{"id":2329,"date":"2009-11-25T12:31:32","date_gmt":"2009-11-25T17:31:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=2329"},"modified":"2009-11-25T12:46:44","modified_gmt":"2009-11-25T17:46:44","slug":"government-mandates-and-health-care","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/2329\/government-mandates-and-health-care\/","title":{"rendered":"Government Mandates and Health Care"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Much has been made about the proposed federal mandate that all individuals purchase health insurance.\u00a0  Some have called this mandate unconstitutional since the only constitutional justification could be the interstate commerce clause in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usconstitution.net\/xconst_A1Sec8.html\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Article I<\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Since standing around and not purchasing health care is hardly an act of interstate commerce, critics make a good point.\u00a0  The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) went one step further <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748704471504574439243760133458.html\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">in its criticism<\/span><\/a> of the mandate in 1994 when it noted that the individual mandate was \u201can unprecedented form of federal action.\u00a0  The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This year, Greg Dattilo and Dave Racer <a href=\"http:\/\/freemarkethealthcare.com\/images\/Mandates.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">conducted a study<\/span><\/a> of state and federal mandates.\u00a0  The results aren\u2019t too surprising when you consider that most government action fails to achieve the desired result, or leads to unintended consequences that harm other sectors of the economy.<\/p>\n<p>For example, auto insurance is mandatory in 47 states but the uninsured rate has held steady at 14.6 percent.\u00a0  In addition, the federal income tax is of course mandatory, but the non-compliance rate is still 14.7 percent.\u00a0  These individuals are all law breakers, to be sure, but mandating something doesn\u2019t make it so.<\/p>\n<p>I would propose a government mandate on happiness, prosperity and full employment.\u00a0  That could solve a lot of <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB125892118623059701.html\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">problems<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0  Perhaps a government mandate on earning at least $30,000 a year?\u00a0  The way the<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2009\/03\/18\/AR2009031802283.html\" target=\"_blank\"><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\"> FED is printing money<\/span><\/a>, that should be no problem.\u00a0  Maybe a government mandate for universal chocolate chip cookie access and subsequent ban on diabetes?<\/p>\n<p>Racer and Dattilo conclude:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If the goals of health reform are to reduce the uninsured rate, increase access to health care, and improve quality, forcing more people to sign up for health plans is not the answer.\u00a0  The CBO makes it very clear; people who are forced to own health insurance will, as a result, use more health services.\u00a0  That will increase overall health spending, put stress on the supply of health care services (reducing access) and not make a dent in quality.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Much has been made about the proposed federal mandate that all individuals purchase health insurance.\u00a0 Some have called this mandate unconstitutional since the only constitutional justification could be the interstate commerce clause in Article I. Since standing around and not purchasing health care is hardly an act of interstate commerce, critics make a good point.\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[40,557,556,12,311],"class_list":["post-2329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-congressional-budget-office","tag-dave-racer","tag-greg-dattilo","tag-health-care","tag-individual-mandate"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2329"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2329\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2332,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2329\/revisions\/2332"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}