We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
WSJ Urges Regulators to Approve T-Mobile/Sprint Merger

We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger, and cautioned the federal government against any pointless and destructive objection to the deal.  In today's Wall Street Journal, its editorial board encourages the Department of Justice (DOJ) to move forward on the deal:

The Justice Department lost its lawsuit to block AT&T's purchase of Time Warner.  Yet now the antitrust cops are holding up T-Mobile's merger with Sprint even though it could give AT&T more competition in wireless.  What gives?

A year ago, T-Mobile announced plans to acquire Sprint for $26 billion in stock, yet the merger is still stuck in government antitrust purgatory.  The Federal Communications Commission keeps pausing its 180-day shot clock on the merger…[more]

April 22, 2019 • 04:07 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Leftists Expand Their War Into All Corners of Society Print
By Timothy H. Lee
Thursday, September 20 2018
Google's longstanding negative influence in American politics is obvious, but a disturbing number of other large companies have joined its crusade to interrupt consumers' ability to purchase perfectly legal goods.

"You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you." 

Although ironically spoken by communist Soviet Union founding father Leon Trotsky, that observation is one that contemporary conservatives and libertarians in America would be wise to heed. 

The simple reality is that from judicial appointments to pop culture, from schools to restaurants, from sports to internet searches, to nearly everything in contemporary life, the political left is waging an ideological war.   So conservatives and libertarians may not be interested in the politicization of all things, but the left's politicization of all things is interested in them. 

This week provided yet another tawdry textbook illustration, when a last-minute allegation of teen sexual misconduct against Judge Brett Kavanaugh  an allegation that Senator Dianne Feinstein (D - California) apparently felt happy to conceal for months  suddenly interrupted his confirmation process.  Keep in mind that Judge Kavanaugh has been nominated to fill the same Supreme Court seat for which the late Judge Robert Bork was nominated in 1987, when the left commenced its infamous ruthless effort to stop his confirmation, for which conservatives and libertarians were wholly unprepared. 

The previous week, the sports world endured yet another flare-up of the Colin Kaepernick saga, when the washed-up former quarterback who remains a hero to the left despite his habit of wearing socks depicting police as pigs and praising actual oppressor Fidel Castro, appeared in a Nike commercial.  One can't even watch a football game or select shoes anymore without descending into the politicized swamps. 

More ominously, that same expanding leftism has entered social realms of greater consequence to everyday Americans, including internet searches and banking. 

Silicon Valley titan Google constitutes perhaps the most negative corporate force in American politics, from its constant efforts to undermine intellectual property (IP) protections (unless someone is allegedly infringing on Google's IP, of course, such as with Uber's self-driving automobile program) to pushing so-called "Net Neutrality" during the Obama Administration.  That latter effort led to the first decline in private broadband investment outside of a recession. 

More recently, Google has endured justifiably withering criticism for appointing itself gatekeeper of the internet, by filtering what American consumers can and cannot access on their supposedly "neutral" sites.  As just some recent examples, it banned The New York Conservative blog, it lowered sites supporting Britain's "Brexit" and expressing skepticism toward the European Union in its search results, it blocked the Gab free speech social network from its Google Play Store, its YouTube censored mild-mannered conservative commentator Dennis Prager and his "Prager U" video primers and it even excluded Donald Trump from searches for "presidential candidates." 

Back in July, Google also directly targeted the firearms industry by revising its Google Pay policy to prohibit apps that sell firearms and related accessories.  Given Google's sheer market dominance, that ideologically driven new policy doesn't just artificially limit consumer choice, but also targets an entirely legal industry that manufactures or sells firearms and related products. 

A month after Google's new policy took effect, GunBroker.com CEO and CTO Steve Urvan was informed that the company's app had been blocked from Google Pay because of an alleged "Violation of Dangerous Products" policy. 

And now, video has surfaced showing Google's leadership expressing disgust in the wake of Donald Trump's electoral victory.  Google founder Sergey Brin even proclaims, "I certainly find this election deeply offensive."  Clearly, one of the world's most powerful companies now disfavors entire portions of the American population, along with entirely legal commerce and Second Amendment rights enshrined in the very text of the Constitution. 

Google's longstanding negative influence in American politics is obvious, but a disturbing number of other large companies have joined its crusade to interrupt consumers' ability to purchase perfectly legal goods.  This past April, for instance, Bank of America abruptly discontinued banking services to manufacturers of immensely popular and effective AR-15-style rifles. 

Similarly, Citigroup imposed a nationwide policy precluding its commercial and institutional clients, small business clients and credit card partners from selling firearms of any type to citizens under 21 years old, even though the legal age remains 18.  The company also now refuses to serve any business that manufactures magazines exceeding ten rounds, and is considering monitoring consumer gun purchases through its internal payment mechanisms. 

Hello, Big Brother. 

All of this illustrates how leftist politics have increasingly contaminated the private economy, where politicized and powerful businesses target First Amendment, Second Amendment and other rights of everyday Americans. 

It hasn't worked out well for Dick's Sporting Goods, whose sales and market value fell after targeting Second Amendment rights earlier this year.  And it hasn't worked out well for the National Football League, whose ratings continue to drop as fans lose interest and avoid the increasingly politicized spectacle. 

But hey  perhaps the third time's the charm for Nike. 

As private businesses, these market giants are free to pursue their leftist brand of politics.  But they should at least acknowledge their efforts rather than attempting to conceal them. 

And more importantly, American consumers should remain aware of what they're up to. 


Question of the Week   
How many times in our nation’s history has a presidential election been decided by the U.S. House of Representatives?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
"President Donald Trump opened a new flank in his battle against illegal immigration on Monday when he ordered his administration to crack down on 'visa overstays' -- foreigners who legally enter the country but remain in the U.S. after their visas expire.The president signed a memorandum ordering the secretary of state and the secretary of homeland security to submit plans within four months to crack…[more]
—Alan Gomez, USA TODAY
— Alan Gomez, USA TODAY
Liberty Poll   

How likely are you to read all or a significant part of the Mueller Report?