{"id":7241,"date":"2010-10-01T10:05:23","date_gmt":"2010-10-01T14:05:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=7241"},"modified":"2010-10-01T10:05:23","modified_gmt":"2010-10-01T14:05:23","slug":"stimulusfail-white-house-tries-to-issue-its-own-stimulus-report-card","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/7241\/stimulusfail-white-house-tries-to-issue-its-own-stimulus-report-card\/","title":{"rendered":"#stimulusfail:  White House Tries to Issue Its Own &#8220;Stimulus&#8221; Report Card"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>How&#8217;s this for drive-by media bias?\u00a0 Today&#8217;s <em>Washington Post<\/em> runs the deceptive headline <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/09\/30\/AR2010093007382.html?wpisrc=nl_politics\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Report Gives Stimulus Package High Marks.&#8221;<\/a> Hmmm.\u00a0 That sounds like a counterintuitive &#8220;Man Bites Dog&#8221; story worth reading.\u00a0 So who issued the report?\u00a0 The <em>Post&#8217;s<\/em> first paragraph admits that it comes from White House itself.\u00a0 Worse, it was overseen by that respected rock of good judgment and common sense, Vice President Joe Biden.<\/p>\n<p>Even with that baked-in bias, the White House report doesn&#8217;t seem to focus on how the $814 billion &#8220;stimulus&#8221; supposedly succeeded.\u00a0 Rather, it emphasizes how the effort has already distributed 70% of the allocated funds, and managed to avoid &#8220;the fraud charges that plague more routine government spending programs.&#8221;\u00a0 That&#8217;s it?\u00a0 That&#8217;s the best that even Joe Biden can claim?\u00a0 That should actually come as discouraging news, not encouraging news, to &#8220;stimulus&#8221; proponents.\u00a0 After all, if 70% of its funds have already been spent, but we still haven&#8217;t experienced its promised results, what remains other than $814 billion added to our nation&#8217;s debt?\u00a0 The White House promised that unemployment would top out twelve months ago at 8% if the bill passed, but we remain stuck at 9.6%.\u00a0 Instead of igniting our economic furnace, it has merely clouded growth and undermined the business and hiring climate.<\/p>\n<p>The White House and its apologists speculatively claim that the &#8220;stimulus&#8221; averted another great depression, but today&#8217;s <em>Wall Street Journal<\/em> carries an <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748704116004575522351201224286.html?mod=ITP_opinion_0\" target=\"_blank\">analysis<\/a> by former Senator Phil Gramm devastating that assertion.\u00a0 Gramm compares U.S. growth and employment figures to other developed countries that didn&#8217;t engage in the irresponsible &#8220;stimulus&#8221; profligacy we did, and shows that we lag far behind.\u00a0 As the Post story notes, Obama&#8217;s &#8220;stimulus&#8221; was &#8220;the largest effort in U.S. history to counteract the effects of a recession.&#8221;\u00a0 All it has done is prove once again that government doesn&#8217;t create jobs or growth, but economic uncertainty and debt.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>How&#8217;s this for drive-by media bias?\u00a0 Today&#8217;s Washington Post runs the deceptive headline &#8220;Report Gives Stimulus Package High Marks.&#8221; Hmmm.\u00a0 That sounds like a counterintuitive &#8220;Man Bites Dog&#8221; story worth reading.\u00a0 So who issued the report?\u00a0 The Post&#8217;s first paragraph admits that it comes from White House itself.\u00a0 Worse, it was overseen by that respected [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[860,59,19,24,179,105,71,28,44],"class_list":["post-7241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-biden","tag-deficit","tag-economy","tag-obama","tag-stimulus","tag-tax","tag-taxes","tag-tea-party","tag-white-house"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7241","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7241"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7241\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7242,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7241\/revisions\/7242"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}