

Tax shamers are trying to entangle Trump in the same trap they used successfully against Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential contest. President Obama, running for re-election, ran television ads hammering Romney for relying on "every trick in the book" to pay only 15 percent of his income in taxes  less than half the top rate at the time. Trump's onto the tax shamers' ploy, and even said on Sunday he thinks Romney lost the election because of it.

Monday's New York Times editorial does it again, smearing Trump without even seeing his returns, insinuating the tycoon uses "tax breaks that ordinary voters do not exercise."

Of course they don't  unless they're also real estate moguls building office towers and golf courses. It's a widely accepted best practice in the industry to minimize tax liability by using depreciation allowances, property tax deductions and other write-offs. No competent businessperson would do otherwise.

But tax shaming is one way the political class has rigged the system to discourage outsiders  especially business leaders  from competing for political office. Most politicians don't mind releasing their tax returns because there's so little to see.

Voters can get a clear picture of the choice between Clinton and Trump by looking at the financial disclosures they're legally required to release. Clinton's is a mere 11 pages  almost all speaking fees and royalties from books she wrote about herself. She's in the self-promotion business.

Compare that with Trump's 104-page disclosure. His lists a whopping 185 income-producing business ventures, including office and apartment buildings, resorts and other companies around the world, as well as fees he earns managing other owners' properties. He's a builder and job creator, not just a braggart like Clinton.

Same is true of another business titan who cleverly managed to dodge the tax-return trap: New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

Expecting that his billions in business activities would invite unfair criticism, he refused to disclose his tax rate or how much he paid, and allowed reporters to see only his highly redacted returns and just for a few minutes without making copies. When the press objected that all other candidates were releasing their full returns, he said "That's fine. They don't make anything."

Tax returns disclose how business owners like Bloomberg and Trump make their money. While Hillary Clinton assails Trump for not releasing his tax returns, she's withholding the transcripts of her paid speeches  keeping under wraps what she said to make her money.

Scrutiny of candidates' tax returns has become a witch hunt, where legitimate business success and standard accounting practices are punished with suspicion. So far, Donald Trump's been too smart to take the bait.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Betsy McCaughey is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and author of "Government by Choice: Inventing the United States Constitution."
COPYRIGHT © 2016 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following pandemics caused the largest number of deaths in the 20th Century alone?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"The city of San Francisco is forbidding shoppers from carrying reusable bags into grocery stores out of fear that they could spread the coronavirus.As part of its shelter-in-place ordinance, the California city barred stores from 'permitting customers to bring their own bags, mugs, or other reusable items from home.' The city noted that transferring the bags back and forth led to unnecessary contact…[more]
 
 
—Madison Dibble, Washington Examiner
— Madison Dibble, Washington Examiner
 
Liberty Poll   

Have you or a member of your family contracted coronavirus or are having undiagnosed coronavirus symptoms?