{"id":9730,"date":"2011-05-18T10:43:16","date_gmt":"2011-05-18T14:43:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/?p=9730"},"modified":"2011-05-18T10:43:16","modified_gmt":"2011-05-18T14:43:16","slug":"a-hugely-important-judicial-nomination-fight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/9730\/a-hugely-important-judicial-nomination-fight\/","title":{"rendered":"A Hugely Important Judicial Nomination Fight"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Curt Levey at the Committee for Justice has <a href=\"http:\/\/committeeforjustice.blogspot.com\/2011\/05\/biggest-nomination-fight-of-2011-this.html\">the story<\/a>. Judicial nominee Goodwin Liu, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2010\/mar\/3\/a-constitutional-right-to-welfare\/\">radical<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtontimes.com\/news\/2010\/apr\/21\/liu-beholden-to-foreign-law\/\">dishonest<\/a>,\u00a0 is due for a Senate vote tomorrow. Levey suggests that a filibuster might be in order.<\/p>\n<p>I write here neither to advocate for, nor argue against, a permanent filibuster to kill this nomination. Others can decide whether Liu&#8217;s profound drawbacks amount to an &#8220;extraordinary circumstance&#8221; that allows a permanent filibuster under the terms of that sop to squishes, the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Gang_of_14\">Gang of Fourteen<\/a>. Instead, I write merely to remind people that there is another option that isn&#8217;t all-or-nothing. <a href=\"http:\/\/\">I wrote about i<\/a>t back when Elena Kagan was being considered for the Supreme Court. The other possibility is that of a temporary, time-limited filibuster (or series of cloture votes &#8212; perhaps two or three) designed to draw public attention to the matter and actually encourage lengthy debate in that light.<\/p>\n<p>What I wrote in terms of a Supreme Court nomination was this:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span>After demanding a full, fair hearing, they   should in turn allow a full, fair vote. But the latter should   depend upon the former, the public hearing and response before   the full and oh-so-final vote&#8230;. <\/span><span>Republicans showed in 2002 and 2004 that when judges become   campaign issues, Republicans win. Despite GOP hand-wringing,   evidence to the contrary is utterly nonexistent. Polls show that   the public supports originalist approaches to judging rather than   the &#8220;evolving Constitution&#8221; model. Polls show that the public, by   outright majorities or solid pluralities, also approves of the   usual policy results that happen to emerge from originalist   procedures: against partial birth abortion, against government   seizure of private property for other private use, against   judicially imposed homosexual marriage, against handgun bans,   against outright bans on all religious references in the public   square, against race-based admissions and job promotions, against   an ever-expansive federal government at the expense of the   states, against bureaucratic overreach, and especially against   coddling of criminals because of purely innocent procedural   errors by police. These are issues Americans care about, and they   are issues conservatives will always win on.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span>Judicial nominations are important.\u00a0 One way or another, they merit significant public attention.<br \/>\n<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Curt Levey at the Committee for Justice has the story. Judicial nominee Goodwin Liu, radical and dishonest,\u00a0 is due for a Senate vote tomorrow. Levey suggests that a filibuster might be in order. I write here neither to advocate for, nor argue against, a permanent filibuster to kill this nomination. Others can decide whether Liu&#8217;s [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":12,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[518,1607,2704,38],"class_list":["post-9730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-posts","tag-filibuster","tag-judge","tag-liu","tag-senate"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/12"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9730"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9734,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9730\/revisions\/9734"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cfif.org\/v\/freedom_line_blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}