CFIF has long championed greater fairness for recording artists and protection of intellectual property…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
CFIF Strongly Opposes Senator Ron Wyden's "ACCESS to Sound Recordings" Act

CFIF has long championed greater fairness for recording artists and protection of intellectual property (IP) rights in the music industry.   Among other problems, current law generally protects recording artists' rights for post-1972 songs, but not pre-1972 classics:

. Under byzantine laws, artists receive just compensation whenever their post-1972 recordings are played, but in many cases not for their pre-1972 recordings.  That's an indefensible and arbitrary artifact that has persisted far too long.  Why should Neil Diamond receive payment whenever 'America' is played, but not classics like 'Solitary Man?'

Fortunately, the opportunity to correct that unfairness has arrived.  Even better, legislation to correct the existing flawed system arrives alongside other music legislation…[more]

June 18, 2018 • 11:43 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Poll: Maine Voters Want Congress to Address Internet Privacy and Transparency Far More Than Just "Net Neutrality"
CFIF Poll: Maine Voters Want Congress to Address Internet Privacy and Transparency Far More Than Just "Net Neutrality" Print
Thursday, February 08 2018

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) released a poll of Maine voters examining consumer concerns related to the internet, finding that consumers in the state ultimately prefer comprehensive legislation to protect all of their internet activity rather than congressional action that simply reinstates the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) old "net neutrality" rules.

Notably, 82% of the respondents say they have become more concerned about the privacy of their information on the internet.  In line with those sentiments, Maine voters want Congress to act on legislation that helps ensure consumers are protected and treated fairly by all internet companies – Internet Service Providers (ISPs), search engines and social media companies – along with the principles broadly identified as "net neutrality."

That support transcends partisan affiliation, registering approval by 57% of Democrats, 57% of Republicans and 56% of Independents.

Overall, when given the choice between Congress reinstating the FCC's 2015 “net neutrality” rules that apply only to ISPs, or Congress passing legislation that both puts the tenets of “net neutrality” into law and ensures that they are treated in a fair and neutral manner by all internet companies (including on privacy), they prefer the latter by a 57-23% margin.

Key findings indicate near universal support for federal legislation that applies certain "guiding principles" of neutrality, transparency and privacy protections to all internet companies:

• 89% - Every ISP would need to disclose accurate and relevant information in plain language regarding the price, performance, and network management practices of its services. 
• 88% - Social media sites and apps, and search engines would be required to fully disclose their practices on censorship, child protection and prohibiting the use of their services for illegal activities.
• 88% - ISPs, social media sites and apps, and search engines would all have to follow the same rules to protect your privacy and the security of your data.
• 87% - Consumers would have the freedom to use the personal devices and apps they want.
• 84% - ISPs could not block or slow down websites or services that consumers access on the internet.
• 84% - To ensure a level playing field for all competitors, there would be one set of rules that apply to all internet companies.

While Maine voters may think “net neutrality” is important, their concerns about privacy, censorship and trust on the internet go significantly beyond the products and services offered by an ISP. Voters feel strongly that all internet companies – ISPs, search engines and social media companies – should be governed by the same comprehensive consumer-focused legislation that addresses internet privacy and transparency far more than just "net neutrality" applied solely to ISPs.

Read the full poll memo here.

###

Founded in 1998, the Center for Individual Freedom is a constitutional and free market advocacy organization with hundreds of thousands of activists and supporters nationwide

 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which of the following was the first U.S. President to exercise the pocket veto?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Germany is no longer the largest recipient of new asylum applications worldwide, according to the United Nations: the U.S. is.A report released Tuesday by the U.N. Refugee Agency showed that the number of new, individual asylum applicants plummeted drastically by 73 percent in Germany between 2016 and 2017, from 722,400 down to 198,300.Meanwhile, the U.S. saw a nearly 27 percent increase in new applications…[more]
 
 
—Emma Anderson, Brussels-based POLITICO Assistant News Editor
— Emma Anderson, Brussels-based POLITICO Assistant News Editor
 
Liberty Poll   

Recognizing that there will be more DOJ IG reports on DOJ/FBI issues, what level of trust do you have in the accuracy, fairness and conclusions of the just-issued report on the FBI's handling of the Hillary Clinton investigation?