One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
To Get More Federal Money, States Claiming Volunteer Organizations are a Form of Welfare Spending

One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence that states lay down tough work requirements for welfare recipients as a condition of receiving federal assistance. Though the fact is little publicized, however, another provision of the law allows states to substitute increased welfare spending for the work requirements and still receive money from Washington. That, of course, is an invitation to mischief, as reported by CNSnews, quoting Congressman Geoff Davis

"Many States have scoured their budgets to find other current program spending--such as for Pre-K, child care, and after school programs--they could report as TANF [welfare] spending," Davis said at a hearing on Thursday. "Others began counting third-party spending--such…[more]

May 22, 2012 • 01:24 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Free Market Groups Urge Passage of Repatriation Legislation This Year
Free Market Groups Urge Passage of Repatriation Legislation This Year Print
Wednesday, November 30 2011

In a letter to House Speaker John Boehner, 30 free market organizations, including the Center for Individual Freedom, urged enactment of legislation this year enabling American companies to “repatriate” as much as $1.4 trillion in overseas earnings into the U.S. economy.

As the letter notes, “The U.S. is one of the only countries that taxes income earned overseas by her own taxpayers.”  As a result, American-based companies are incentivized to keep those foreign earnings overseas rather than bringing it back and investing it in the U.S. economy. 

The idea of allowing U.S. companies to repatriate income earned in other countries at a more efficient tax rate than is currently available enjoys bipartisan support in Congress.  “For the sake of job creation here at home and as a down payment on fixing our broken and anti-competitive tax laws, we urge you to enact repatriation before the year is over,” the letter reads.

The letter, which was organized by Americans for Tax Reform, can be read here or below:


November 30, 2011

The Honorable John Boehner
Speaker of the House
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

Dear Speaker Boehner:

It is very likely that Congress will pass a tax revenue bill before the end of this calendar year.  We write to you today to urge that this bill include a provision allowing U.S. employers to “repatriate” money from overseas back home to the United States.

The U.S. is one of the only countries that taxes income earned overseas by her own taxpayers.  A French company earning a profit in the United States pays taxes to the IRS, but never has to pay tax to the French authorities.  An American company earning a profit in France, however, must pay tax to the French government, and then pay an additional tax to the IRS should they want to bring that money back to the United States.  The amount that must be paid to the IRS is the difference between the U.S. corporate income tax rate of 35% (tied for highest in the developed world), and the tax already paid overseas.  Most of the time, this means that employers looking to bring capital back to the United States must pay an additional tax to the IRS of well over 10 percent, and in some cases as high as 35 percent.

Not surprisingly, this punitive tax treatment incentivizes companies to keep earnings overseas.  Today, $1.4 trillion is sitting in foreign bank accounts, effectively unable to come to America because of this anti-competitive tax treatment.  Industry estimates calculate that alleviating this tax burden in 2012 will result in a capital inflow to the United States of at least $800   billion.  That’s non-inflationary, non-stimulus wealth flowing into the country in order to create jobs and invest in America.

This was tried in 2005, and the results were successful.  Over $300 billion flowed into America that year as a result of repatriation.  Because a small tax of 5.25% was imposed, the Treasury received a revenue windfall of nearly $20 billion.  Should a similar repatriation opportunity exist in 2012, it’s reasonable to expect $800 billion to flow into the United States with a Treasury revenue windfall of over $40 billion.

Over time, the U.S. must move from a “worldwide” tax regime that seeks to tax U.S. employers all over the world.  Instead, we should adopt a “territorial” regime which only seeks to tax profits earned within the United States.  This is the system our global competitors use, and it’s an essential step toward making our country a good place to create jobs and do business. Repatriation is a good step in the direction of territoriality, and should be seen as progress toward that goal.

For the sake of job creation here at home and as a down payment on fixing our broken and anti-competitive tax laws, we urge you to enact repatriation before the year is over.

Sincerely,

60 Plus Association, Jim Martin, Chairman

American Family Business Institute, Dick Patten, President

American Values, Gary L. Bauer, President

Americans for Prosperity, Phil Kerpen, Vice President

Americans for Tax Reform, Grover Norquist, President

CatholicVote.org, Brian Burch, President

Center for Individual Freedom, Jeffrey L. Mazzella, President

Citizen Outreach, Chuck Muth, President

Citizens for Limited Taxation, Chip Faulkner, Associate Director

Citizens for the Republic, Bill Pascoe, Executive Vice President

Club for Growth, Chris Chocola, President

Coalition for a Fair Judiciary, Kay R. Daly, President

Competitive Enterprise Institute, Iain Murray, Vice President

ConservativeHQ, Richard A. Viguerie, Chairman

Cost of Government Center, Mattie Duppler Corrao, Executive Director

Council for Citizens Against Government Waste, Thomas Schatz, President

Florida Center Right Coalition, Richard Watson, Chairman

Free Congress Foundation, James S. Gilmore III, President and CEO

Frontiers of Freedom, George Landrith, President

Georgia Center Right Coalition, Louie Hunter, Chairman

Hispanic Leadership Fund, Mario H. Lopez, President

Institute for Policy Innovation, Tom Giovanetti, President

Less Government, Seton Motley, President

Let Freedom Ring, Colin A. Hanna, President

National Center for Public Policy Research, Amy Mortiz Ridenour, President

National Taxpayers Union, Duane Parde, President

Small Business and Entrepreneurship Council, Karen Kerrigan, President and CEO

Taxpayer Protection Alliance, David Williams, President

The Heartland Institute, Eli Lehrer, Vice President

U.S. Chamber of Commerce, R. Bruce Josten, Executive Vice President

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following men did the Chicago Tribune describe as: “a bullheaded man whose high place … was won by his ability to waste more money in quicker time on more absurd undertakings?”
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"This week Catholic bishops are heading to federal courts across the country to defend religious liberty. On Monday they filed 12 lawsuits on behalf of a diverse group of 43 Catholic entities that are challenging the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) sterilization, abortifacient and birth-control insurance mandate. ...  The main goal of the mandate is not, as HHS claimed, to protect…[more]
 
 
—Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
— Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?