Here's some potentially VERY good economic news that was lost amid the weekend news flurry.  Those…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Some Potentially VERY Good Economic News

Here's some potentially VERY good economic news that was lost amid the weekend news flurry.  Those with "skin in the game," and who likely possess the best perspective, are betting heavily on an upturn, as highlighted by Friday's Wall Street Journal:

Corporate insiders are buying stock in their own companies at a pact not seen in years, a sign they are betting on a rebound after a coronavirus-induced rout.  More than 2,800 executives and directors have purchased nearly $1.19 billion in company stock since the beginning of March.  That's the third-highest level on both an individual and dollar basis since 1988, according to the Washington Service, which provides data analytics about trading activity by insiders."

Here's why that's important:

Because insiders typically know the…[more]

March 30, 2020 • 11:02 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
U.N. Threatens U.S. Medical Innovation...and Our Economy Print
By Timothy H. Lee
Thursday, September 22 2016
Translation: The U.N. seeks to undermine property rights and medical innovation in the name of worldwide redistribution, with the U.S. patent system its obvious primary target.

Ponder this lopsided statistic for a moment. 

The United States, with just 4% of the world's population, generates 64.4% - nearly two-thirds - of all new prescription and biologic drug patents worldwide. 

Our nearest individual competitor, Japan, accounts for a distant second at 10.7%, and China merely 0.2%.  The entire combined European Union produces 24.8%, or about one-third of what we create, with remaining developed nations accounting for only 6.0%. 

That disparity isn't due to blind luck.  It's the direct result of America's current and historical standing as the world's strongest protector of patent rights and intellectual property. 

The U.S. Constitution, whose 229th birthday we celebrate this month, deliberately addressed patent and other intellectual property rights by granting Congress authority "[t]o promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries."  James Madison, writing in The Federalist 43, emphasized the relationship between intellectual property protections and social utility by noting, "The public good fully coincides in both cases with the claims of individuals."  And as Abraham Lincoln later observed, America's "patent system added fuel of interest to the fire of genius." 

But America's strong patent protections aren't mere historical or Constitutional law curiosity.  To this day, independent measures of worldwide intellectual property protections place the U.S. atop their surveys.   As just two examples, both the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Global Intellectual Property Center and the Washington, D.C.-based Property Rights Alliance again placed the U.S. atop their 2016 worldwide rankings. 

The fruits of America's legacy of strong patent protection are clear.  From the telephone to powered flight to radio to television to the Internet, no nation in human history rivals our record of invention.  And as noted above, America's astonishing lead in creating life-saving and life-improving drugs also manifests that legacy. 

One would think that America had earned the world's gratitude for that role as the world's medicinal wellspring. 

Instead, illustrating the old adage that no good deed goes unpunished, the U.S. finds itself the target of United Nations enmity and kleptocratic design. 

Last year, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon convened a "High-Level Panel on Access to Medicines" with the explicit intention "to review and assess proposals and recommend solutions for remedying the policy incoherence between the justifiable rights of inventors, international human rights law, trade rules and public health in the context of health technologies."  In its official statement, the U.N. openly acknowledged its goal of determining "how WTO members can tailor national intellectual property law, competition law, government procurement and drug regulatory laws and regulations to fulfill public health obligations": 

[W]hile the world is witnessing the immense potential of science and technology to advance health care, gaps and failures in addressing disease burdens and emerging diseases in many countries and communities remain.  The misalignment between the right to health on the one hand and intellectual property and trade on the other, fuel this tension.

Translation:  The U.N. seeks to undermine property rights and medical innovation in the name of worldwide redistribution, with the U.S. patent system its obvious primary target. 

The problem, as illustrated by the correlation between America's strong patent system and its gaping lead in medical innovation, is that intellectual property rights don't undermine access to medicine, they fuel it.  Without the incentive to invest in potential new medicines, they simply won't get created in the first place. 

How would weakening that incentive "advance health care," the U.N.'s alleged goal?   How will the U.N. redistribute medicines that don't get invented at all? 

Moreover, in addition to undermining the creative incentive for new medicines, the U.N.'s scheme threatens the American economy. 

Not only do 650,000 Americans work in the pharmaceutical sector, but each of those jobs supports five additional jobs in such sectors as manufacturing, transportation, retail and research.  Additionally, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research, every $1 invested in new medicines saves $7.20 in healthcare spending, which stands to reason since new drugs often alleviate the need for surgery and other expensive treatments. 

It's unfortunate that over the decades, the U.N. has veered far from its founding ideal of promoting world peace among nations and today seems more interested in demonizing Israel or targeting such things as the U.S. right to keep and bear arms.  This latest scheme to free ride off of U.S. medical innovation and weaken its fruitful system of patent rights should not be tolerated by American citizens or their elected leaders. 

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following pandemics caused the largest number of deaths in the 20th Century alone?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
"The city of San Francisco is forbidding shoppers from carrying reusable bags into grocery stores out of fear that they could spread the coronavirus.As part of its shelter-in-place ordinance, the California city barred stores from 'permitting customers to bring their own bags, mugs, or other reusable items from home.' The city noted that transferring the bags back and forth led to unnecessary contact…[more]
—Madison Dibble, Washington Examiner
— Madison Dibble, Washington Examiner
Liberty Poll   

Have you or a member of your family contracted coronavirus or are having undiagnosed coronavirus symptoms?