Here's some potentially VERY good economic news that was lost amid the weekend news flurry.  Those…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Some Potentially VERY Good Economic News

Here's some potentially VERY good economic news that was lost amid the weekend news flurry.  Those with "skin in the game," and who likely possess the best perspective, are betting heavily on an upturn, as highlighted by Friday's Wall Street Journal:

Corporate insiders are buying stock in their own companies at a pact not seen in years, a sign they are betting on a rebound after a coronavirus-induced rout.  More than 2,800 executives and directors have purchased nearly $1.19 billion in company stock since the beginning of March.  That's the third-highest level on both an individual and dollar basis since 1988, according to the Washington Service, which provides data analytics about trading activity by insiders."

Here's why that's important:

Because insiders typically know the…[more]

March 30, 2020 • 11:02 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Stop Penalizing Obamacare Victims Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, September 07 2016
More people are paying NOT to have Obamacare than are signing up for it.

On Inauguration Day, the next president of the United States should suspend the penalty for being uninsured under the Affordable Care Act. President Obama promised his law would provide an array of affordable health plans. In 2017, consumers will get neither choice nor affordability. In nearly one-third of the nation, only one insurer will offer coverage  that's no choice at all. And premiums are skyrocketing everywhere. Obamacare is broken. Slapping Obamacare refuseniks with hefty penalties (averaging almost a thousand dollars) for not signing up is as unjust as enforcing a parking ticket when the meter was broken.

Consumers will be clobbered starting Nov. 1, the beginning of open enrollment. They'll want to know what Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton intend to do about it, especially in in swing states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and New Hampshire, where premiums are rising as much as 30 to 40 percent. In many parts of Florida, another must-win state, consumers will be forced to sign up for the only insurer in town or get hit with the penalty.

Giant insurers Aetna, UnitedHealth and Humana are exiting most Obamacare exchanges after losing billions trying to sell the unpopular plans. Wherever only one insurer remains, all patients on Obamacare will be funneled into that single remaining insurer's network of doctors. That will make it nearly impossible to get a doctor's appointment.

Worse, many of these remaining insurers are primarily in the Medicaid business. Obamacare will mean paying soaring premiums for Medicaid-level access to care. What a deal.

In Illinois, most Obamacare premiums are going up 51 percent before subsidies. In Tennessee, it's 62 percent.

Individuals earning more than $48,000 and couples earning more than $64,000 have to pay full freight. It's highway robbery.

From the start, Obamacare has made financial sense only for two groups: the very sick or those eligible for a free ride. That's why more than 11 million people a year are opting to pay penalties instead of buying in. Amazing. More people are paying NOT to have Obamacare than are signing up for it.

Now, with premiums soaring and choices disappearing, even more people will say "no," predicts industry expert Robert Laszewski.

These people shouldn't get penalized. The same law that imposes the penalty promised them choice and affordability -- and is reneging on both.

Does a president have the power to suspend the penalty? Yes. I am not suggesting the next president go rogue, like Obama himself did, changing the law 43 times without asking Congress. Only Congress can make or change law. But the Section 5000A hardship exemptions give the next president a legal opening. Stratospheric premiums and deductibles and lack of choice are hardships for sure.

Laszewski warns that dropping the penalty "would only make the system implode faster." True, because the young and healthy will be under no pressure to pay for a raw deal. But why should these individuals be sacrificed to prop up "the system"?

The collapse of the Affordable Care Act plans is good riddance. Twenty million people have gained coverage under the ACA, but the lion's share is enrolled in Medicaid, not in private plans. Those plans cover at most 8 million people who were previously uninsured  a small gain compared with the 11 million who pay the penalty and 5 or so million who had insurance they liked and were forced to give up for Obamacare.

One of Obamacare's chief architects, Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, calls for stiffer penalties on the uninsured. Princeton professor Uwe Reinhardt recommends the U.S. copy how European countries crack down on the uninsured, including garnishing wages. Yikes. Sounds like what Hillary Clinton recommended in 1993, when she proposed her failed health care plan. (And no doubt it's what she'd try again.)

But Americans don't want to be Europeanized, and they won't march lockstep into an insurance scheme that takes away their choices. Let's hope the next president is listening.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Betsy McCaughey is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and author of "Government by Choice: Inventing the United States Constitution."
COPYRIGHT © 2016 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following pandemics caused the largest number of deaths in the 20th Century alone?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"The city of San Francisco is forbidding shoppers from carrying reusable bags into grocery stores out of fear that they could spread the coronavirus.As part of its shelter-in-place ordinance, the California city barred stores from 'permitting customers to bring their own bags, mugs, or other reusable items from home.' The city noted that transferring the bags back and forth led to unnecessary contact…[more]
 
 
—Madison Dibble, Washington Examiner
— Madison Dibble, Washington Examiner
 
Liberty Poll   

Have you or a member of your family contracted coronavirus or are having undiagnosed coronavirus symptoms?