In this era of increased harassment and persecution of people on the basis of political viewpoints and…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
First Amendment Rights: Good News from the IRS on Donor Privacy

In this era of increased harassment and persecution of people on the basis of political viewpoints and First Amendment expression, there’s actually good news to report.

In fact, that positive development comes from none other than the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which few people typically consider a font of good news.

Specifically, the IRS just announced a proposed rule to stop requiring nonprofit organizations to file what’s known as a Form 990 Schedule B, which exposes sensitive donor information not only to the federal government and potential rogues like former IRS official Lois Lerner, but also people who seek to access and use that information to target people on the basis of political belief.

As we at CFIF have long asserted, this welcome move will help protect the…[more]

September 12, 2019 • 11:07 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
China's Chemical Warfare Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, August 28 2019
China's synthetic opioid factories typically employ hundreds of people seated at internet terminals, openly selling their lethal wares.

President Donald Trump got slammed by all sides  Democrats, the media and European politicians  for suddenly escalating economic war with China on Friday. But for Americans who have lost a family member or friend to the Chinese-made street drug fentanyl, Trump's harsh pivot is the right move.

He hiked tariffs on Chinese goods, labeled President Xi Jinping an "enemy" and told U.S. companies manufacturing in China to pull out. Wall Street went into a tailspin, and partisans called Trump "unhinged."

By Monday, Trump had changed his tone, in response to friendly overtures from China. But the reality is that harsh words and economic threats are what's needed. China has been waging chemical warfare against us for several years, flooding our neighborhoods with poison.

In the last three years alone, fentanyl and similar synthetic opioids manufactured in Chinese labs have killed 79,000 Americans. That's more than the American combatants killed in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq combined. And like those combatants, most fentanyl victims are young.

Chinese-made narcotics started showing up on our streets in 2013, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Each year, overdose deaths soared, but the Obama administration never confronted China to stop its deadly assault.

Trump is fighting back. Instead of soldiers and bullets, he's using tariffs and other economic sanctions. How civilized of him. "We're losing thousands of people to fentanyl," Trump told reporters Friday night. "This is more important than anything else that we're working on."

Trump explained that China's refusal to curb the flood of fentanyl is a major reason for the tariff hikes. Outraged by the tens of thousands of deaths caused by Chinese-made fentanyl, Trump tweeted, "President Xi said this would stop - it didn't."

In fact, China is refusing to cooperate with U.S. law enforcement. Federal authorities have indicted three Chinese drug kingpins who manufacture fentanyl and fentanyl ingredients and use the internet to market the lethal drugs to Americans. China won't extradite the accused to the U.S. and instead is allowing them to continue to operate freely.

Trump's critics, like Bryce Pardo of the RAND Corporation, claim that getting tough with China is futile because China doesn't have the inspectors or law enforcement to shut the poison factories. That's nonsense. A country with the brutal totalitarian apparatus to enforce a one-child policy  which China did for years, dictating what went on in the bedroom  can control what gets sold on the internet and put in the mail. China's synthetic opioid factories typically employ hundreds of people seated at internet terminals, openly selling their lethal wares.

The Obama administration, and many Democrats even now, insist the right strategy is to fund drug treatment programs and expand Medicaid, curbing the demand for killer street drugs rather than cutting off the supply. Actually, we need to do both  attack the supplier and treat the addicts. In war, you don't stop fighting the enemy while you're bandaging the wounded.

For years, the United States Postal Service has been the Chinese drug dealers' shipping method of choice. The feds did nothing until Congress passed a law in 2018 requiring that every package from China be labeled with its content and origin. Still, only about 100 of the 1.3 million packages coming in every day actually get inspected by Customs and Border Protection. Friday, Trump tweeted, "I am ordering all carriers, including Fed Ex, Amazon, UPS and the Post Office, to SEARCH FOR & REFUSE all deliveries of Fentanyl from China." A daunting task.

Some of the Chinese fentanyl supplies are actually shipped to Mexico and then smuggled across the southern border to the U.S. Inspecting packages at that border for fentanyl, a Congressional report concluded, is like "finding a needle in a haystack."

Trump knows that stopping the drugs on our border is less likely to succeed than stopping China from sending them.

Meanwhile, Monday morning, Trump announced that Chinese officials had called U.S. trade officials Sunday night and said, "Let's get back to the table."

Will Trump's hard-line stance on trade stop the drug massacre on America's streets? It's possible. Trump said Monday morning, reflecting on China's change of tone, that the Chinese "understand how life works."


Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
On September 11, 2001, the United States was attacked by terrorists using which one of the following?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"There's an old joke often expressed well into banquets and conferences, where a speaker says, 'We're at the point where everything that needs to be said has been said, but not everyone has said it.' We're already at that point with the Democratic primary debates. Tonight was a three-hour ordeal, and candidates largely repeated the arguments they made in the previous two debates. There's not much…[more]
 
 
—Jim Geraghty, National Review
— Jim Geraghty, National Review
 
Liberty Poll   

Is the desire to withdraw American troops from Afghanistan in conflict with the lessons of September 11, 2001?