The House of Representatives made history today when it passed a bill allowing Congress to sue the President…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
House Passes Bill to Sue Obama

The House of Representatives made history today when it passed a bill allowing Congress to sue the President of the United States for failing to implement a federal law, reports the L.A. Times.

The legislation authorizes House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) to file suit in federal court demanding that President Barack Obama enforce ObamaCare’s employer mandate, which requires companies with 50 or more full-time workers to purchase ObamaCare-compliant health insurance or pay a penalty.

House Republicans have been critical of President Obama’s unilateral delays in enforcing the mandate – now scheduled to go into effect in 2016 – because it spares Democrats and the Obama administration substantial political pain. If the law is so great, Republicans reason, then it should go into full…[more]

July 31, 2014 • 01:10 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Failure to Defend the Border Abandons American Citizens Print
By Ashton Ellis
Tuesday, April 19 2011
Whatever one thinks about the particulars in the immigration enforcement approach adopted by Arizona and seconded by Georgia and other states, one truth is undeniable. Failure to secure the border will only exacerbate tensions in American communities abandoned by the federal government.

Lost amid the legal wrangling over whether states like Arizona have the constitutional right to enforce federal immigration laws is a far simpler question: Is the United States government’s refusal to secure the border an abandonment of American citizens? 

For those living on the nation’s edge, reality is inescapable. 

In testimony to Congress on April 15th, Arizona rancher Jim Chilton recounted the toll paid by American citizens living in the “no man’s land” between the border and enforcement.

“The Border Patrol reported to the Government Accountability Office that by October 2010 it had control of 873 miles of the nearly 2,000 miles of the Southwest border, or 44%.  This is not an acceptable situation for those of us who live along the other thousand-plus miles, nor is it a reassuring report when one considers that terrorists and criminals both have enormous areas through which they can pass.”

Chilton went on to describe how Mexican drug traffickers have twice broken into his home on their way back from drop-offs.  A neighbor has been burglarized ten times.  A few years prior, Chilton and others were informed that seven backpacks were found with Yemeni passports a few miles from his house. 

It’s safe to say that neither the drug traffickers nor the intruders carrying passports from an al-Qaeda stronghold fit the profile of Mexican migrants looking for work. 

Yet, according to Chilton, it remains official Border Patrol policy to let illegal aliens travel between 20 and 70 miles into American territory before attempting to make contact.  For perspective, the upper range makes Tucson, AZ, America’s new southern border. 

What about those like Chilton who are left to defend America’s ‘no man’s land’ ceded by the federal government? 

Armed with the latest versions of binoculars, motion sensors and GPS devices, drug cartels can easily pinpoint Border Patrol movements and maneuver smugglers around them. 

Of course, that kind of perpetual monitoring extends to locals like Chilton as well. 

Now, every member of Chilton’s U.S.-based ranch operation keeps a firearm within reach to protect from foreign nationals trespassing with impunity. 

Members of Congress are finally showing signs that securing the border is a predicate to discussing amnesty for illegal immigrants. 

In an April 13th press release, Arizona Republican Senators Jon Kyl and John McCain acknowledged that while “over half a million illegal immigrants are apprehended border-wide each year,” conservative estimates place the total number of illegal border crossings to at least one million per annum.   To plug the leak, Kyl and McCain want to fund more Border Patrol agents and National Guardsmen. 

Utah Republican Representative Rob Bishop points to another problem: environmental regulations that slow down the Border Patrol, but not illegal immigrants. 

Because much of the southwestern border is covered by various national park and environmental designations, enforcement agencies like the Border Patrol must conduct Environmental Impact Studies before beginning operations.  Amazingly, national security grounds are not sufficient to overcome the environmental criteria set forth in the regulations. 

Stymied by eco-bureaucrats, Border Patrol agents – and citizens like Chilton – must watch helplessly as drug traffickers and terrorists roll into America on a green carpet. 

Seven times in his testimony, Chilton demanded a simple commitment from Congress: Control the Border at the Border. 

Whatever one thinks about the particulars in the immigration enforcement approach adopted by Arizona and seconded by Georgia and other states, one truth is undeniable.  Failure to secure the border will only exacerbate tensions in American communities abandoned by the federal government. 

The real question confronting policymakers isn’t whether to secure the border – it’s whether a nation can claim sovereignty over land it no longer defends.   

Question of the Week   
Which of the following merged to form the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) within the Department of Homeland Security?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Immigration has emerged as perhaps President Obama's worst issue -- definitely for today, and maybe of his entire presidency -- when it comes to public perception.A new poll from AP-GfK shows more than two-thirds of Americans (68 percent) disapprove of Obama's handling of the immigration issue in general. Just 31 percent approve -- down from 38 percent two months ago.When you separate those most…[more]
 
 
—Aaron Blake, The Washington Post
— Aaron Blake, The Washington Post
 
Liberty Poll   

Is significant, proven plagiarism sufficient to disqualify, in the minds of voters, any candidate for public office?