CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed "Net Neutrality…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.  Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite latenight comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="760"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 18, 2024 • 11:47 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
How to Escape Obamacare Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, August 17 2016
Meanwhile, some Obamacare advocates are calling for draconian increases in the penalty for not signing up 'to compel more people to meet their responsibility.' Ouch.

"You get what you pay for," the adage goes. Not with the Affordable Care Act. When open enrollment starts Nov. 1, the public will see they're going to be paying lots more for health insurance in 2017 and getting less. Across the country, state insurance departments are announcing double digit premium hikes, often as high as 20 percent and occasionally even 40 percent.

People who earn too much to qualify for a subsidy will be forced to pay as much as a fifth of their income for health insurance. And they'll get less choice of doctors and hospitals and less prescription drug coverage.

Annual enrollment begins eight days before voters go to the polls. Donald Trump is vowing to repeal Obamacare. Hillary Clinton is doubling down on keeping and expanding it. Democrats are worried Obamacare sticker shock will have an 11th hour impact on the election.

They should worry. Affordability was a phony claim from day one. The law requires everyone without coverage to buy the insurance industry's product or get clobbered with a big penalty. Most consumers get taxpayer-funded subsidies and see only a fraction of the true cost. And insurers get year-end lump sum payments from the government to encourage them to under-price their plans. But only through this year. In 2017, after Obama leaves office, that corporate welfare ends  a major reason why premiums will be skyrocketing.

It's an expensive and deceptive scheme  with taxpayers footing the bill  to make the plans look "affordable," as the law's title falsely claims.

The public wasn't fooled. Twenty-two million were predicted to enroll by 2016, but only half that number did.

Young healthy people decided that the Washington-knows-best benefit package, packed with features they didn't need, was a rip-off. Who wants to pay for pediatric dental coverage or routine colonoscopies when you're 30 and single? Mostly older, sicker people tended to sign up, causing insurers to incur big losses  some $3 billion a year.

Democrats are telling the public not to worry about soaring premiums, because they'll still be getting their subsidies and won't feel the pain. That's true for 80 percent of Obamacare customers. But beleaguered taxpayers will feel the pain. They're paying for the subsidies, which are already costing 50 percent more per person than predicted when the law was passed. And the Congressional Budget Office predicts the cost will double again by 2025.

Also feeling the pain, big time, are Obamacare customers who earn too much to qualify for a subsidy. Individuals earning more than $47,500 and couples more than $64,080 will be whacked with the full premium hike. Already, they're forced to pay as much as 18 percent of after-tax income and it's about to get worse. A big difference from Obama's promise they'd be saving $2,500 a year.

Is there an escape? In many states, yes. Millions of people are opting to pay the Obamacare penalty (2.5 percent of adjusted gross income) and then buy bargain insurance. These plans are temporary, not necessarily renewable, and limit what you can collect if you're sick. But they're cheap.

The administration tried to ban them but lost in federal court in July. Now they're trying another regulation to prevent consumers from buying low-cost insurance.

Meanwhile, some Obamacare advocates are calling for draconian increases in the penalty for not signing up "to compel more people to meet their responsibility." Ouch.

Hillary Clinton isn't commenting on penalties, but when she first proposed universal healthcare in 1993, she told Congress she'd consider automatically enrolling those who failed to sign up and garnishing their wages if they didn't pay. Yikes.

There is a way out. If you don't want Obamacare rammed down your throat, vote Republican in November.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Betsy McCaughey is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and author of "Government by Choice: Inventing the United States Constitution."
COPYRIGHT © 2016 CREATORS.COM

Notable Quote   
 
"Soon the government might shut down your car.President Joe Biden's new infrastructure gives bureaucrats that power.You probably didn't hear about that because when media covered it, few mentioned the requirement that by 2026, every American car must 'monitor' the driver, determine if he is impaired and, if so, 'limit vehicle operation.'Rep. Thomas Massie objected, complaining that the law makes government…[more]
 
 
— John Stossel, Author, Pundit and Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you mostly approve or mostly disapprove of U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson's plan to introduce foreign aid packages for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan before legislation on U.S. border security?