One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
To Get More Federal Money, States Claiming Volunteer Organizations are a Form of Welfare Spending

One of the great triumphs of the federal welfare reform legislation passed in the mid-1990s was an insistence that states lay down tough work requirements for welfare recipients as a condition of receiving federal assistance. Though the fact is little publicized, however, another provision of the law allows states to substitute increased welfare spending for the work requirements and still receive money from Washington. That, of course, is an invitation to mischief, as reported by CNSnews, quoting Congressman Geoff Davis

"Many States have scoured their budgets to find other current program spending--such as for Pre-K, child care, and after school programs--they could report as TANF [welfare] spending," Davis said at a hearing on Thursday. "Others began counting third-party spending--such…[more]

May 22, 2012 • 01:24 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room CFIF Advises FCC Against Regulation of Wireless and Specialized Services
CFIF Advises FCC Against Regulation of Wireless and Specialized Services Print
Tuesday, October 12 2010

In an official Comment filed this week with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) unequivocally warned  against imposition of “Net Neutrality” and other unnessary and onerous regulations on wireless and “specialized services.”  The FCC had solicited comments on what it labeled “under-developed” issues in its larger effort to regulate the Internet sector. 

Specifically, CFIF warned: 

“The American public is rapidly approaching the end of its patience.  A primary basis for that disapproval is a federal government whose administrative agencies increasingly succumb to ‘the danger of dogma,’ as earnestly described by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski during his June 16, 2009 nomination hearing.  By a two-to-one margin (53% to 27%), for instance, scientific opinion polls reveal an electorate opposed to the FCC’s current effort to regulate the Internet.  Moreover, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled unanimously this year that the FCC does not possess the authority to regulate Internet service providers’ network management practices.  Furthermore, the nation’s elected Congressional representatives have also refused to enact Net Neutrality legislation.  Despite these unequivocal rejections, the FCC persists in its ironically dogmatic effort to enact the Net Neutrality agenda by any means necessary.” 

CFIF’s Comment proceeded to set forth an array of data establishing the harm that such burdensome and unnecessary regulation will cause the Internet sector by discouraging the type of innovation and massive amounts of private investment that have made the Internet what it is today. 

Read CFIF's full comment here (.pdf).

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following men did the Chicago Tribune describe as: “a bullheaded man whose high place … was won by his ability to waste more money in quicker time on more absurd undertakings?”
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"This week Catholic bishops are heading to federal courts across the country to defend religious liberty. On Monday they filed 12 lawsuits on behalf of a diverse group of 43 Catholic entities that are challenging the Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) sterilization, abortifacient and birth-control insurance mandate. ...  The main goal of the mandate is not, as HHS claimed, to protect…[more]
 
 
—Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
— Mary Ann Glendon, Harvard Law School Professor
 
Liberty Poll   

Should the Obama administration authorize the use of aerial drones by local police agencies?