Below is one of the latest cartoons from two-time Pulitzer Prize-winner Michael Ramirez. View…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
The Recount

Below is one of the latest cartoons from two-time Pulitzer Prize-winner Michael Ramirez.

View more of Michael Ramirez’s cartoons on CFIF’s website here.…[more]

December 08, 2016 • 11:08 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Press Releases
Coalition Urges Congress to Reject Department of Labor Overtime Rule Print E-mail
Tuesday, May 17 2016

In a letter sent to Congress today, the Center for Individual Freedom ("CFIF") joined a coalition of 17 organizations to express "strong support for S. 2707 and H.R. 4773, the Protecting Workplace Advancement and Opportunity Act (PWAOA), and all efforts to defund, block, and otherwise nullify the Obama Administration’s effort to change our nation’s overtime rules."

The letter, which was organized by the Competitive Enterprise Institute, reads in part, "The bills, sponsored by Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Congressman Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), respectively, would nullify the Department of Labor’s proposed overtime regulation. Specifically, the legislation requires the U.S. Secretary of Labor to conduct a thorough economic analysis on how updating overtime rules would affect small businesses and take into consideration cost-of-living differences across the country, among other research before proposing another overtime rule."

Read the entire letter below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 17, 2016

Members of Congress:

On behalf of the undersigned organizations and the millions of Americans we represent, we write to express our strong support for S. 2707 and H.R. 4773, the Protecting Workplace Advancement and Opportunity Act (PWAOA), and all efforts to defund, block, and otherwise nullify the Obama Administration’s effort to change our nation’s overtime rules. The administration’s proposed overtime rule, should it be made final, would threaten flexible work arrangements and paths to success.

The bills, sponsored by Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.) and Congressman Tim Walberg (R-Mich.), respectively, would nullify the Department of Labor’s proposed overtime regulation. Specifically, the legislation requires the U.S. Secretary of Labor to conduct a thorough economic analysis on how updating overtime rules would affect small businesses and take into consideration cost-of-living differences across the country, among other research before proposing another overtime rule.

The undersigned groups believe workers should receive fair pay for a day’s work, but the overtime rule as proposed is a poor vehicle to do so.

Industries and organizations across the country—from universities to community care providers—would face drastic increases in labor costs as a result of the Obama administration’s new interpretation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The administration’s proposed overtime rule would make an additional 5 million workers eligible for overtime pay by dramatically increasing the salary threshold exemption from $23,660 to $50,440. By increasing the threshold, many workers will lose salaried employment status and the benefits they depend on, like flexible work arrangements and health benefits.  

Public colleges and universities fear the added costs will force reductions to student services, cuts to employee benefits, and limit employees’ work hours that could reduce important labor-intensive research.

Organizations that provide services to the disabled community, primarily funded by Medicaid, would face an estimated $1.05 billion in additional costs, according to analysis performed by health research firm Avalere Health. These workers provide vital services to those in our communities that need help.

The Small Business Administration’s Office of Advocacy, which represent small entities before the federal government, submitted comments that the Department of Labor’s analysis of the rule fails to “inform the public about the impact of this rule on small entities.”

Most concerning, the DOL’s methodology used to analyze overtime costs is unknown. The Obama administration denied the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity’s (FDEO) request to check the methodology used to anticipate the costs. The FDEO performed its own analysis. It found that in Florida alone, the costs would be $1.7 billion from the 195,000 new overtime eligible workers in Florida, while the DOL estimates the direct and indirect costs of the rule would only be $1.8 billion nationwide.

A rule that could negatively affect millions of workers and the futures of numerous small businesses and industries cannot be issued without thorough analysis by the agency.

We encourage members of Congress to do everything in their power to nullify this rule and defund any future efforts to implement the final rule. We support the PWAOA so that any update to overtime regulations is vigorously vetted and serves the interests of all Americans. In response to the final rule, we also support Senate and House members pursuing a resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to block the overtime rule and its devastating consequences for small business owners and workers across the nation.

Thank you for your consideration.
 
Sincerely,
 
Competitive Enterprise Institute
American Commitment
Americans for Prosperity
Americans for Tax Reform
Campaign for Liberty
Center for Individual Freedom
Center for Worker Freedom
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste
FreedomWorks
Frontiers of Freedom
James Madison Institute
Jefferson Project
John Locke Foundation
Less Government
National Taxpayers Union
R Street Institute
Taxpayers Protection Alliance

 


Page 12 of 143
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was the first U.S. President to fly in a modified jet airplane specifically built for presidential use?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"What is astounding, post-election, is the total lack of contrition Democrats have displayed for ignoring the workingman and -woman bloc that has been the party's horn of plenty. The only regret they display is that they lost the election, not the voters. What Democrats, academics and pundits keep refusing to see is that the loss was never about Trump's candidacy; it was all about how Democrats have…[more]
 
 
—Salena Zito, New York Post
— Salena Zito, New York Post
 
Liberty Poll   

Which one of the following finalists would you favor to win the “Baracki,” a totally fake and fictitious award for the most fabulous fake news of 2016?