In an excellent piece in today's Wall Street Journal, Scott Atlas of Stanford University highlights…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Want to Address Drug Costs? Avoid Price Controls, Eliminate PBMs and Don't Weaken Patents

In an excellent piece in today's Wall Street Journal, Scott Atlas of Stanford University highlights how Americans enjoy far greater access to new lifesaving drugs than patients in Europe and elsewhere, and how the movement to impose government price controls would only restrict access to new drugs and degrade Americans' health outcomes, as we at CFIF have been emphasizing:

America has superior treatment results for virtually all serious diseases reliant on drug treatment, including cancer, heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure and diabetes.  Price controls would jeopardize that advantage...

Pegging drug prices to those of foreign countries, as both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump have proposed, would ultimately lead to the same consequences Europeans endure - reduced access…[more]

February 14, 2019 • 05:20 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Short-Term Insurance Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, August 15 2018
[T]he middle class is becoming the new uninsured.

Democrats are trying to ban low-cost health insurance that will cover less than Obamacare. They claim they're protecting the public from what Senator Chuck Schumer calls "junk insurance." Don't believe it.

In truth, they're sabotaging middle-class consumers who've been priced out of Obamacare and dread being uninsured. Somebody needs to remind the Democratic Party that poor lives matter but so do middle-class lives.

The Affordable Care Act requires all health plans to cover a whopping 10 categories of medical care that Washington politicians deem "essential." Everything from maternity care (even if you're in your 50s) to substance abuse treatment.

It's like passing a law that the only car you can buy is a fully loaded four-door sedan. Some people need wheels and can only afford a Mitsubishi hatchback or a motorcycle.

Likewise, if you need health insurance, basic coverage without the costly extras sure beats being uninsured.

Trouble is, Obamacare is a budget buster. Premiums for 2019 will be about triple what they were six years ago. Not a problem for buyers who get subsidized by Uncle Sam. But it's a big problem if you earn more than $48,560 individually or $65,840 as a couple and can't get a subsidy.

One out of every 5 of these unsubsidized Obamacare customers dropped their insurance last year and went uncovered, a trend predicted to worsen this year. Not that Schumer and the rest of Congress feel the pain. They get their own sweetheart deal.

Meanwhile, the middle class is becoming the new uninsured.

Enter President Trump. On Aug. 1, the Trump administration announced regulatory changes that will allow sticker-shocked consumers to buy "short-term" health plans without costly extras, such as newborn care and pediatric dental coverage, that are mandatory in Obamacare plans. The short-term plans, which can last three years, will cost less than half what Obamacare costs, in some cases only a quarter as much. Six-hundred thousand consumers are expected to snap up these lower-cost plans in the first year, with two million expected by 2023.

Disregard panicky predictions that consumers who don't read the fine print will get a rude awakening. Trump's regulations require exclusions to be spelled out in huge typeface no one can miss. Buyers will know what they're not getting before they sign up.

How about Nancy Pelosi's rants about "junk" coverage? False. These low-cost plans will probably provide better access to hospital and doctors than Obamacare plans, which often exclude specialty hospitals like MD Anderson Cancer Center in Texas and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York and include only doctors who take bargain-basement Medicaid fees.

Schumer tries to claim people with pre-existing conditions will be harmed because their Obamacare premiums will rise as healthy people leave for less costly alternatives. Sorry, Senator, that's another whopper. According to America's Health Insurance Plans, the impact will be nearly imperceptible  less than 2 percent.

Never mind hard facts. The Democratic Party is determined to outlaw low-cost alternatives to Obamacare. They're taking their battle to the states, which have the authority to ban these plans inside their own borders. Hawaii, Maryland, Connecticut and Washington state recently slammed the door on them. California is expected to follow. Consumers in most states will be free to buy low-cost options, thanks to the Trump regulatory change, but not in these health insurance gulags.

Sadly, New York is the worst. Consumers here have the least freedom of choice and pay practically the highest premiums in the U.S. Even before Obamacare, New York legislators pandered to interest groups by requiring that all plans cover a huge range of services. Here's how it works: Lobbyists get paid by chiropractors, infertility experts and other interest groups to push for mandatory coverage, and state legislators rake in contributions and accolades for going along with it. Everybody wins but John Q. Consumer, the middle-class schlemiel who gets clobbered when he buys insurance.

Meanwhile, people who live in states with more health insurance freedom save thousands of dollars a year.


Betsy McCaughey is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
How many votes need to be cast in the affirmative in order to expel a member of Congress from either Chamber?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Amazon does not need New York City. There are many advantages to operating in a city such as New York, which offers experiences and opportunities that well-paid tech-company executives are not going to find in such business-friendly alternatives as Houston or Las Vegas. But Amazon has decided that these are not worth the price of admission, which in this case would be subjecting itself to a political…[more]
 
 
—Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
 
Liberty Poll   

Given the hard-left turn of Democratic Party leaders and many rank-and-file elected officials, how do you think Democrats will fare in 2020 elections?