Among the myriad missteps and abuses of the Obama Administration, its habit of rogue lawmaking through…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Congress Making Good On Rescinding Rogue "Privacy" Regulations Rammed Through by Obama's FCC

Among the myriad missteps and abuses of the Obama Administration, its habit of rogue lawmaking through unelected administrative agencies rather than the deliberative democratic process was perhaps the worst.  Even the most liberal Supreme Court justices on several occasions agreed, striking down Obama Administration regulatory impositions by unanimous votes.

And perhaps no federal agency represented that lawlessness and impropriety better than the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

Last year as the clock began to expire on the Obama era, the FCC moved to impose new "privacy" regulations upon private Internet Service Providers (ISPs), upon which Americans rely to access the internet.  Those regulations actually did nothing on behalf of consumer privacy, or to prevent online data…[more]

March 22, 2017 • 09:56 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Puff! The Tragic Dragonless Leadership Print
By Quin Hillyer
Wednesday, January 25 2012
If the nation is at risk, then Republicans must get it right.

The utter fecklessness of top conservative office-holders is stunning. Faced with what most of them call a make-or-break, now-or-never election, most of them are so brave, so ready to meet the moment, so willing to step up to the plate… that they sit on the sidelines, quaking in their boots, afraid to make a stand because they don’t want to risk even a bit of their own political capital.

Here they are, these mighty men of steel, these women who pretend to be of Thatcherite iron. They fulminate against The One Obama, leader of Occupy the Oval Office. They say the country can’t survive four more years with him in the West Wing. They say the nation’s economy will collapse if we don’t fix the budget soon. The apocalypse approacheth.

But they won’t lead.

They think they see an extremely weak Republican field for president. But none of them will run. None of them will endorse somebody who does have the guts to run. And none of them will even announce that any one candidate is unacceptable. Instead, they just, well, wait. They watch. They hope. And they make excuses.

They remind me of the yellow dog Mustard, the black kitten Ink, and the little mouse Blink, from Ogden Nash’s “The Tale of Custard the Dragon”. These three brave critters and their owner, Belinda, endlessly teased their cowardly friend the dragon.

Belinda was as brave as a barrel full of bears,
And Ink and Blink chased lions down the stairs,
Mustard was as brave as a tiger in a rage,
But Custard cried for a nice safe cage.

So they reveled in their courage, yes they did, while making fun of their “realio, trulio, cowardly dragon.”

At least that’s what they did until a fierce and deadly pirate, intent on mayhem, climbed through the window:

Belinda paled, and she cried Help! Help!
But Mustard fled with a terrified yelp,
Ink trickled down to the bottom of the household,
And little mouse Blink strategically mouseholed.

So, too, have our supposed leaders strategically mouseholed. Ask almost any of them in private, and I guarantee they’ll say they are worried sick about what will happen, for instance, if Newt Gingrich is the party’s presidential nominee. They are sure Obama will crush him, certain he’ll stop Republicans from winning the Senate, and convinced he seriously threatens, and maybe even guarantees, the loss of the House as well. Yet they still won’t budge. They have budgets to draft, and PACs to administer, and committee-assignment ambitions, and vice presidential dreams.

Oh, yes, those vice presidential dreams. You see, if they are conservatives themselves, well, they can’t endorse another strong conservative, because if that conservative wins he might want a moderate to balance the ticket – which would rule them out. But they can’t endorse a moderate, not even to suck up to him for vice presidential purposes, because by doing so it would kill their conservative “street cred” and thus undermine their appeal to the very audience the moderate might want their help appealing to.

Oh, what a predicament! Oh, what pressure! Oh, the humanity!

Oh, what a crock.

If the nation is at risk, then Republicans must get it right. If Obama is such a danger, then he must be beaten. And if one candidate is substantively better, personally more trustworthy, and/or a much more likely candidate to offer a bigger electoral upside than downside, then the leader should endorse him. Or, if the converse is true about any particular candidate, then make a strong, unambiguous, “Anybody-But-This-Guy” statement – and then back it up. Explain it. Defend it. Persuade people you are right.

Granted, there is such a thing as a hierarchy of endorsements. Many endorsements don’t carry much weight. Then again, some do. Some carry a lot of weight. Some people have considerable stature. Some people really can move voters.

And they know who they are. Somebody in the position to move a lot of voters is a smart enough politician to know he’s in such a position. He (or she) knows that he (or she) carries weight. A good politician knows his own muscle…..

…. Wait… What?.... You want me to name names?.... You wanna know who are these top-tier politicos of whom I speak? You want me on the record calling them cowards?

You gotta be kidding. I might lose a source. They might not give me any more interviews. … Come on, where is that mousehole when I need it?!?

What we really need right now is another Custard. In the Ogden Nash poem, the dragon was only cowardly until faced with a menace. But when Belinda needed protection, the kindly dragon ate the pirate. Isn’t there among conservative leaders at least one beneficent dragon who will save the day?

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following do Presidents Jimmy Carter, Andrew Johnson, William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor all have in common?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"So here we are with gallons of ink, forests of trees and gigabytes of pixels being spent on one single tweet where Mr. Trump regurgitated press accounts reporting that the Obama administration used electronic surveillance to investigate Mr. Trump's campaign. That claim is incontrovertibly accurate. The hardest and clearest evidence of this is that Mr. Trump's national security adviser and former…[more]
 
 
—Charles Hurt, The Washington Times
— Charles Hurt, The Washington Times
 
Liberty Poll   

President Trump’s new budget proposal increases defense spending by $54 billion, to be paid for with significant cuts to the State Dept. and lesser cuts to domestic agencies. Generally, do you approve or disapprove of that approach?