In rare but refreshing bipartisan good news out of Congress, Senator Thom Tillis (R – North Carolina…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Members of Congress Stand Up for Property Rights

In rare but refreshing bipartisan good news out of Congress, Senator Thom Tillis (R – North Carolina) and Representatives Ben Cline (R - Virginia), Theodore Deutch (D - Florida), Martha Roby (R - Alabama) and Harley Rouda (D – California) have just taken a firm stand protecting property rights – copyrights specifically – and merit our praise.

As we’ve long highlighted, property rights constitute a central pillar of “American Exceptionalism,” and that includes intellectual property (IP) rights – copyrights, patents, trademarks and trade secrets.   Our Founding Fathers considered IP so important that they deliberately and explicitly singled it out for protection in the text of the Constitution.  As a direct result, we’ve become the most innovative and prosperous nation…[more]

December 06, 2019 • 02:15 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Center for Individual Freedom Releases Survey Measuring Net Neutrality’s Importance to Voters
Center for Individual Freedom Releases Survey Measuring Net Neutrality’s Importance to Voters Print
Monday, March 26 2018

Net Neutrality Trails Other Top Issues, Such As Entitlement Reform, Healthcare, Immigration Reform and Reducing the Federal Budget Deficit, Among Several Others

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) announced results of a new survey conducted by Morning Consult concerning voters’ overall attitude toward "net neutrality."

In recent months, "net neutrality" has become a hot-button political phrase in Washington, D.C. policy circles.  To determine whether voters' attitudes toward the issue matched the rhetorical intensity of the policy debate inside the Washington, D.C., beltway, CFIF commissioned a survey of 1,913 registered voters from March 7-9 to measure whether “net neutrality” actually moves the needle for voters ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.

Among the results, when asked to rate how important an issue that has been in the news lately was in determining their vote, “net neutrality” came in dead last. In fact, "net neutrality" was not deemed "very important" by a majority of any demographic group surveyed.

When asked to prioritize which of the issues was most important in determining their vote, "net neutrality" was selected by a scant four percent of voters. A candidate’s position on issues dealing with entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security, healthcare, immigration, the federal budget deficit, and infrastructure, among other issues, were all more important to voters.

Even when expanded to their top two issues in determining who they would vote for, only 8% of voters surveyed specified "net neutrality" as either the first or second most important issue for them. For comparison, views about entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security were deemed most important by 38% of voters, while healthcare was selected by 37%.

"Recent news surrounding net neutrality has inspired heated rhetoric, but for everyday Americans, net neutrality ranks at the very bottom of the priority list," said Jeffrey Mazzella, CFIF's President.  "Even among those who stated that net neutrality was important to them, virtually none of them ranked it in their top two issues of concern.  Simply put, the inside-the-beltway noise surrounding net neutrality – driven by well-funded, professional activists – just doesn’t match the reality of what voters are concerned about."

To read the polling memo, click here.

Founded in 1998, the Center for Individual Freedom is a constitutional and free market advocacy organization with hundreds of thousands of activists and supporters nationwide.

### 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Where is the USS Arizona Memorial located?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"It's now official: Russia, Russia, Russia really was fake news from the start. There was no factual basis for the FBI to spy on Donald Trump's campaign.That means there was no need for the appointment of a special counsel and that Robert Mueller should have stayed in retirement. It means the two years of rumors and accusations and the giant cloud of suspicions over the White House produced by Mueller…[more]
 
 
—Michael Goodwin, New York Post
— Michael Goodwin, New York Post
 
Liberty Poll   

Should House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff be investigated for subpoenaing and publishing call log records (with no details or context) of another member of congress, the president's attorney, a journalist and others?