We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
WSJ Urges Regulators to Approve T-Mobile/Sprint Merger

We at CFIF have steadfastly highlighted the consumer benefits of the proposed T-Mobile/Sprint merger, and cautioned the federal government against any pointless and destructive objection to the deal.  In today's Wall Street Journal, its editorial board encourages the Department of Justice (DOJ) to move forward on the deal:

The Justice Department lost its lawsuit to block AT&T's purchase of Time Warner.  Yet now the antitrust cops are holding up T-Mobile's merger with Sprint even though it could give AT&T more competition in wireless.  What gives?

A year ago, T-Mobile announced plans to acquire Sprint for $26 billion in stock, yet the merger is still stuck in government antitrust purgatory.  The Federal Communications Commission keeps pausing its 180-day shot clock on the merger…[more]

April 22, 2019 • 04:07 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Center for Individual Freedom Releases Survey Measuring Net Neutrality’s Importance to Voters
Center for Individual Freedom Releases Survey Measuring Net Neutrality’s Importance to Voters Print
Monday, March 26 2018

Net Neutrality Trails Other Top Issues, Such As Entitlement Reform, Healthcare, Immigration Reform and Reducing the Federal Budget Deficit, Among Several Others

WASHINGTON, DC – Today, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) announced results of a new survey conducted by Morning Consult concerning voters’ overall attitude toward "net neutrality."

In recent months, "net neutrality" has become a hot-button political phrase in Washington, D.C. policy circles.  To determine whether voters' attitudes toward the issue matched the rhetorical intensity of the policy debate inside the Washington, D.C., beltway, CFIF commissioned a survey of 1,913 registered voters from March 7-9 to measure whether “net neutrality” actually moves the needle for voters ahead of the 2018 midterm elections.

Among the results, when asked to rate how important an issue that has been in the news lately was in determining their vote, “net neutrality” came in dead last. In fact, "net neutrality" was not deemed "very important" by a majority of any demographic group surveyed.

When asked to prioritize which of the issues was most important in determining their vote, "net neutrality" was selected by a scant four percent of voters. A candidate’s position on issues dealing with entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security, healthcare, immigration, the federal budget deficit, and infrastructure, among other issues, were all more important to voters.

Even when expanded to their top two issues in determining who they would vote for, only 8% of voters surveyed specified "net neutrality" as either the first or second most important issue for them. For comparison, views about entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security were deemed most important by 38% of voters, while healthcare was selected by 37%.

"Recent news surrounding net neutrality has inspired heated rhetoric, but for everyday Americans, net neutrality ranks at the very bottom of the priority list," said Jeffrey Mazzella, CFIF's President.  "Even among those who stated that net neutrality was important to them, virtually none of them ranked it in their top two issues of concern.  Simply put, the inside-the-beltway noise surrounding net neutrality – driven by well-funded, professional activists – just doesn’t match the reality of what voters are concerned about."

To read the polling memo, click here.

Founded in 1998, the Center for Individual Freedom is a constitutional and free market advocacy organization with hundreds of thousands of activists and supporters nationwide.

### 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
In which one of the following years was the first White House Easter Egg Roll held?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"The credibility of the Democratic Party is now at issue.If Mueller could not find collusion, what reason is there to believe Rep. Jerry Nadler's judiciary committee will find it, and then convince the country that they have discovered what ex-FBI Director Mueller could not.With conspiracy and collusion off the table, and Mueller saying the case for obstruction is unproven, the renewed attack on Trump…[more]
 
 
—Patrick J. Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and The American Conservative Magazine Founding Editor
— Patrick J. Buchanan, Syndicated Columnist and The American Conservative Magazine Founding Editor
 
Liberty Poll   

How likely are you to read all or a significant part of the Mueller Report?