{"id":17041,"date":"2013-01-25T14:05:31","date_gmt":"2013-01-25T19:05:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=17041"},"modified":"2013-01-25T14:05:31","modified_gmt":"2013-01-25T19:05:31","slug":"more-fights-to-come-between-obama-and-courts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/17041\/more-fights-to-come-between-obama-and-courts\/","title":{"rendered":"More Fights to Come, Between Obama and Courts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tim is right that<a href=\"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/17034\/appellate-court-obama-recess-appointments-unconstitutional\/\" target=\"_blank\"> today&#8217;s DC Circuit Court ruling <\/a>on the NLRB appointments is &#8220;a humiliating rebuke for [Barack] Obama.&#8221; It also reads well, with solid textual analysis supporting its interpretation of the &#8220;Recess Clause.&#8221; That said, its holdings are so sweeping &#8212; both as to what constitutes &#8220;the Recess&#8221; of the Senate and as to what it means that a vacancy can be filled by such appointment (only) if it &#8220;happen[s]&#8221; during the Recess &#8212; that while they certainly make sense in law and logic, they may go <em>so<\/em> far as to violate enough existing practice as to make the full circuit <em>en banc<\/em> or the Supreme Court to reject the full scope of the ruling. Being a realist, I can certainly see a final result that narrows the scope of this ruling (and of it definition of &#8220;Recess&#8221; and &#8220;happen&#8221;), but that still throws out Obama&#8217;s appointments and still upholds the main thrust of today&#8217;s ruling, which is that there are serious limits to the &#8220;Recess appointment&#8221; power.<\/p>\n<p>But allow just a little further prediction. When the high court so rules, and Obama&#8217;s &#8220;humiliation&#8221; is confirmed, The One in the Oval Office will have a conniption fit. As it so happens, such a high court ruling will probably be just one in a series of about five or six key decisions in the next 18-24 months that will go directly against Obama administration arguments, actions, and abuses. Look, therefore, for Obama to resurrect his constitutionally dangerous, full-frontal assault against the Supreme Court and the courts in general, trying to undermine their very legitimacy. In fact, so unhinged may be Obama&#8217;s power lust that he might even try to openly defy an explicit Supreme Court ruling, maybe even citing Andrew Jackson&#8217;s infamous (perhaps apocryphal) statement from <em>Worcester v. Georgia<\/em> that the chief justice &#8220;has made his decision; now let him enforce it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In short, I see in this and other developing cases the potential for serious constitutional crisis, brought on by Obama&#8217;s authoritarian impulses. I hope I&#8217;m wrong.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tim is right that today&#8217;s DC Circuit Court ruling on the NLRB appointments is &#8220;a humiliating rebuke for [Barack] Obama.&#8221; It also reads well, with solid textual analysis supporting its interpretation of the &#8220;Recess Clause.&#8221; That said, its holdings are so sweeping &#8212; both as to what constitutes &#8220;the Recess&#8221; of the Senate and as [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[4013,833,24,92],"class_list":["post-17041","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-andrew-jackson","tag-nlrb","tag-obama","tag-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17041"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17041\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17042,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17041\/revisions\/17042"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}