{"id":10677,"date":"2011-07-31T15:13:24","date_gmt":"2011-07-31T19:13:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=10677"},"modified":"2011-07-31T15:13:24","modified_gmt":"2011-07-31T19:13:24","slug":"front-load-the-spending-cuts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/10677\/front-load-the-spending-cuts\/","title":{"rendered":"Front-Load the Spending Cuts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As House and Senate negotiators scramble to fashion a deal that can  garner 60 votes in the Senate, 216 or 217 votes in the House, and  President Alinsky&#8217;s signature (I still smell a last-minute torpedo job  from The One), three keys should guide the Republican leaders. First,  defense spending should be significantly protected. Second, absolutely  no tax hikes should be part of the &#8220;trigger&#8221; mechanism for the second  round of savings, and the Senators and House members appointed by GOP  leaders to the commission should also be known anti-taxers who have  signed the ATR pledge. Third, and this is of utmost importance: In order  to reassure conservatives, the domestic discretionary spending cuts  should be even more front-loaded than the Boehner plan was. The revised  Boehner plan cut $22 billion in the first year; the new one OUGHT to cut  at least $25 billion, and it should accordingly cut more in the second  year than Boehner&#8217;s revised plan did.<\/p>\n<p>Frankly, we should not care much what the caps are in years nine and ten; but history shows that spending caps actually tend to work in the first two or three years at least &#8212; and that if savings are achieved for more than one year, the &#8220;baseline&#8221; for future spending tends to drop and stay dropped for another two or three years &#8212; so the first two or three years are crucial.<\/p>\n<p>Frankly, as long as these three conditions are met, I think Reaganite conservatives will have won, on behalf of the public, a reasonably decent victory.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As House and Senate negotiators scramble to fashion a deal that can garner 60 votes in the Senate, 216 or 217 votes in the House, and President Alinsky&#8217;s signature (I still smell a last-minute torpedo job from The One), three keys should guide the Republican leaders. First, defense spending should be significantly protected. Second, absolutely [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2545,70,24,2908],"class_list":["post-10677","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-boehner","tag-budget","tag-obama","tag-spending-caps"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10677","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10677"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10677\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10678,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10677\/revisions\/10678"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10677"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10677"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10677"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}