Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan gives one of the best descriptions of the motivation behind the Tea Party movement to date.
For conservatives on the ground, it has often felt as if Democrats (and moderate Republicans) were always saying, “We should spend a trillion dollars,” and the Republican Party would respond, “No, too costly. How about $700 billion?” Conservatives on the ground are thinking, “How about nothing? How about we don’t spend more money but finally start cutting.”
That laser-like focus, to Noonan, is what connects all Tea Party-backed candidates this election cycle:
That is the context. Local tea parties seem—so far—not to be falling in love with the particular talents or background of their candidates. It’s more detached than that. They don’t say their candidates will be reflective, skilled in negotiations, a great senator, a Paul Douglas or Pat Moynihan or a sturdy Scoop Jackson. These qualities are not what they think are urgently needed. What they want is someone who will walk in, put her foot on the conservative end of the yardstick, and make everything slip down in that direction.
A vast swath of the American people understand the danger our country’s finances – and by extension, our experiment in self-rule – face. The Tea Party movement is an important element in righting the ship of state before it’s too late. Hopefully, congressional members owing the movement their election victories will display the fortitude necessary to say no to more spending.
CFIF on Twitter
CFIF on YouTube