If President Barack Obama wants to improve income inequality he could start by removing ObamaCare’…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
ObamaCare and Income Inequality

If President Barack Obama wants to improve income inequality he could start by removing ObamaCare’s barriers to working more hours.

“The savings from restricting hours worked can be enormous,” explains the Wall Street Journal. “If a company with 50 employees hires a new worker for $12 an hour for 29 hours a week, there is no health insurance requirement. But suppose that worker moves to 30 hours a week. This triggers the $2,000 federal penalty. So to get 50 more hours of work a year from that employee, the extra cost to the employer rises to about $52 an hour – the $12 salary and the ObamaCare tax of what works out to be $40 an hour.”

Liberals thought themselves clever by dropping full-time status to 30 hours per week from the traditional 40. What they didn’t count on was…[more]

April 24, 2014 • 06:05 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Small Business Shock: 55% Would Not Start a Business in Obama’s Economic Climate Print
By Timothy H. Lee
Thursday, September 27 2012
So small business owners and the general public agree that 'regulation at the federal, state, and local levels are too numerous and costly.'

“The data paints a bleak picture, with a majority of respondents saying in the last three years, the national economy is in a worse position for American small businesses and manufacturers…  The theme of government being a barrier rather than a help is clear throughout this data.”

That was the sobering executive summary of a small business survey conducted over the past month. 

Small businesses, as defined by the federal government, not only account for one-half of all jobs in America but create an even larger two-thirds of its new jobs.  Accordingly, the fears and opinions of small business owners bear particular value to voters in this stagnant economy. 

The survey, conducted by Public Opinion Strategies between August 13 and September 4, 2012, asked 800 small businesses and manufacturers, “Still thinking about your business, given what you know now and in the current economic climate for business, would you start a business today?”  An alarming 55% responded negatively.  Given the pride, blood, sweat and tears that go into owning one’s own business, that speaks volumes. 

Notably, the percentage of negative responses was higher among companies with higher revenues than among those reporting less than $100,000 in revenues.  In other words, lower levels of success or sour grapes did not account for the negative outlook. 

The survey’s other results are just as alarming. 

To scrape out a reelection, Barack Obama argues that despite multiple false promises of a “recovery summer,” he has somehow improved the economic trajectory under his watch.  The small businesspeople on whose shoulders a robust recovery must rest, however, aren’t buying it. 

The survey  asked, “Compared to three years ago, would you say the national economy is in a better or worse position for American small businesses and manufacturers to succeed, or is it in about the same position?”  Of those three options, “worse” was the overwhelming choice.  A 55% to 24% margin replied that conditions have become either “much worse” (35%) or “somewhat worse” (20%), compared to those who said “much better” (6%)  or “somewhat better” (18%). 

Survey respondents also directed particular criticism toward Obama himself. 

Some 69% stated that, “President Obama’s executive branch and regulatory policies have hurt American small businesses and manufacturers,” while only 29% agreed with the statement that, “President Obama’s executive branch and regulatory policies have helped American small businesses and manufacturers.”  A similar 67% majority reported that ObamaCare, the signature act of his tenure, will increase their health insurance costs, whereas only 10% said that it would decrease costs.  Further rebutting Obama’s “I’ve made things better” campaign claim, 55% of survey respondents said that interactions between small businesses and federal regulators have gotten worse, compared to just 13% who said that things have improved.

The survey also revealed troubling insight regarding the Obama Administration and foreign competition. 

By nearly two-to-one, small business owners and manufacturers agreed that “foreign governments with growing economies like China and India are more supportive of their small businesses and manufacturers than the United States,”

But they also reported something even more ominous. 

Respondents were asked, “Thinking again about your company, which of the following has the MOST negative impact on your company’s ability to compete in today’s market?  Is it foreign competitors who receive subsidies and have access to lower operating costs and fewer regulations, or the United States’ own laws, regulations, rules, taxes, and fees that impose unnecessary costs and business impediments?”  Once again, the response margin was nearly two-to-one.  Despite the constant popular drumbeat of foreign competitors that don’t play fair, 62% said that U.S. taxes and regulations had a greater negative impact, compared to 32% who identified foreign competitors as their main headwind. 

These results obviously don’t square with the White House website’s assurance that, “The Administration is committed to providing small businesses support through tax breaks and incentives for investment and growth.”  They do, however, square with a broader Gallup poll of public opinion released this week.  Matching their small business counterparts, the general public by nearly a two-to-one margin believes that there is “too much (47%) rather than too little (26%) government regulation of business and industry.”  That is up sharply from 2008, when 38% of the public believed that there was too much regulation. 

The survey results also reflect Obama’s “You didn’t build that!” slip. 

So small business owners and the general public agree that “regulation at the federal, state, and local levels are too numerous and costly.”  That also explains why, over three years after the last recession officially ended, the Obama “recovery” is the worst in recorded history. 

It’s a dissonance that must be resolved one way or the other on November 6. 

Question of the Week   
How much is the Internal Revenue Service expected to pay out in employee bonuses for fiscal year 2013?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"If foot-dragging were a competitive sport, President Obama and his administration would be world champions for their performance in delaying the approval of the Keystone XL pipeline. ...  Last Friday afternoon, the time when officials make announcements they hope no one will notice, the State Department declared that it is putting off a decision on Keystone XL indefinitely — or at least, it…[more]
 
 
—The Washington Post Editorial Board
— The Washington Post Editorial Board
 
Liberty Poll   

Is ObamaCare “working”?