The U.S. travel technology firm Sabre may not ring an immediate bell, and perhaps you’ve not yet heard…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
On Sabre/Farelogix Merger, DOJ Mustn’t Undertake a Misguided Antitrust Boondoggle

The U.S. travel technology firm Sabre may not ring an immediate bell, and perhaps you’ve not yet heard of its proposed acquisition of Farelogix, but it looms as one of the most important antitrust cases to approach trial since AT&T/Time-Warner. The transaction’s most significant aspect is the way in which it offers a perfect illustration of overzealous bureaucratic antitrust enforcement, and the way that can delay and also punish American consumers. Specifically, the transaction enhances rather than inhibits market competition, and will benefit both travelers and the travel industry by accelerating innovation.  That’s in part because Sabre and Farelogix aren’t head-to-head market competitors, but rather complementary businesses.  While Sabre serves customers throughout the…[more]

January 13, 2020 • 03:53 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
China's Chemical Warfare Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, August 28 2019
China's synthetic opioid factories typically employ hundreds of people seated at internet terminals, openly selling their lethal wares.

President Donald Trump got slammed by all sides  Democrats, the media and European politicians  for suddenly escalating economic war with China on Friday. But for Americans who have lost a family member or friend to the Chinese-made street drug fentanyl, Trump's harsh pivot is the right move.

He hiked tariffs on Chinese goods, labeled President Xi Jinping an "enemy" and told U.S. companies manufacturing in China to pull out. Wall Street went into a tailspin, and partisans called Trump "unhinged."

By Monday, Trump had changed his tone, in response to friendly overtures from China. But the reality is that harsh words and economic threats are what's needed. China has been waging chemical warfare against us for several years, flooding our neighborhoods with poison.

In the last three years alone, fentanyl and similar synthetic opioids manufactured in Chinese labs have killed 79,000 Americans. That's more than the American combatants killed in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq combined. And like those combatants, most fentanyl victims are young.

Chinese-made narcotics started showing up on our streets in 2013, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Each year, overdose deaths soared, but the Obama administration never confronted China to stop its deadly assault.

Trump is fighting back. Instead of soldiers and bullets, he's using tariffs and other economic sanctions. How civilized of him. "We're losing thousands of people to fentanyl," Trump told reporters Friday night. "This is more important than anything else that we're working on."

Trump explained that China's refusal to curb the flood of fentanyl is a major reason for the tariff hikes. Outraged by the tens of thousands of deaths caused by Chinese-made fentanyl, Trump tweeted, "President Xi said this would stop - it didn't."

In fact, China is refusing to cooperate with U.S. law enforcement. Federal authorities have indicted three Chinese drug kingpins who manufacture fentanyl and fentanyl ingredients and use the internet to market the lethal drugs to Americans. China won't extradite the accused to the U.S. and instead is allowing them to continue to operate freely.

Trump's critics, like Bryce Pardo of the RAND Corporation, claim that getting tough with China is futile because China doesn't have the inspectors or law enforcement to shut the poison factories. That's nonsense. A country with the brutal totalitarian apparatus to enforce a one-child policy  which China did for years, dictating what went on in the bedroom  can control what gets sold on the internet and put in the mail. China's synthetic opioid factories typically employ hundreds of people seated at internet terminals, openly selling their lethal wares.

The Obama administration, and many Democrats even now, insist the right strategy is to fund drug treatment programs and expand Medicaid, curbing the demand for killer street drugs rather than cutting off the supply. Actually, we need to do both  attack the supplier and treat the addicts. In war, you don't stop fighting the enemy while you're bandaging the wounded.

For years, the United States Postal Service has been the Chinese drug dealers' shipping method of choice. The feds did nothing until Congress passed a law in 2018 requiring that every package from China be labeled with its content and origin. Still, only about 100 of the 1.3 million packages coming in every day actually get inspected by Customs and Border Protection. Friday, Trump tweeted, "I am ordering all carriers, including Fed Ex, Amazon, UPS and the Post Office, to SEARCH FOR & REFUSE all deliveries of Fentanyl from China." A daunting task.

Some of the Chinese fentanyl supplies are actually shipped to Mexico and then smuggled across the southern border to the U.S. Inspecting packages at that border for fentanyl, a Congressional report concluded, is like "finding a needle in a haystack."

Trump knows that stopping the drugs on our border is less likely to succeed than stopping China from sending them.

Meanwhile, Monday morning, Trump announced that Chinese officials had called U.S. trade officials Sunday night and said, "Let's get back to the table."

Will Trump's hard-line stance on trade stop the drug massacre on America's streets? It's possible. Trump said Monday morning, reflecting on China's change of tone, that the Chinese "understand how life works."


Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was the first African-American soloist to appear at the Metropolitan Opera House in New York City?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Federal prosecutors are scrutinizing whether former FBI Director James Comey leaked classified information about a possible Russian disinformation campaign to journalists, according to a bombshell New York Times report.The inquiry, which kicked off in recent months, appears to focus on information from documents that Dutch intelligence obtained from Russian computers and provided to the U.S. government…[more]
 
 
—Chuck Ross, Daily Caller
— Chuck Ross, Daily Caller
 
Liberty Poll   

Should witnesses be called for the Senate impeachment trial, which could take weeks or even months, or be restricted to the record and evidence already produced by the House?