Below is one of the latest cartoons from two-time Pulitzer Prize-winner Michael Ramirez. View…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
The Recount

Below is one of the latest cartoons from two-time Pulitzer Prize-winner Michael Ramirez.

View more of Michael Ramirez’s cartoons on CFIF’s website here.…[more]

December 08, 2016 • 11:08 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Letter: CFIF Urges Reform of Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Broadband Loan Program
Letter: CFIF Urges Reform of Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Broadband Loan Program Print
Monday, May 06 2013

In a letter sent to the United States Senate, the Center for Individual Freedom today urged the preservation of common-sense amendment provisions within S. 10, the pending Farm Bill, that bring much-needed reform to the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Broadband Loan Program -- a program  plagued by widespread redundancy, fraud and waste of taxpayer dollars.

Read the full letter below.


May 6, 2013 

United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Senator:

On behalf of over 300,000 supporters and activists across the nation, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) urges you to help preserve common-sense amendment provisions within S. 10, the pending Farm Bill, that bring much-needed reform to the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Broadband Loan Program. 

Specifically, we ask you to support the amendment sponsored by Senator Mark Warner (D – Virginia), which was adopted by the Senate during consideration of last year’s Farm Bill, and which would bring substantive reform to the RUS by requiring that at least 25% of households in an applicant’s proposed service area not have access to broadband.  Congress originally intended in creating the RUS that its funds be used for “eligible rural communities in which broadband service is not available to residential customers.”  Unfortunately, however, the program instead misdirects significant resources to areas that already possess broadband service. 

Moreover, investigations in recent years, including an audit from the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Inspector General (IG), have revealed that the RUS is plagued by widespread redundancy, fraud and waste.  According to the IG’s February 2011 testimony, in 2004 “159 of the 240 communities associated with the loans (66 percent) already had preexisting broadband service.”  That, in turn, led the IG to note that the practice “could create an uneven playing field for providers already operating without Government subsidies,” and ask the rhetorical question: “Why should one provider be given a Government loan or grant when another provider offers service without that assistance?” 

By ignoring the unserved areas, the RUS is wasting precious taxpayer dollars and neglecting remaining rural areas where broadband service doesn’t yet exist.  In an era of record deficits and debt, as well as regulatory dysfunction, that simply cannot continue.  In the absence of eliminating RUS altogether, CFIF therefore encourages Congress to bring critical reform to the program. 

The Warner amendment was included in S. 10, the new Farm Bill iteration introduced in January 2013, and we ask that you help ensure that it remains, including outreach to Committee on Agriculture Ranking Member Thad Cochran to maintain it in the base language.  At a minimum, all RUS applicants should demonstrate that their proposed services will cover areas that don’t already possess existing broadband providers. 

Thank you very much for your attention to this extremely important matter. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Timothy H. Lee 
Sr. Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs 

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was the first U.S. President to fly in a modified jet airplane specifically built for presidential use?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"[H]e didn't believe what he was saying. Reid's perspective changed dramatically after a Democratic president was elected and had the exact same trouble in the Senate. He 'went nuclear' to help Obama, but history will record that in invoking the nuclear option, he actually freed the hand of President-elect Trump to appoint anyone he wanted to any executive branch position and to most federal judgeships…[more]
 
 
—The Editors, Washington Examiner
— The Editors, Washington Examiner
 
Liberty Poll   

Which one of the following finalists would you favor to win the “Baracki,” a totally fake and fictitious award for the most fabulous fake news of 2016?