One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
To Get More Federal Money, States Claiming Volunteer Organizations are a Form of Welfare Spending

One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence that states lay down tough work requirements for welfare recipients as a condition of receiving federal assistance. Though the fact is little publicized, however, another provision of the law allows states to substitute increased welfare spending for the work requirements and still receive money from Washington. That, of course, is an invitation to mischief, as reported by CNSnews, quoting Congressman Geoff Davis

"Many States have scoured their budgets to find other current program spending--such as for Pre-K, child care, and after school programs--they could report as TANF [welfare] spending," Davis said at a hearing on Thursday. "Others began counting third-party spending--such…[more]

May 22, 2012 • 01:24 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Coalition to U.S. Senate: No More Obama Nominees Until Pres. Secures Resignations of Unconstitutional “Recess” Appointments
Coalition to U.S. Senate: No More Obama Nominees Until Pres. Secures Resignations of Unconstitutional “Recess” Appointments Print
Monday, January 30 2012

Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) President Jeffrey Mazzella this week joined with more than 50 conservative organization leaders in a letter calling on all U.S. Senators “to prevent the consideration and approval of any further nominations unless and until President Obama secures the resignations of the individuals he unconstitutionally appointed earlier this month.”

The letter is in response to President Obama’s January 4, 2012, “recess” appointments of Richard Cordray to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Sharon Block, Terence Flynn and Richard Griffin to the National Labor Relations Board. 

As the letter notes, “According to Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, the President is required to obtain the advice and consent of the Senate for his appointments. A narrow exception to that requirement allows the President to ‘fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate.’

“However, the Senate was not in Recess… In fact, the House of Representatives did not consent to the Senate taking a Recess, and therefore, the Senate was in a pro forma session.  Not only did the President make appointments without the advice and consent of the Senate, but he appointed one, Richard Cordray, whom the Senate had previously rejected.”

To read the letter, click here (.pdf).

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following men did the Chicago Tribune describe as: “a bullheaded man whose high place … was won by his ability to waste more money in quicker time on more absurd undertakings?”
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"This week Catholic bishops are heading to federal courts across the country to defend religious liberty. On Monday they filed 12 lawsuits on behalf of a diverse group of 43 Catholic entities that are challenging the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) sterilization, abortifacient and birth-control insurance mandate. ...  The main goal of the mandate is not, as HHS claimed, to protect…[more]
 
 
—Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
— Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?