CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed "Net Neutrality…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.  Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite latenight comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="760"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 18, 2024 • 11:47 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Press Room Center for Individual Freedom Releases Survey Measuring Net Neutrality’s Importance to Voters
Center for Individual Freedom Releases Survey Measuring Net Neutrality’s Importance to Voters Print
Monday, March 26 2018

Net Neutrality Trails Other Top Issues, Such As Entitlement Reform, Healthcare, Immigration Reform and Reducing the Federal Budget Deficit, Among Several Others

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) announced results of a new survey conducted by Morning Consult concerning voters’ overall attitude toward "net neutrality."

In recent months, "net neutrality" has become a hot-button political phrase in Washington, D.C. policy circles.  To determine whether voters' attitudes toward the issue matched the rhetorical intensity of the policy debate inside the Washington, D.C., beltway, CFIF commissioned a survey of 1,913 registered voters from March 7-9 to measure whether “net neutrality” actually moves the needle for voters ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.

Among the results, when asked to rate how important an issue that has been in the news lately was in determining their vote, “net neutrality” came in dead last. In fact, "net neutrality" was not deemed "very important" by a majority of any demographic group surveyed.

When asked to prioritize which of the issues was most important in determining their vote, "net neutrality" was selected by a scant four percent of voters. A candidate’s position on issues dealing with entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security, healthcare, immigration, the federal budget deficit, and infrastructure, among other issues, were all more important to voters.

Even when expanded to their top two issues in determining who they would vote for, only 8% of voters surveyed specified "net neutrality" as either the first or second most important issue for them. For comparison, views about entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security were deemed most important by 38% of voters, while healthcare was selected by 37%.

"Recent news surrounding net neutrality has inspired heated rhetoric, but for everyday Americans, net neutrality ranks at the very bottom of the priority list," said Jeffrey Mazzella, CFIF's President.  "Even among those who stated that net neutrality was important to them, virtually none of them ranked it in their top two issues of concern.  Simply put, the inside-the-beltway noise surrounding net neutrality – driven by well-funded, professional activists – just doesn’t match the reality of what voters are concerned about."

To read the polling memo, click here.

Founded in 1998, the Center for Individual Freedom is a constitutional and free market advocacy organization with hundreds of thousands of activists and supporters nationwide.

### 

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"Soon the government might shut down your car.President Joe Biden's new infrastructure gives bureaucrats that power.You probably didn't hear about that because when media covered it, few mentioned the requirement that by 2026, every American car must 'monitor' the driver, determine if he is impaired and, if so, 'limit vehicle operation.'Rep. Thomas Massie objected, complaining that the law makes government…[more]
 
 
— John Stossel, Author, Pundit and Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you mostly approve or mostly disapprove of U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson's plan to introduce foreign aid packages for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan before legislation on U.S. border security?