{"id":15300,"date":"2012-08-02T12:37:51","date_gmt":"2012-08-02T16:37:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=15300"},"modified":"2012-08-02T12:47:40","modified_gmt":"2012-08-02T16:47:40","slug":"slate-trips-at-the-finish-line","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/15300\/slate-trips-at-the-finish-line\/","title":{"rendered":"Slate Trips at the Finish Line"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Talk to most people who write about politics for a living long enough and you&#8217;ll find that there are certain topics that aggravate them far out of proportion to their ultimate significance. Some issues just get up your nose, even if they&#8217;ll never command a news cycle.<\/p>\n<p>For me, one of those issues is the U.S. Postal Service. I&#8217;m one of those irritating, libertarian-leaning types that can&#8217;t resist the contrarian instinct to object when someone says that the federal government shouldn&#8217;t do anything beyond &#8220;Protecting our shores, defending the borders, and delivering the mail.&#8221; (For the record, I&#8217;m fine with the first two).<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps it started when I read about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lysanderspooner.org\/STAMP3.htm\" target=\"_blank\">the federal government&#8217;s epic battle with the anarcho-libertarian activist Lysander Spooner<\/a> in the 19th century, when he tried to upend their postal monopoly. But regardless, I&#8217;ve felt vindicated in recent years as the the lack of the USPS&#8217;s financial sustainability has come to light.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, you can only imagine the joy I felt when Matthew Yglesias, Slate&#8217;s liberal economics writer, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/articles\/business\/moneybox\/2012\/07\/usps_default_the_postal_service_can_t_pay_its_bills_anymore_it_s_time_to_privatize_it_.html\" target=\"_blank\">recently declared himself in favor of privatizing the Postal Service<\/a>. This was music to my ears:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The model is pretty simple, albeit a little old-fashioned as a way of  providing public services. Rather than having taxpayers directly finance  mail delivery, Congress has chartered a freestanding entity, the USPS,  charged with the legal obligation to provide low-cost daily mail service  six days a week to all Americans at a flat rate\u2014regardless of whether  it\u2019s cost-effective to do so. In exchange, that entity has a monopoly on  ordinary mail delivery. The idea is that the lucrative monopoly over  delivery to metropolitan areas will generate enough revenue to cover  money-losing rural services without the need for direct taxpayer  subsidies. The problem is that the monopoly isn\u2019t nearly as lucrative as  it used to be\u2014and barring some wild technological shift, it\u2019s going to  keep getting less and less lucrative.<\/p>\n<p>That means that administrative fixes related to Saturday delivery or  various schemes to more aggressively lay off workers or cut their pay  will only kick the can down the road. Sooner or later the basic model  will need a more thorough rethink.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Quite right. But here&#8217;s where he stumbles:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>But absent open-ended taxpayer subsidies, postal workers are going to  suffer. A monopoly on daily mail delivery is an intrinsically much less  valuable thing to have in 2012 than it was in 1992, and nothing can  change that. A humane approach to privatization would note that the USPS  currently owns a lot of valuable assets\u2014not only a good brand, but a  massive portfolio of real estate\u2014and that the federal government has no  real need for the one-time infusion of cash that would come from selling  it. That means the privatized company could be turned over to its  workforce as an employee-owned firm. Workers could have a say in how to  manage the transition and the ability to benefit as owners from more  efficient business even as they lost as workers from the same dynamic.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Those first two sentences are indisputably accurate. The rest of it? Barmy. Outright barmy.<\/p>\n<p>The federal government has &#8220;no need&#8221; for a &#8220;one-time infusion of cash&#8221;? The federal government is one slight downturn away from rooting through the cushions of congressional office furniture to pick up spare change! And the preferred method of privatizing the postal service is to turn it into a workers&#8217; collective? That&#8217;ll definitely staunch the bleeding from excess union influence.<\/p>\n<p>Want a better model? The answer &#8212; and it&#8217;s always a bad sign when you have to say this &#8212; is to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/10\/31\/world\/europe\/deutsche-post-reinvents-services-in-a-digital-world.html\" target=\"_blank\">follow Europe&#8217;s lead<\/a> and embrace full-tilt privatization.<\/p>\n<p>Kudos to Slate and Mr. Yglesias for at least leaning in the right direction. But the defect with this analysis &#8212; as with the Postal Service itself &#8212; is that the time for half-measures is well behind us.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Talk to most people who write about politics for a living long enough and you&#8217;ll find that there are certain topics that aggravate them far out of proportion to their ultimate significance. Some issues just get up your nose, even if they&#8217;ll never command a news cycle. For me, one of those issues is the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3729,3339,419,3338,3054],"class_list":["post-15300","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-mail-delivery","tag-privatization","tag-unions","tag-united-states-postal-service","tag-usps"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15300","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15300"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15300\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15323,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15300\/revisions\/15323"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15300"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15300"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15300"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}