{"id":10110,"date":"2011-06-14T18:06:20","date_gmt":"2011-06-14T22:06:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=10110"},"modified":"2011-06-14T18:06:20","modified_gmt":"2011-06-14T22:06:20","slug":"medichoice-not-premium-support","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/10110\/medichoice-not-premium-support\/","title":{"rendered":"MediChoice, not &#8220;Premium Support&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Deroy Murdock has a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/articles\/print\/269258\">great column<\/a> up this week. He credits my wise friend Jim Guirard, veteran of many a battle on Capitol Hill, for proposing better marketing language for Paul Ryan&#8217;s Medicare proposal (or variations thereof).<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Jim Guirard, long-time chief of staff to the late Sen. Russell Long (D., La.), runs the TrueSpeak Institute (<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/truespeak.org\/\">TrueSpeak.org<\/a><\/span>).  He advises the GOP to market \u201cMediChoice.\u201d Unlike the head-scratching  that \u201cpremium support\u201d inspires, MediChoice signals that Republicans  would give seniors choice in medical coverage. Just as the <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.gibill.va.gov\/\">GI Bill<\/a><\/span> helps veterans pay tuition at schools that match their interests,  MediChoice would help future Medicare recipients (now 54 or younger) buy  coverage that suits their circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Guirard urges Republicans to call today\u2019s Medicare system \u201cMediCrash.\u201d The Democrats\u2019 policy \u2014 snatching <a href=\"http:\/\/republican.senate.gov\/public\/index.cfm?FuseAction=Blogs.Detail&amp;Blog_ID=2a45564c-ad68-4107-8ff1-fe68f7553e56&amp;Month=9&amp;Year=2010\">$520 billion<\/a> from Medicare to fund Obamacare and pretending that the program is the  platonic form of fiscal health \u2014 invites financial catastrophe. By Sept.  30, 2020, the Congressional Budget Office forecasts, Medicare\u2019s Trust  Fund will be \u201c<span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/articles\/268699\/medicare-what-medicare-deroy-murdock\">exhausted<\/a><\/span>.\u201d  Republicans should reiterate that Democrats \u2014 not the greedy,  granny-killing GOP \u2014 perpetrated a half-trillion-dollar heist against  Medicare\u2019s coffers to underwrite Obamacare. Democrats pitifully refuse  to do anything to prevent this calamity. What will their negligence  yield in just over nine years? The CBO predicts: MediCrash.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Note, in the Murdock column, his photo at the bottom of a potential MediChoice notice that every senior citizen would receive.\u00a0 Talk about bringing home to them the essential idea that THEY and nobody else controls their choice of a health-care plan!\u00a0 Great idea.<\/p>\n<p>In the debate last night, Rick Santorum made the excellent point that what Ryan proposes is what ALREADY is working, in popular fashion, in the otherwise problematic Medicare Part D.\u00a0 If seniors can make such an individual-option plan work for prescription drugs, why not for their whole health-care coverage?<\/p>\n<p>I noted the same analogy <a href=\"http:\/\/www.catholicadvocate.com\/2011\/05\/the-catholicity-of-paul-ryan%E2%80%99s-budget\/\">here<\/a>, back on May 5. As I also explained:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[B]ecause of very similar, consumer-based, market-oriented provisions, has  cost the government far less money than projected while costing  consumers remarkably less in premiums than even the most optimistic  number-crunchers expected. In short, the experience of Medicare Part D  suggests that Ryan is hardly being outlandish to say that giving control  back to consumers in a market-based system can save money without  harming benefits \u2013 and thus preserve Medicare for future generations.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Now, back to Murdock. As he noted, Ryan&#8217;s plan is hardly radical:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Republicans should remind mewling Democrats that economists in liberal thinks tanks <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.heritage.org\/research\/reports\/2011\/04\/how-to-transform-medicare-into-a-modern-premium-support-system#_ftn2\">came up<\/a> with<\/span> the idea in the first place. The Brookings Institution\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brookings.edu\/experts\/aaronh.aspx\">Henry J. Aaron<\/a> and the Urban Institute\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.urban.org\/about\/officers.cfm\">Robert Reischauer<\/a> fathered \u201cpremium support\u201d in 1995.<\/p>\n<p>Former senator John Breaux (D., La.) promoted this reform as  co-chairman of President Clinton\u2019s bipartisan Medicare-overhaul  commission&#8230;. Former senator Bob Kerrey (D., Neb.) echoed Breaux. As he told Reuters  in May 1999: \u201cYou\u2019re much better off letting 50 million people make  decisions on their own than having [Washington] decide things from the  top down.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Santorum was right to take up the gantlet on this issue last night (and earlier), and Newt Gingrich is incredibly wrongheaded to run away from it.\u00a0 Meanwhile, with some smart use of language, as per Jim Guirard, MediChoice might be a real political winner.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Deroy Murdock has a great column up this week. He credits my wise friend Jim Guirard, veteran of many a battle on Capitol Hill, for proposing better marketing language for Paul Ryan&#8217;s Medicare proposal (or variations thereof). Jim Guirard, long-time chief of staff to the late Sen. Russell Long (D., La.), runs the TrueSpeak Institute [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2749,235,2785,802],"class_list":["post-10110","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-hillyer","tag-medicare","tag-murdock","tag-paul-ryan"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10110"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10110\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10111,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10110\/revisions\/10111"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10110"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}