Surprise, surprise.  So Google, perhaps the leading proponent of so-called "Net Neutrality," predictably…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Net "Neutrality": Google Says Nondiscrimination for Me, But Not for Thee

Surprise, surprise.  So Google, perhaps the leading proponent of so-called "Net Neutrality," predictably doesn't consider itself constrained by the same rules of nondiscrimination from which it seeks to benefit via government intervention:

Progressives have long argued that the federal government must protect the Internet from discrimination by treating service providers like Comcast as public utilities.  Now we learn that the Net doesn't have to be neutral, as long as Google is the company targeting legal businesses that are politically unpopular.  Google recently announced in a blog post that the search engine would no longer run advertisements for payday loans with high interest rates and a 60-day repayment period.  'Ads for financial services are a particular area of vigilance given…[more]

May 31, 2016 • 01:05 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Statement of CFIF's Timothy Lee on FCC's Unprecedented Power Grab to Regulate the Internet
Statement of CFIF's Timothy Lee on FCC's Unprecedented Power Grab to Regulate the Internet Print
Thursday, May 06 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA – According to reports, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Julius Genachowski will seek to reclassify broadband services under New Deal-era "common carrier" laws created for early landline telephone technology, thereby allowing the government to regulate the Internet via outdated rules. 

In response, Center for Individual Freedom Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs Timothy Lee issued the following statement:

“The FCC should not attempt to apply archaic 1930s rules to 21st century technologies.  This move by Chairman Genachowski will do nothing but stifle innovation, investment and growth within the broadband sector.

“Reclassifying broadband will merely allow the government to intervene in a thriving Internet market and hamper the constant service improvement and innovations to which consumers have become accustomed.  It’s the proverbial ’solution in search of a problem.’  This bald partisan move also ignores all of the new technologies that are available precisely due to limited government intervention, and will ultimately move us backward to  old-fashioned rules that once governed telephone services in the early 20th century.

“With everything else going on, do we really need a government take over the Internet?”

###


 To schedule an interview with Timothy Lee, please call 703-535-5836.

The Center for Individual Freedom ("CFIF") is a non-profit organization with more than 250,000 grassroots supporters and activists.  Established in 1998, CFIF seeks to safeguard and advance Constitutional rights and free-market principles, and ensure continued American innovation, leadership, economic prosperity and worldwide entrepreneurial preeminence. 


 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Since its inception in 1861, how many Medal of Honor recipients have been women?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Smart Democrats began dusting off copies of their Plan B for the 2016 fall campaign this week. They were prompted by a devastating report from Department of Justice inspector general, who found that 'significant security risks' were raised by Hillary Clinton's decision to use a private e-mail server at the State Department. ...Democrats will carefully watch the polls in the next few weeks. If Hillary…[more]
 
 
—John Fund, National Review OnLine
— John Fund, National Review OnLine
 
Liberty Poll   

If Bernie Sanders debates Donald Trump before the California presidential primaries, who will be the biggest loser?