We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
WSJ Urges Regulators to Approve T-Mobile/Sprint Merger

We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger, and cautioned the federal government against any pointless and destructive objection to the deal.  In today's Wall Street Journal, its editorial board encourages the Department of Justice (DOJ) to move forward on the deal:

The Justice Department lost its lawsuit to block AT&T's purchase of Time Warner.  Yet now the antitrust cops are holding up T-Mobile's merger with Sprint even though it could give AT&T more competition in wireless.  What gives?

A year ago, T-Mobile announced plans to acquire Sprint for $26 billion in stock, yet the merger is still stuck in government antitrust purgatory.  The Federal Communications Commission keeps pausing its 180-day shot clock on the merger…[more]

April 22, 2019 • 04:07 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Trump on Strong Legal Ground to Stop Caravan Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, November 07 2018
Amazingly, attorneys for six Hondurans in the caravan sued the Trump administration last week for violating their constitutional rights. History shows they don't have a legal leg to stand on.

Former President Barack Obama is ridiculing President Donald Trump and other Republicans for vowing to stop the caravan of 4,000 Central American migrants heading toward our border. Republicans are "trying to convince everybody to be afraid of a bunch of impoverished, malnourished refugees," Obama says. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi blasts Republicans for stoking "baseless fear" for political purposes.

Baseless fear? Democrats aren't leveling with you about the welfare, health benefits and education resources these migrants will consume, if they're allowed in. Democrats are also claiming the U.S. has to let the migrants in, because they're seeking asylum. The truth is, the U.S. Constitution and federal law give the president the authority to block their entry.

Trump's critics portray migrants as families fleeing for their lives. Don't believe it. Few are legitimate asylum seekers. Mexico launched a "Make Yourself at Home" program, offering migrants shelter, food, work and schools for their kids. Most turned it down. They're heading to the U.S. for a lifestyle upgrade, knowing that uttering the words "asylum" and "credible fear" to a U.S. border agent is a get-in-free card.

More than half never apply for asylum, according to Attorney General Jeff Sessions. They just melt into the interior of the U.S. Of those who apply, only a miniscule 8.3 percent qualify. These migrants are making a mockery of asylum.

Trump is halting this hoax. At the White House last Thursday, he previewed an executive order expected this week. Step one: targeting migrants who cross the border illegally.

Every month, thousands wade across the Rio Grande or scale fences, and then plead asylum if they're apprehended by a border agent. They're taken into custody briefly, released and told to appear at an immigration hearing. Surprise: They almost never do. Trump announced an end to this "catch and release" fiasco. Soldiers are laying barbed wire to deter illegal crossings, but those who get through will be detained in tent cities until their claims are heard.

Amazingly, attorneys for six Hondurans in the caravan sued the Trump administration last week for violating their constitutional rights. History shows they don't have a legal leg to stand on.

In 1981, President Ronald Reagan deported those trying to enter illegally and claim asylum. Reagan called the attempted mass migration "detrimental to the interests of the United States." Attorneys for the sea-faring migrants sued, but the U.S. Supreme Court backed up Reagan, ruling that the executive branch has the "discretion" to grant or not grant asylum (Sale v. Haiti Centers Council, Inc.). Illegal immigrants do not have a constitutional right to come in, period. Even to seek asylum. Whether they're on boats or in caravans.

What about migrants who line up at official border entrances instead of sneaking in? Trump skirted the issue on Thursday, but he has the authority to deny them entry. Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act gives the president broad discretion, even in the case of refugees and asylum seekers. Last year, in Trump v. Hawaii, the Supreme Court confirmed that the president can turn away aliens who are "detrimental to the interests of the United States."

Using that test, who can doubt the right thing to do? Already, there are 22 million illegal immigrants in the U.S., according to new research by Yale and MIT statisticians  double what is commonly acknowledged. Federal taxpayers pay billions of dollars a year to fund community health clinics primarily used by illegal immigrants, while local taxpayers foot school bills for their children.

When migrant children lacking English skills and school experience are placed in public schools here, they drain off enormous resources. Too bad for the rest of the kids. Worse, dozens of Central American migrant children have been arrested as "suspected gang members" of the violent MS-13 street gang, according to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

How can anyone dismiss the problems migrants are bringing to our nation? "Detrimental" is an understatement.


Betsy McCaughey is a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2018 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
How many times in our nation’s history has a presidential election been decided by the U.S. House of Representatives?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"President Donald Trump opened a new flank in his battle against illegal immigration on Monday when he ordered his administration to crack down on 'visa overstays' -- foreigners who legally enter the country but remain in the U.S. after their visas expire.The president signed a memorandum ordering the secretary of state and the secretary of homeland security to submit plans within four months to crack…[more]
 
 
—Alan Gomez, USA TODAY
— Alan Gomez, USA TODAY
 
Liberty Poll   

How likely are you to read all or a significant part of the Mueller Report?