{"id":4552,"date":"2010-04-01T10:25:56","date_gmt":"2010-04-01T15:25:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=4552"},"modified":"2010-04-01T10:27:41","modified_gmt":"2010-04-01T15:27:41","slug":"obama-administration-promotes-race-based-affirmative-action-in-university-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/4552\/obama-administration-promotes-race-based-affirmative-action-in-university-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Obama Administration Promotes Race-Based &#8220;Affirmative&#8221; Action in University Lawsuit"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>After a bloody Civil War that split the nation and killed 620,000, America sought to settle the divisive issue of race once and for all by amending the Constitution to explicitly guarantee &#8220;equal protection of the laws.&#8221;\u00a0 Despite that straightforward text, liberals during the past four decades have fomented the Orwellian idea that race-based unequal protection under the law somehow constitutes equal protection under the law.<\/p>\n<p>In a <a href=\"http:\/\/corner.nationalreview.com\/post\/?q=MmFiNWJkNDk4ZDliNjRmMTZiMjMyYzEyNTg5MWQwN2E=\" target=\"_blank\">brief filed this month<\/a> with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in <em>Fisher v. University of Texas<\/em>, the Obama Administration has unsurprisingly opted for the latter, supporting continuation of a racist admission system instead of equal rights.\u00a0 Currently, the university literally flags each applicant&#8217;s file based upon his or her race, in order to undertake what it deceptively labels a &#8220;holistic&#8221; evaluation process.\u00a0 In other words, admissions officers assess candidates&#8217; skin color in order to reach whatever racial result they sanctimoniously deem appropriate.<\/p>\n<p>A closely-divided United States Supreme Court sanctioned this discriminatory procedure in one of its more curious decisions of the past decade.\u00a0 In the 2003 <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&amp;court=US&amp;vol=539&amp;page=306\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Grutter v. Bollinger<\/em><\/a> decision, the Court ruled that universities could consider race as a &#8220;plus&#8221; factor to achieve what it called a &#8220;critical mass&#8221; of racial diversity.\u00a0 Preposterously, Justice Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor wrote that &#8220;we expect that 25 years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest approved today.&#8221;\u00a0 Well, that statement was made approximately 25 years after the Supreme Court condoned the same &#8220;holistic&#8221; race-based process in <a href=\"http:\/\/caselaw.lp.findlaw.com\/scripts\/getcase.pl?navby=CASE&amp;court=US&amp;vol=438&amp;page=265\" target=\"_blank\"><em>Regents of the University of California v. Bakke<\/em><\/a>, but somehow 25 more years were necessary.\u00a0 Moreover, seven years have passed since O&#8217;Connor made that statement, yet the issue remains just as divisive despite the election of an African-American President, of all things.<\/p>\n<p>What has changed since that date, however, is that Justice O&#8217;Connor has been replaced by Justice Samuel Alito.\u00a0 Accordingly, a majority may now exist to declare that &#8220;equal protection of the laws&#8221; means what it says, and fulfill Justice John Roberts&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/volokh.com\/posts\/1184684008.shtml\" target=\"_blank\">wise declaration<\/a> that &#8220;the way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After a bloody Civil War that split the nation and killed 620,000, America sought to settle the divisive issue of race once and for all by amending the Constitution to explicitly guarantee &#8220;equal protection of the laws.&#8221;\u00a0 Despite that straightforward text, liberals during the past four decades have fomented the Orwellian idea that race-based unequal [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[1042,1046,1045,1043,24,1044],"class_list":["post-4552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-affirmative-action","tag-college-admission","tag-discrimination","tag-fisher-v-university-of-texas","tag-obama","tag-reverse-discrimination"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4552"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4552\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4559,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4552\/revisions\/4559"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}