{"id":21018,"date":"2014-07-03T19:14:15","date_gmt":"2014-07-03T23:14:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=21018"},"modified":"2014-07-03T19:16:55","modified_gmt":"2014-07-03T23:16:55","slug":"does-the-declaration-empower-govt-as-much-as-secure-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/21018\/does-the-declaration-empower-govt-as-much-as-secure-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"Does the Declaration Empower Govt as Much as Secure Rights?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>An allegedly misplaced period is causing at least one liberal academic to argue that the Declaration of Independence is as concerned with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2014\/07\/03\/us\/politics\/a-period-is-questioned-in-the-declaration-of-independence.html?_r=2\" target=\"_blank\">empowering government<\/a> as it is with securing individual rights.<\/p>\n<p>The argument runs like this. On the official transcript of the Declaration housed in the National Archives a period appears after the familiar phrase, \u201clife, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.\u201d However, the period doesn\u2019t appear on the earliest version of the document we have, nor does it occur on other reproductions.<\/p>\n<p>Removing the period changes the fundamental balance of government, argues Danielle Allen.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat errant spot of ink,\u201d summarizes the New York Times, \u201cshe believes, makes a difference, contributing to what she calls a \u2018routine but serious misunderstanding\u2019 of the document.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe period creates the impression that the list of self-evident truths ends with the right to \u2018life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,\u2019 she says. But as intended by Thomas Jefferson, she argues, what comes next is just as important: the essential role of governments \u2013 \u2018instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed\u2019 \u2013 in securing those rights.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>According to Professor Allen, \u201cThe logic moves from the value of individual rights to the importance of government as a tool for protecting those rights. You lose that connection when the period gets added.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>What we have here is a grammar czar masquerading as a political theorist.<\/p>\n<p>Whether or not the period is included, the logic of Jefferson\u2019s argument is the same: Individual rights precede the formation of government. In fact, the only reason governments are formed is to secure the enjoyment of these pre-existing rights; among these being life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.<\/p>\n<p>When a government becomes destructive of these ends, the people have the right to abolish the government and found a new one that will secure them. If Professor Allen and others will recall, the vast majority of the Declaration sets forth the reasons for dissolving the bonds between the British Empire and the American colonies before declaring the latter free, independent and self-governing.<\/p>\n<p>Allen\u2019s real project, though, is reading the Declaration as a collectivist document that empowers government to legislate equality. In a summary of her book <a href=\"http:\/\/books.wwnorton.com\/books\/Our-Declaration\/\" target=\"_blank\">Our Declaration: A Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality<\/a>, Allen tries to make the most out of her ink blot by arguing that \u201cIts list of self-evident truths does not end, as so many think, with our individual right to the \u2018pursuit of happiness\u2019 but with the collective right of the people to reform government so it will \u2018effect their Safety and Happiness.\u2019 The sentence laying out the self-evident truths leads us from the individual to the community \u2013 from our individual rights to what we can achieve only together, as a community constituted by bonds of equality.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s impossible to square Allen\u2019s interpretation with anything we know about the Declaration and the Founding. The Lockean theory driving the document puts individuals ahead of the group, and government \u2013 the largest expression of a group \u2013 at the service of the rights-bearing human person. If the group violates a person\u2019s God-given rights (i.e. the inalienable ones endowed by the Creator), the group loses.<\/p>\n<p>Going forward, it would be better if Professor Allen sticks to answering the marginally interesting question of the Declaration&#8217;s intended punctuation. Doing more &#8211; like trying to inject of a political philosophy into a blank space &#8211; risks making her contribution seem less important.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An allegedly misplaced period is causing at least one liberal academic to argue that the Declaration of Independence is as concerned with empowering government as it is with securing individual rights. The argument runs like this. On the official transcript of the Declaration housed in the National Archives a period appears after the familiar phrase, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":9,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[2833,3559,1069,4207,1916],"class_list":["post-21018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-declaration-of-independence","tag-equality","tag-liberty","tag-rights","tag-thomas-jefferson"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/9"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21018"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21018\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21028,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21018\/revisions\/21028"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}