We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
WSJ Urges Regulators to Approve T-Mobile/Sprint Merger

We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger, and cautioned the federal government against any pointless and destructive objection to the deal.  In today's Wall Street Journal, its editorial board encourages the Department of Justice (DOJ) to move forward on the deal:

The Justice Department lost its lawsuit to block AT&T's purchase of Time Warner.  Yet now the antitrust cops are holding up T-Mobile's merger with Sprint even though it could give AT&T more competition in wireless.  What gives?

A year ago, T-Mobile announced plans to acquire Sprint for $26 billion in stock, yet the merger is still stuck in government antitrust purgatory.  The Federal Communications Commission keeps pausing its 180-day shot clock on the merger…[more]

April 22, 2019 • 04:07 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Trump's Plan to Stop the Caravan Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, November 28 2018
Even Hillary Clinton acknowledges that 'Europe needs to get a handle on migration because that is what lit the flame' of populism. That's a stunning admission that open border policies are a failure.

President Donald Trump is putting the economic screws to Mexico to control the flood of Central American migrants storming our southern border. Unlike prior presidents, Trump is driving a hard bargain. Exports are Mexico's economic lifeblood. A staggering 81 percent of those exports go to the United States. That's why Trump's threat to close the border  even for a short time  gets results. Shutting the border shuts down Mexico. Period.

No wonder Mexico's incoming president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, seems open to a "Remain in Mexico" deal that will make his country the waiting room for migrants applying for asylum in the U.S. In another sign of cooperation with Trump, Mexican immigration officials rapidly deported 98 migrants who tried forcing their way into the U.S. on Sunday.

Under "Remain in Mexico," asylum-seekers would be held south of the border. Because they won't step foot on American soil, they won't have a "right" to public schooling, emergency health care and other costly American guarantees. That's good news for taxpayers.

Making Mexico the waiting room is one part of Trump's plan. Trump also announced on Nov. 9 that only migrants presenting themselves at official border entrances  not those sneaking in  could apply for asylum. Trump's trying to solve the catch-and-release problem. Migrants caught crossing illegally simply have to say the word "asylum" to border agents, and voila, they're released. They disappear into the U.S. and half never actually file for asylum or show up for a hearing. They're turning asylum into a farce.

Unfortunately, a federal judge in San Francisco, Judge Jon S. Tigar, put a temporary hold on Trump's policy. In a laughable decision likely to be overturned, Tigar said Honduran and Guatemalan migrants miles south of the U.S. border can sue the president of the United States, via an American third party, challenging his policy and asserting a right to enter the U.S. illegally. Sure, and pigs can fly.

Tigar's ruling prompted a spat between Trump and Chief Justice John Roberts, who chastised the president for calling Tigar an "Obama judge." Roberts is right about judicial independence, but he sure picked the wrong poster boy for it. Tigar is an activist with a history of outlandish decisions, including compelling taxpayers to foot the bill for sex reassignment surgery for a prison inmate.

Despite the spat, the chief justice is squarely on Trump's side, not Tigar's, when it comes to the president's authority over immigration. In June, Roberts ruled that federal immigration law "exudes deference to the president in every clause."

Still, get ready for more legal obstruction. The American Civil Liberties Union plans to sue over any "Remain in Mexico" deal, arguing that leaving migrants "stranded in Mexico would inevitably put people in danger."

What about endangering American interests? The ACLU is mum about how schools and social services are strained when immigrant families flood American towns illegally.

Just ask Europeans about uncontrolled migration. The public there is outraged over the 1.8 million refugees from North Africa and the Middle East who have overwhelmed Europe since 2014. European leaders are belatedly barring the door. They're pushing for the very same remedy Trump is negotiating with Mexico  keeping the migrants waiting in distant North African facilities while their applications are processed.

Even Hillary Clinton acknowledges that "Europe needs to get a handle on migration because that is what lit the flame" of populism. That's a stunning admission that open border policies are a failure.

She ought to have the courage to deliver that message to Democrats here, starting with Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, chairman-to-be of the House Oversight Committee. Cummings is adamant the caravan migrants "should be allowed to come in, seek asylum" even if they've crossed the border illegally. He vows to torpedo Trump's "Remain in Mexico" plan, insisting the current situation on the southern border "has worked for a long time."

Worked? Maybe for pandering Democratic politicians, but not for the nation.


Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
How many times in our nation’s history has a presidential election been decided by the U.S. House of Representatives?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"President Donald Trump opened a new flank in his battle against illegal immigration on Monday when he ordered his administration to crack down on 'visa overstays' -- foreigners who legally enter the country but remain in the U.S. after their visas expire.The president signed a memorandum ordering the secretary of state and the secretary of homeland security to submit plans within four months to crack…[more]
 
 
—Alan Gomez, USA TODAY
— Alan Gomez, USA TODAY
 
Liberty Poll   

How likely are you to read all or a significant part of the Mueller Report?