From AEI, something to remember when we're told that the middle class in America is disappearing. …
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Middle Class Shrinking... In a Good Way

From AEI, something to remember when we're told that the middle class in America is disappearing.  It's disappearing because people are moving upward:

.  

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="1569"] Middle Class Disappearing... Upward[/caption]

 

.  …[more]

August 19, 2019 • 10:12 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Dems' Socialist Ideas Will Tank Economy Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, October 10 2018
These changes will tank the economy and hurt the very workers the party claims to represent.

The most striking difference between Democrats and Republicans is not their views on #MeToo, affirmative action or the Supreme Court. It's how they view the economy. Republicans deplore socialism. But more than half of Democrats view socialism favorably, according to a recent Gallup poll.

The Democratic Party's left flank is turning the midterm elections into a referendum on capitalism. Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, New York congressional candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and dozens of other federal and state candidates protest that our economic system is unjust and needs an overhaul.

They demand radical changes like giving workers control of 40 percent of corporate board seats and making boards serve vague goals of social justice instead of maximizing profits. They're also pushing for huge minimum wage hikes.

These changes will tank the economy and hurt the very workers the party claims to represent. The Democrats' extreme proposals are handing Republicans a powerful election counterattack. At a weekend rally in Kansas City, President Donald Trump slammed Democrats as "an angry left-wing mob" pushing for Venezuela-style socialism.

The left is revving up attacks on capitalism just as workers on the bottom rungs are beginning to benefit from the booming U.S. economy. According to last week's jobs report, unemployment has been pushed back to its lowest level since 1969. Wages in blue-collar industries, such as construction and maintenance, are rising faster than for white-collar workers. Pay for people without a college education jumped almost 6 percent since last year  triple the overall wage gain.

Last week, the stock market, up by 42 percent since Trump was elected, reached record highs. According to Gallop, more than half the nation (54 percent) owns stock or rides the market indirectly through their pensions and 401(k)s. We're a nation of shareholders more than a beleaguered proletariat.

Tell that to Sanders. He waged a blistering attack against Amazon and its subsidiary, Whole Foods, until last week, when the giant retailer buckled and announced a minimum $15 an hour wage for all workers.

Don't worry about Amazon. The giant retailer can pass its costs onto consumers, and is now in a rosy position to lure scarce seasonal workers for Christmas and outperform smaller competitors.

But Amazon employees lose. Amazon canceled performance bonuses and stock awards for hourly workers to offset the minimum wage hike. That replaces a culture where employees who work hard can share in the company's success with an adversarial situation pitting labor against owners. Which is just what Sanders and the left prefers.

The biggest losers are low-skilled job seekers priced out of the market. Large minimum wage hikes result in lost entry-level job opportunities, research shows. Minorities are hit hardest. Having a $10 an hour job and relying on Medicaid and food stamps to get by isn't a perfect life, but it's a start. And it's far better than having no job.

On the other hand, Trump is getting tough on low wages where they hurt American workers the most  in foreign countries. Trump's revised trade agreement with Mexico stipulates that more than 40 percent of auto manufacturing work must be done by workers who earn $16 an hour. Former U.S. presidents bought into the notion that outsourcing production to poor countries promotes global prosperity and equality. True, but low foreign wages undercut American workers. No more.

Meanwhile, Democratic presidential wannabe Elizabeth Warren has introduced the Accountable Capitalism Act, which would give workers control of 40 percent of corporate board seats and a veto over many corporate decisions. It would also compel boards to focus on murky "community and societal factors" instead of maximizing profitability. Investors won't put their money into an enterprise under those conditions. Warren's legislation would cause the stock market to plummet, taking down millions of people's retirements and wiping out the capital needed to create future growth and jobs. Shockingly, this woman wants to be president.

Democrats in favor of socialism need to take a hard look at the results in Venezuela and Cuba. Is that what they want for America?


Betsy McCaughey is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following ships started out as a racing vessel, was fitted out as a slave ship, a Union gunboat and ultimately sank as a commercial vessel?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Federal arrests of non-citizens has increased exponentially over the past two decades, and account for the majority of all federal arrests, data released by the Justice Department revealed.Non-citizens made up 64% of all federal arrests in 2018 despite making up 7% of the U.S. population, according to Justice Department data released Thursday and reviewed by the Daily Caller News Foundation. Between…[more]
 
 
—Jason Hopkins, Daily Caller Immigration and Politics Reporter
— Jason Hopkins, Daily Caller Immigration and Politics Reporter
 
Liberty Poll   

While media attention is most concentrated on federal government issues, how do you rate the performance of your local government?