From the mild-mannered yet oft-censored Dennis Prager, for anyone feeling undertaxed or who advocates…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: Anyone Thinking We're Undertaxed?

From the mild-mannered yet oft-censored Dennis Prager, for anyone feeling undertaxed or who advocates even higher taxes:

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="960"] Anyone Feeling Undertaxed?[/caption]

 

 

 

 …[more]

May 17, 2019 • 09:36 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Democrats Keep Trying to Cover Up Their Anti-Semitism Print
By David Harsanyi
Friday, March 08 2019
Democrats' draft measure condemning anti-Semitism is a useless and transparent attempt to distract from a serious problem of their own creation.

Rep. Ilhan Omar argues that American "democracy is built on debate," tweeting, "I should not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve my country in Congress or serve on committee." I'm sure no decent person disagrees with her comment. Also, every sane person understands this is merely a deflection from Omar's many anti-Semitic comments.

No one asked her  or anyone else  to pledge allegiance to a foreign nation. It's her belief that supporting the Jewish state, a longtime ideological and geopolitical ally of the United States, is an act of dual loyalty  either by Jews or by others who, as Omar might say, have been "hypnotized" to do "evil." She is the one who accuses Jewish Americans, a group that has played a robust role in the nation's civic life for a long time, of doing the bidding of a foreign power to the detriment of their own.

Just as no one is forcing Omar to take a position on Israel  much less pledge allegiance to it  no one is attacking her right to free speech. This isn't Eritrea  a country Omar recently visited and was quite impressed by  where a dictatorship can arrest and torture citizens for taking unpopular positions. If Omar's moral compass tells her to advocate for terrorists and theocrats, she's free to do so. Americans are likewise free to point it out.

But Democrats' draft measure condemning anti-Semitism is a useless and transparent attempt to distract from a serious problem of their own creation. The decree mentions Alfred Dreyfus, Leo Frank, Henry Ford and "anti-Muslim bigotry"  because hey, even when Jews are being smeared, it's about Islamophobia  but not once does it condemn Omar or the strain of hatred she is helping normalize on the left. The resolution, teeming with useless platitudes, is one that even Omar could probably support.

It's also worth remembering that it was only after a handful of Jewish Democrats, such as Eliot Engel, objected to Omar's comments that House Speaker Pelosi was forced to act  or rather, pretend to act. Even now, a number of pundits on the left, including columnists for The Washington Post and The Atlantic, argue that Omar  as well as fellow anti-Semite Rep. Rashida Tlaib  operates within the parameters of acceptable debate. Omar could read portions of the Hamas Charter into the Congressional Record, and The New York Times would tell us her "latest remarks on Israel draw criticism."

Another tactic taken up by Democrats is trolling for supposedly anti-Semitic comments by Republicans to deflect and dilute the attention on Omar. This week, Democrats found one such straw man when the ranking member of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, Jim Jordan, spelled liberal donor Tom Steyer's name with a dollar sign in a tweet. Liberals across the media quickly took up the cause: "Gee whiz, what if Ilhan Omar had done this?!"

Well, if Omar had inserted a dollar sign into the name of a Jewish donor, considering her history, we'd have to assume she was clumsily trying to make another bigoted comment. There's absolutely nothing anti-Semitic about calling out Steyer  and other billionaires who spend millions every cycle helping political causes. Steyer, perhaps more than anyone, in fact, is known for advocating the impeachment of Donald Trump. So when House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler issued document requests from 81 people and organizations in a massive trolling investigation for "obstruction," Jordan reacted as people in both political parties tend to do, by accusing the other party of being bought by big donors and special interests.

Moreover, Steyer grew up with a non-practicing Jewish dad and became involved in the Episcopal Church when he was 40. I certainly had no idea that "$teyer" had any Jewish background. His surname isn't Jewish. He's not a supporter of Jewish causes. If anything, he's been a longtime supporter of anti-Israel candidates and organizations.

But Democrats, who hear dog whistles at every mention of "globalist," can't get their ire up when one of their own drops tropes that date back to at least "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion."

Congress, of course, really has no business setting guidelines for acceptable political speech. Pelosi does, however, have the power to name committee appointees. And with this power, she decided to place a doltish hater of Jews, someone with radical positions and absolutely no relevant experience, on the House Foreign Affairs Committee to appease the growing anti-Israel contingent in her party.

She did this knowing about Omar's history of anti-Semitic tweets, radicalism and support of Hamas. Last week, Pelosi was mugging on the cover of the celebratory issue of Rolling Stone with Omar and her bestie, apologist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. These, claims the magazine, are "women shaping the future." If so, that will be Pelosi's legacy.


David Harsanyi is a senior editor at The Federalist and the author of the book "First Freedom: A Ride Through America's Enduring History With the Gun." 
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
What event occurs annually in the U.S. on the third Saturday in May?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Former Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos said Thursday that the FBI tried to get his wife to wear a wire to 'entrap' him and that he thinks Congress 'probably has transcripts' of meetings he had that prove he was spied on by the FBI.'Besides the FBI trying to have my then-girlfriend, now wife, actually wear a wire to try to entrap me herself -- which was completely crazy -- she was an Italian…[more]
 
 
—Victor Garcia, Fox News
— Victor Garcia, Fox News
 
Liberty Poll   

In 2018, it is estimated that 47 billion robocalls were made to U.S. landlines and cell phones, now trending even higher. How many robocalls do you estimate you receive each week?