In an excellent piece in today's Wall Street Journal, Scott Atlas of Stanford University highlights…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Want to Address Drug Costs? Avoid Price Controls, Eliminate PBMs and Don't Weaken Patents

In an excellent piece in today's Wall Street Journal, Scott Atlas of Stanford University highlights how Americans enjoy far greater access to new lifesaving drugs than patients in Europe and elsewhere, and how the movement to impose government price controls would only restrict access to new drugs and degrade Americans' health outcomes, as we at CFIF have been emphasizing:

America has superior treatment results for virtually all serious diseases reliant on drug treatment, including cancer, heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure and diabetes.  Price controls would jeopardize that advantage...

Pegging drug prices to those of foreign countries, as both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have proposed, would ultimately lead to the same consequences Europeans endure - reduced access…[more]

February 14, 2019 • 05:20 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
VA Mission Act Won't Help Dying Vietnam Vets Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, June 13 2018
If there was ever an example of vets needing to be in the driver's seat about getting outside care, this is it.

Tens of thousands of Vietnam vets, now in their sixties and early seventies, are carrying a dangerous parasite picked up in Asia called liver fluke. Many don't know it, but it's a ticking time bomb likely to kill them.

President Donald Trump just signed the VA Mission Act, which is supposed to help ailing vets get prompt care, including seeing a civilian doctor on Uncle Sam's tab. Don't count on it to help these vets.

The fine print shows that vets are guaranteed nothing. The Department of Veterans Affairs secretary is simply empowered to make rules for who gets civilian care. Though Trump and his pick for secretary, Robert Wilkie, favor making it easy for vets, Wilkie's rules could last only as long as Wilkie remains secretary. Worse, they don't go into effect for two and a half years, too late for many Vietnam vets with liver fluke.

Scandalously, the VA is doing zip to identify and treat these infected vets, even though an ultrasound test can detect liver fluke infection in minutes and medications can slow its progression into lethal bile duct cancer. If there was ever an example of vets needing to be in the driver's seat about getting outside care, this is it. But the VA Mission Act requires them to get their VA doctor's permission.

Remember the nation's shock in 2014 when 40 vets died on secret waitlists concocted by VA bureaucrats. That toll is minuscule compared with the deaths being caused right now by the VA's neglect of vets with liver fluke.

In January, researchers at the Northport, New York, VA found that one out of every four vets tested who remembers eating raw fish in Vietnam  a common practice when rations ran out  is carrying the parasite. More than 100,000 veterans could be infected. The parasite lingers in the body for decades, and then  wham  suddenly could cause deadly bile duct cancer. Some 80 percent to 90 percent of veterans will develop the cancer if their infection goes untreated, according to New York physician John Cahill, an expert on parasites.

"It's a huge number," says Devi Nampiaparampil, associate professor at New York University Langone Medical Center.

Cahill says he'd like to see every vet who ate raw fish while in Vietnam contacted for an ultrasound.

Instead, the VA is serving up gibberish. When researchers documented the link between Vietnam vets eating raw fish and getting infected with liver fluke, the VA posted a statement that "there is currently no evidence that vets have higher infection rates than the general population." That's ridiculous. You can't get infected with liver fluke in the U.S. The parasite doesn't exist here. Cahill calls bile duct cancer "extremely rare" among the U.S. population. The other highest risk group is Asian-Americans who traveled or once resided in Southeast Asia.

Here's another whopper. The VA is telling vets if they don't have jaundice or other symptoms "they don't need screening." In fact, Nampiaparampil stresses that by the time those symptoms appear, the cancer has often progressed too far.

The VA claims there is "no definitive link" between the parasite and cancer. In truth, there's a pile of research linking the two. Researchers at Tulane and George Washington University proved the link in 2007 in an article "Liver Fluke Induces Cholangiocarcinoma." So did findings in the journal Cancer Science in 2010, calling liver fluke infection "the strongest risk factor" for cancer of the bile duct.

The VA is launching a "large-scale epidemiological study" that will be ready in about two years.

Meanwhile Facebook and local newspapers are chronicling the deaths of Vietnam vets from liver fluke-related cancer.

The clock is ticking. Vietnam vets need to be contacted, tested if they ate raw fish, and treated if they have the infection. The VA Mission Act isn't going to save them any more than previous VA "reform" laws  all hailed by self-congratulating Washington pols when they were passed.


Betsy McCaughey is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths. 
COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
How many votes need to be cast in the affirmative in order to expel a member of Congress from either Chamber?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Amazon does not need New York City. There are many advantages to operating in a city such as New York, which offers experiences and opportunities that well-paid tech-company executives are not going to find in such business-friendly alternatives as Houston or Las Vegas. But Amazon has decided that these are not worth the price of admission, which in this case would be subjecting itself to a political…[more]
 
 
—Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
 
Liberty Poll   

Given the hard-left turn of Democratic Party leaders and many rank-and-file elected officials, how do you think Democrats will fare in 2020 elections?