{"id":15632,"date":"2012-08-27T15:18:13","date_gmt":"2012-08-27T19:18:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=15632"},"modified":"2012-08-27T16:04:58","modified_gmt":"2012-08-27T20:04:58","slug":"how-not-to-disprove-your-elitism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/15632\/how-not-to-disprove-your-elitism\/","title":{"rendered":"How NOT to Disprove Your Elitism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A remarkable exchange took place at the <em>New York Times <\/em>over the weekend. First, there was Arthur Brisbane, writing <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2012\/08\/26\/opinion\/sunday\/success-and-risk-as-the-times-transforms.html?_r=1\">his farewell column<\/a> as the <em>Times<\/em>&#8216; public editor (a position that is supposed to function as the in-house voice of journalistic conscience), which contained this telling passage:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 15.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Georgia;\">I &#8230; noted two years ago that I had taken up the public editor duties believing \u201cthere is no conspiracy\u201d and that The Times\u2019s output was too vast and complex to be dictated by any Wizard of Oz-like individual or cabal. I still believe that, but also see that the hive on Eighth Avenue is powerfully shaped by a culture of like minds \u2014 a phenomenon, I believe, that is more easily recognized from without than from within.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 15.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Georgia;\">When The Times covers a national presidential campaign, I have found that the lead editors and reporters are disciplined about enforcing fairness and balance, and usually succeed in doing so. Across the paper\u2019s many departments, though, so many share a kind of political and cultural progressivism \u2014 for lack of a better term \u2014 that this worldview virtually bleeds through the fabric of The Times.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 15.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Georgia;\">As a result, developments like the Occupy movement and gay marriage seem almost to erupt in The Times, overloved and undermanaged, more like causes than news subjects.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 15.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px Georgia;\">This truth, plain to even the most pedestrian observer of the <em>Times<\/em>, was too much for Executive Editor Jill Abramson to stomach, which led her to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/blogs\/media\/2012\/08\/nyts-abramson-rebuts-brisbane-charge-133211.html\" target=\"_blank\">go crying to <em>Politico<\/em>&#8216;s Dylan Beyers<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px 'Helvetica Neue'; color: #171717;\">&#8220;In our newsroom we are always conscious that the way we view an issue in New York is not necessarily the way it is viewed in the rest of the country or world. I disagree with Mr. Brisbane&#8217;s sweeping conclusions,&#8221; Abramson told POLITICO Saturday night.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px 'Helvetica Neue'; color: #171717;\">&#8220;I agree with another past public editor, Dan Okrent, and my predecessor as executive editor, Bill Keller, that in covering some social and cultural issues, the Times sometimes reflects its urban and cosmopolitan base,&#8221; she continued.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px 'Helvetica Neue'; color: #171717;\">There you have it. Journalism defined: &#8220;speaking truth to those who agree with you.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 12.0px 0.0px; font: 13.0px 'Helvetica Neue'; color: #171717;\">The <em>New York Times <\/em>is a publication that believes that what constitutes balanced coverage hinges on what ZIP code you&#8217;re in. They&#8217;re entitled to that belief. But they&#8217;re not entitled to a readership outside of the five boroughs &#8212; a fact that is only going to become more apparent to them with time.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A remarkable exchange took place at the New York Times over the weekend. First, there was Arthur Brisbane, writing his farewell column as the Times&#8216; public editor (a position that is supposed to function as the in-house voice of journalistic conscience), which contained this telling passage: I &#8230; noted two years ago that I had [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[3782,3783,2356,2355,251],"class_list":["post-15632","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-arthur-brisbane","tag-jill-abramason","tag-liberal-media","tag-media-bias","tag-new-york-times"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15632","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15632"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15632\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":15648,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15632\/revisions\/15648"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15632"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15632"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15632"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}