If you’re confused about what to call the newest terrorist threat – ISIS or ISIL – Daniel Pipes…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
ISIS or ISIL?

If you’re confused about what to call the newest terrorist threat – ISIS or ISIL – Daniel Pipes, the renowned conservative Middle East expert, has an answer.

Whichever one you want.

The Obama administration prefers “Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant” (ISIL), while almost everyone else uses “Islamic State in Iraq and Syria” (ISIS). At first blush, some commentators think they detect a subtle framing effect to blur any possible links between the rise of this group with Obama’s blundering Syria policy.

Pipes isn’t one of them. According to him, “both translations are accurate, both are correct, and both have deficiencies – one refers to a state, the other has an archaic ring.” Pipes should know since he wrote a book about the underlying history that gives rise…[more]

September 12, 2014 • 06:57 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Statement of CFIF's Timothy Lee on FCC's Unprecedented Power Grab to Regulate the Internet
Statement of CFIF's Timothy Lee on FCC's Unprecedented Power Grab to Regulate the Internet Print
Thursday, May 06 2010

ALEXANDRIA, VA – According to reports, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Julius Genachowski will seek to reclassify broadband services under New Deal-era "common carrier" laws created for early landline telephone technology, thereby allowing the government to regulate the Internet via outdated rules. 

In response, Center for Individual Freedom Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs Timothy Lee issued the following statement:

“The FCC should not attempt to apply archaic 1930s rules to 21st century technologies.  This move by Chairman Genachowski will do nothing but stifle innovation, investment and growth within the broadband sector.

“Reclassifying broadband will merely allow the government to intervene in a thriving Internet market and hamper the constant service improvement and innovations to which consumers have become accustomed.  It’s the proverbial ’solution in search of a problem.’  This bald partisan move also ignores all of the new technologies that are available precisely due to limited government intervention, and will ultimately move us backward to  old-fashioned rules that once governed telephone services in the early 20th century.

“With everything else going on, do we really need a government take over the Internet?”

###


 To schedule an interview with Timothy Lee, please call 703-535-5836.

The Center for Individual Freedom ("CFIF") is a non-profit organization with more than 250,000 grassroots supporters and activists.  Established in 1998, CFIF seeks to safeguard and advance Constitutional rights and free-market principles, and ensure continued American innovation, leadership, economic prosperity and worldwide entrepreneurial preeminence. 


 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following significant days in American history has been designated Patriot Day by Joint Congressional Resolution?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Barring a dramatic surprise, the basic contours of this year’s Senate races are pretty much set. They will be defined by President Obama’s extraordinarily low 40 percent approval rating, a stagnant economy for those in the middle class, and the White House’s inability to tout any policy success stories that voters care about. That said, Republicans have clearly decided to play it…[more]
 
 
—John Fund, National Review Online National-Affairs Columnist
— John Fund, National Review Online National-Affairs Columnist
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe that President Obama is committed to decisively combating ISIS or is merely giving lip service to it because of public opinion regarding his entire foreign policy approach?