In our latest Liberty Update we highlighted in "10 Years After Katrina, Failed Global Warming Prophecies…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Apocalypse Not, Cont'd: In 2008, ABC News Aired Some Amusing Climate Catastrophe Visions for 2015

In our latest Liberty Update we highlighted in "10 Years After Katrina, Failed Global Warming Prophecies Accumulate" how global warming alarmists continue to rely on predictions of imminent doom, despite the fact that their record of prediction is one of failure after failure.

Add another glaring and amusing example to that list.  In 2008, ABC News ran a "news" feature entitled "Earth 2100."  It's worth watching the 9-minute clip, which suggests such possibilities as milk at $12.00 per gallon and gas at $9.00 per gallon, as recalled by The Daily Caller:

Newsbusters notes that then GMA anchor Chris Cuomo, who teased the special at the time, said to [Bob] Woodruff of the predictions, 'I think we're familiar with some of these issues, but boy, 2015?  That's seven years from now…[more]

September 01, 2015 • 09:22 am

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Press Releases
CFIF's Supplemental FCC Comment In Opposition to Internet Regulation Print E-mail
Friday, July 18 2014

 

Before the

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20554

 

 

 

__________________________________________

                                                                          )

In the Matter of:                                                          )

                                                                                    )

Protecting and Promoting the Open                           )          GN Docket No. 14-28                 

Internet                                                                       )

                                                                                    )

__________________________________________)          

 

 

 

Comment of the Center for Individual Freedom in Opposition to Internet Regulation

 

  

The Center for Individual Freedom (hereinafter “CFIF”), a constitutional and free market advocacy organization with more than 250,000 activists and supporters nationwide, respectfully submits the following supplemental Comment in opposition to so-called “Net Neutrality” regulation of the Internet contemplated by the Federal Communications Commission (hereinafter “FCC”). 

 

CFIF has filed a joint Comment in this matter alongside fellow free-market advocates, which details in fuller depth our substantive and legal opposition to this unprecedented form of Internet regulation.[1]  We submit this separate supplemental Comment, however, to emphasize a point particular to CFIF. 

 

Specifically, in recent weeks CFIF has worked to educate and inform its activist base and others about the Internet regulations contemplated in this matter.  As part of that effort, CFIF has invited public comment on the matter.  To date, CFIF’s efforts alone have resulted in no fewer than 60,000 comments being generated and sent to the FCC and Congress in opposition to the proposed FCC rules.  Those comments read, in part: 

 

“Over the past two decades, the Internet has flourished and revolutionized our lives precisely because it has remained free of government overregulation.  Recently, however, Obama’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) proposed new rules that would reclassify broadband Internet as a monopoly-era plain old telephone service of decades past (a.k.a. common carrier telecommunications service) under Title II of the Communications Act.  Simply put, the federal government micromanaging the Internet is a dangerous scheme, one that Congress must halt and the FCC must abandon.  As a concerned citizen, I urge you to do everything in your power to stop any and all efforts by the FCC to reclassify broadband Internet under Title II of the Communications Act.” 

 

These citizens join CFIF in recognizing that the campaign to regulate the Internet like a public utility is one whose transparent goal and effect is to leverage federal regulatory force to the benefit of a narrow group of special interests.  It also constitutes an example of activist and bureaucratic hubris, one that will ultimately only harm consumers, jeopardize continued private investment in Internet infrastructure, threaten job growth and sow regulatory uncertainty. 

 

According to former FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell, "the Internet is the greatest deregulatory success story of all time — a simple fact that vexes those seeking new and unnecessary rules.”[2]  To date, $1.2 trillion has been invested into Internet infrastructure since 1996 by private broadband providers, while the Internet has given rise to leading American content companies such as Google, Facebook and Netflix, as well as over 750,000 jobs encompassing today’s “apps economy.”  Additionally, more than 99 percent of Americans have access to multiple high speed wireless or wired Internet service options, Internet speeds have increased 1,500 percent in the last decade and today 85 percent of American households possess access to networks capable of 100 megabits per second or higher.  By almost any objective measure, the Internet has flourished, all because of a conscious policy decision by lawmakers since the mid-1990s not to regulate the Internet as some sort of public utility.

 

           Accordingly, CFIF implores the FCC to halt this dangerous attempt to micromanage Internet service.   

 

Respectfully submitted,

 

Center for Individual Freedom 

Jeffrey Mazzella 

President 

815 King Street 

Suite 303

Alexandria, VA 22314 

 

July 18, 2014

 

 


Page 13 of 108
Question of the Week   
Which one of the following U.S. cities was the first to initiate a student lunch program?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"While she was secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton wrote and sent at least six e-mails using her private server that contained what government officials now say is classified information, according to thousands of e-mails released by the State Department. Although government officials deemed the e-mails classified after Clinton left office, they could complicate her efforts to move beyond the…[more]
 
 
—Carol D. Leonnig and Rosalind S. Helderman, The Washington Post
— Carol D. Leonnig and Rosalind S. Helderman, The Washington Post
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe that Vice President Joe Biden’s willingness to consider a presidential run is because he knows more than the public knows about the content of Hillary Clinton’s emails?