Among the foremost threats to individual freedom in America is the abusive and oftentimes lawless behavior…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
More Legal Shenanigans from the Biden Administration’s Department of Education

Among the foremost threats to individual freedom in America is the abusive and oftentimes lawless behavior of federal administrative agencies, whose vast armies of overpaid bureaucrats remain unaccountable for their excesses.

Among the most familiar examples of that bureaucratic abuse is the Department of Education (DOE).  Recall, for instance, the United States Supreme Court’s humiliating rebuke last year of the Biden DOE’s effort to shift hundreds of billions of dollars of student debt from the people who actually owed them onto the backs of American taxpayers.

Even now, despite that rebuke, the Biden DOE launched an alternative scheme last month in an end-around effort to achieve that same result.

Well, the Biden DOE is now attempting to shift tens of millions of dollars of…[more]

March 19, 2024 • 08:35 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Press Room CFIF Joins Coalition Demanding Defeat of Crony “RAWA” Bill
CFIF Joins Coalition Demanding Defeat of Crony “RAWA” Bill Print
Friday, September 25 2015

The Center for Individual Freedom this week joined a coalition of a dozen influential free-market organizations to urge Congress to oppose the Restoration of America’s Wire Act ("RAWA"), legislation that would override state laws related to Internet gaming and the sale of lottery tickets. The letter, addressed to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Robert Goodlatte and organized by the Center for Freedom and Prosperity, urges respect for the 10th Amendment right of states to set their own gaming rules.

Read the letter below or view a PDF version here.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

September 24, 2015

Dear Chairman Goodlatte:

We appreciate your steadfast support of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution and your leadership in the face of constant threats from both political parties. We wish more Members of Congress devoted as much energy and attention to the Constitution as you do.

You will no doubt be placed under enormous pressure by vested interests pushing H.R. 707, the Restoration of America's Wire Act (RAWA). We also understand and respect your long-standing opposition to gambling. That said, politics and one's personal views should not trump the ability of states to regulate their own affairs.

RAWA is an outright assault on federalism. The legislation tramples on the Tenth Amendment by banning state regulation of online gambling – further chipping away at the balance between state and federal governance. The bill would overturn state laws already on the books in three states and would prohibit states from selling lottery tickets online for their own constituents – rolling back at least another six state laws.

The Tenth Amendment was designed to protect states from the unmitigated power of the federal government, because a government powerful enough to tell states they cannot have Internet gaming for their residents is also powerful enough to one- day force gaming on the states. Weakening the Tenth Amendment today will do permanent damage to it.

Earlier this year at a Judiciary Committee hearing on RAWA, you rightly acknowledged there is a states' right dynamic to this issue and suggested that the Congressional effort to update the Wire Act "will need to address how to handle both the states that have already enacted laws allowing online gambling and any states that would want to do so in the future."

Let's be honest – this is not possible. Proponents of the legislation are seeking to rollback state laws and prohibit other states from exercising their constitutional authority. Period. Anything less will be considered a failure. It has also come to our attention that some in Congress are proposing a “gaming moratorium” which would grandfather existing states that have passed laws while prohibiting other states from exercising their rights under the Tenth Amendment. Make no mistake about it, a moratorium is as much an assault on the Tenth Amendment as an outright ban.

We encourage you to continue to stand up for the Constitution, the Tenth Amendment, and the ability of the states to regulate their own affairs. We assume there will be a last ditch effort prior to the 2016 elections to see this provision enacted into law, perhaps as part of a larger spending package. We urge your continued principled opposition to the Las Vegas rent-seekers pushing for this measure. This bill is an assault on the constitutional values we all hold dear.

Sincerely,

Andrew F. Quinlan, President Center for Freedom and Prosperity
Michelle Minton, Fellow Competitive Enterprise Institute
Thomas Schatz, President Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
Dan Schneider, Executive Director The American Conservative Union
David Williams, President Taxpayers Protection Alliance
Seton Motley, President Less Government
Andrew Moylan, Executive Dir. R Street Institute
Carrie Lukas, Managing Director Independent Women's Forum
Bob Bauman, Chairman Sovereign Society Freedom Alliance
Norm Singleton, Senior VP, Ron Paul’s Campaign for Liberty
Heather R. Higgins, President Independent Women's Voice
Jeffrey Mazzella, President Center for Individual Freedom

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"Americans do not trust several major U.S. institutions, including the national news media.The recently released Center Square Voters' Voice poll found that 43% of Americans say the media is trustworthy, compared with 54% who said it is not trustworthy.Younger people were more likely to trust the media, with 47% of those ages 18-34 saying they trust it and 46% saying the opposite.The numbers steadily…[more]
 
 
— Casey Harper, The Center Square
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately reject the new Biden administration automobile emissions rule as beyond the scope of administrative agency authority?