{"id":10552,"date":"2011-07-21T11:33:21","date_gmt":"2011-07-21T15:33:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=10552"},"modified":"2011-07-21T11:33:21","modified_gmt":"2011-07-21T15:33:21","slug":"the-hillyer-mini-gang-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/10552\/the-hillyer-mini-gang-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"The Hillyer Mini-Gang Plan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at The American Spectator, <a href=\"http:\/\/spectator.org\/archives\/2011\/07\/21\/how-to-gang-up-against-obama\">I explain<\/a> why conservatives should accept a scaled-down version of the Gang of Six plan on the budget. Let me make it even more clear. Herewith, the Hillyer Plan, which has legislative elements simple enough that they should be able, on a fast track, to be passed by Aug. 2 &#8212; and if not, by about mid-August (which means a delayed August &#8220;recess&#8221;), which would require a temporary extension of the debt limit which all sides should accept. But let&#8217;s be up front about this: Sometimes, Washington gets WAY too tied up with official accounting &#8220;scores&#8221; of budget proposals, when in truth almost all out-year projections are nonsense, with huge shifts in numbers dependent on unpredictable effects of economic growth, inflation, and other factors. The Hillyer Plan would specifically NOT be &#8220;scored&#8221; in advance, because the point isn&#8217;t to figure how many economic assumptions can dance on the bead of an abacus. Instead, the guiding principle should be good policy combined with overall debt reduction, without worrying about whether the reduction officially hits a specific numerical target. As Jack Kemp and the Gingrich Congress showed, economic growth can and will balance a budget that is reasonably restrained.<\/p>\n<p>Okay, here&#8217;s the plan:<\/p>\n<p>1) Permanent (non-sunseted), three-tiered rates for both individual and corporate income taxes, at 12%, 24%, and 30%.<\/p>\n<p>2) Capital gains taxes at the same levels &#8212; except that the calculation of the base price would be indexed for inflation for the first time, and no individual capital gain under $5,000 would be taxed.<\/p>\n<p>3) Complete elimination of taxes on ordinary stock dividends. Dividend taxes require far too much accounting for far too little bang for the buck.<\/p>\n<p>4) A cap on the deduction for mortgage interest at $3,000 per month (adjusted upward for inflation every five years). Owners of McMansions will be getting a big enough break via cutting the top rate from 35% to 30% that this trade-off will be more than worth it. A cap, too, on the deduction for state and local income taxes, set at perhaps $10,000. (This would have the effect of at least subtly pressuring high-income-tax states to reduce their own tax rates, while of course gaining at least a little money for the feds.)<\/p>\n<p>5) Complete and permanent elimination of the Alternative Minimum Tax.<\/p>\n<p>6) Elimination of Barack Obama&#8217;s hated tax break for private jets.<\/p>\n<p>7) Elimination of all tax breaks for corn ethanol, combined with elimination of the import tariffs on cellulosic ethanol.<\/p>\n<p>8) From the Gang of Six plan: Shift to the chained-CPI (a more accurate measure of inflation)  government-wide starting in 2012, along with the following  specifications for Social Security: (1) exempt SSI from the shift for  five years, and then phase in the shift over the next five years; and  (2) provide a minimum benefit equal to 125% of the poverty line for five  years. (According to CBO, the shift to chained-CPI would result in the  annual adjustment growing, on average, about 0.25 percentage points per  year slower than the current CPI.)<\/p>\n<p>9) From the Gang of Six plan: Repeal the CLASS Act.<\/p>\n<p>10) Allow the Dems to pick any business tax &#8220;loopholes&#8221; of their choice for elimination, of up to $150 billion over ten years, of which the GOP would be obliged to accept $100 billion of them. (Note: The selection of options, first by the Dems and then by the GOP, could easily be done within two weeks.)<\/p>\n<p>11) Require the administration by law, within a year, to approve permits to open enough federal-government-owned lands to energy development to produce, via royalties and taxes, at least $100 billion in federal revenue over the next ten years. This idea stems from a column by Gary Palmer of the Alabama, not yet available online. Palmer explains: &#8220;<span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">According  to the U.S. Department of the Interior and the Bureau\u00a0 of Land  Management, there are 800 billion barrels of recoverable oil from oil  shale in the Green River Formation. This is three times more than the  proven oil reserves of Saudi Arabia. The Green River Formation covers  about 11 million acres in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, with about 80  percent of the recoverable oil in a 1,225 sq. mile area of western  Colorado. The  federal government owns or manages 73 percent of the lands that contain  significant oil shale deposits in the West and 80 percent of the  recoverable oil in the Green River Formation.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';\">12) Immediately remove authority to spend at least $75 billion in whatever <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/articles\/259528\/federal-government-s-unspent-billions-deroy-murdock\">&#8220;unobligated&#8221; funds<\/a> still remain (some were withdrawn a few months ago in the 2011 Continuing Resolution).<\/span><br \/>\n13) Pass a shell budget resolution that sets overall non-defense Appropriations limits for 2012 of $25 billion less than the combined budget authority approved for 2011 (in actual dollars, <em>without<\/em> an inflation adjustment).<\/p>\n<p>14) Before final passage of this whole package, pass &#8220;Sense of the House&#8221; and &#8220;Sense of the Senate&#8221; resolutions (there&#8217;s no time for actual legislation before Aug. 2 to implement the specifics)\u00a0 supporting the following items in the Gang of Six spending outline:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u2022 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions would find $70 billion.<br \/>\n\u2022 Homeland Security and Government Affairs would find $65 billion.<br \/>\n\u2022 Agriculture would find $11 billion while protecting the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program.<br \/>\n\u2022 Commerce would find $11 billion.<br \/>\n\u2022  Energy would find $6 billion and may propose additional policies to  generate savings that would be applied to the infrastructure deficit or  to reduce the deficit.<br \/>\n\u2022 Judiciary would find an unspecified amount through medical malpractice reform.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Impose spending caps and security\/nonsecurity firewalls.<br \/>\n\u2022 Sequester accounts at the end of the year to recoup any excessive spending by Congress.<br \/>\n\u2022 Restrict the use of emergency designations that circumvent the spending caps.<br \/>\n\u2022  Prevent Congress from exceeding the caps by requiring a stand-alone  resolution subject to a 67-vote threshold, in order to isolate that vote  to increase the deficit from any other policy items.<\/p>\n<p>\u2022 Achieve program integrity savings of $26 billion in entitlement  programs to curb fraud, abuse, and other wasteful spending  government-wide.<br \/>\n\u2022 Create a working group to provide updated budget concepts for CBO and OMB.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There. I hate to have a &#8220;14-point&#8221; plan because it has the cringe-inducing whiff of Woodrow Wilson, but that&#8217;s just how the numbering came out. Anyway, I believe every one of the first 13 points could actually be enacted in law by Aug. 2 or certainly by August 15, and while the resolutions in Point 14 obviously do not have the force of law until subsequent legislation enacts them, it would have enough moral force, with enough public attention, to effectively force compliance as soon as the complicated legislative wheels could operate.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at The American Spectator, I explain why conservatives should accept a scaled-down version of the Gang of Six plan on the budget. Let me make it even more clear. Herewith, the Hillyer Plan, which has legislative elements simple enough that they should be able, on a fast track, to be passed by Aug. 2 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[70,2877,2880,2749],"class_list":["post-10552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-budget","tag-debt-limit","tag-gang-of-six","tag-hillyer"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10552"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10552\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10558,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10552\/revisions\/10558"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}