In recent months CFIF has highlighted the danger of relying upon Russian rocket technology, and the…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Analysis: SpaceX Cuts Rocket Launch Costs for USAF

In recent months CFIF has highlighted the danger of relying upon Russian rocket technology, and the need to leverage the U.S. private sector in providing effective, lower cost, domestic rocket engines for space launches.

Now, a new analysis reveals how much one of those private sector entities, SpaceX, can save the U.S. Air Force.  Previous cost estimates occurred when Air Force launch vehicles consisted entirely of United Launch Alliance (ULA) rockets, but the Government Accountability Office (GAO) complained that ULA's rendered accurate cost assessment and price negotiation impossible.  Then, new rocket enterprise SpaceX began offering launch services at lower prices, and cost comparison has become more feasible.  And it's already apparent that SpaceX significantly undercuts launch…[more]

June 23, 2017 • 01:44 pm

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Press Releases
CFIF Reiterates Concerns Regarding Proposals to Restructure Nation's Air Traffic Control (ATC) System Print E-mail
Thursday, February 09 2017

February 9, 2017 

The Honorable Bill Shuster                                     The Honorable Peter DeFazio 
Chairman                                                                Ranking Member 
House Transportation and Infrastructure                House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee                                                               Committee 
U.S.  House of Representatives                              U.S. House of Representatives 
2251 Rayburn House Office Building                      2134 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C.  20515                                        Washington, D.C. 20515 

The Honorable Rick Larsen                                    The Honorable Frank LoBiondo 
House Transportation and Infrastructure                House Transportation and Infrastructure 
Committee                                                               Committee 
U.S. House of Representatives                               U.S. House of Representatives 
2113 Rayburn House Office Building                      2427 Rayburn House Office Building 
Washington, D.C.  20515                                        Washington, D.C.  20515 


Dear Chairman Shuster, Ranking Member DeFazio, Representative Larsen, and Representative LoBiondo: 

On behalf of over 250,000 supporters and activists across the nation, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) reiterates our deep concerns regarding leading proposals to restructure the nation's air traffic control (ATC) system. 

In that vein, please find the coalition letter from August of last year that details many of those concerns here

Since that letter, the Defense Department stated just last week that creating a separate new ATC organization "raises serious concerns."  In its analysis, the Pentagon said, "The establishment of a new entity separate from the FAA raises serious concerns regarding the disposition of certain unique National Defense procedures, programs and policy."  It noted, "It is significant to note that the DOD relies on FAA 'command and control' capabilities in the execution of the national defense mission." 

Additionally, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) determined last year that creation of a nonprofit ATC corporation would widen the federal budget deficit by $20 billion between 2017 and 2026, and increase net direct spending by an alarming $90 billion over that same period.  Separately, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) also determined that the proposed ATC restructuring may delay implementation of the NextGen air transportation system while necessary new safety oversight procedures were developed. 

Although proponents of the current ATC restructuring proposal characterize it as "privatization," it isn't actual privatization at all.  Rather, it would create a federally-chartered nonprofit corporation that repeats the mistakes of previous public/private entities like Amtrak or the U.S. Postal Service.  The ATC proposal maintains monopoly power over air traffic control while continuing or expanding benefits for the current union of federal air traffic controllers.  That alone undermines the primary benefit that true privatization would provide, the ability to eliminate inefficiencies of government bureaucracy in favor of competition and free-market choice.  Indeed, the ATC proposal might actually weaken restraints on unionized air traffic controllers in such areas as personnel changes, salary limits and the current mandatory retirement age of 56 (compared to the retirement age of 65 for pilots themselves), which explains why the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) strongly favors the proposal.

We also remain concerned that the proposed new ATC entity would possess the power to levy new taxes and user fees without Congressional oversight or competition that true privatization would provide, which could result in skyrocketing travel costs for the consumers you represent. 

Thank you very much for your attention to this extremely important matter. 

Sincerely, 
/s/
Timothy Lee 
Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs 

 


Page 13 of 161
Question of the Week   
Under which branch of the U.S. government does the Federal Reserve fall?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Events are turning me into a radical skeptic. I no longer believe what I read, unless what I am reading is an empirically verifiable account of the past. I no longer have confidence in polls, because it has become impossible to separate the signal from the noise. What I have heard from the media and political class over the last several years has been so spectacularly proven wrong by events, again…[more]
 
 
—Matthew Continetti, Washington Free Beacon Editor in Chief
— Matthew Continetti, Washington Free Beacon Editor in Chief
 
Liberty Poll   

Based on analyses you have read or heard, do you support or oppose the Senate bill to replace ObamaCare?