This week marks the 40th anniversary of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, which deregulated American freight…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Happy 40th to the Staggers Rail Act, Which Deregulated and Saved the U.S. Rail Industry

This week marks the 40th anniversary of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980, which deregulated American freight rail and saved it from looming oblivion.

At the time of passage, the U.S. economy muddled along amid ongoing malaise, and our rail industry teetered due to decades of overly bureaucratic sclerosis.  Many other domestic U.S. industries had disappeared, and our railroads faced the same fate.  But by passing the Staggers Rail Act, Congress restored a deregulatory approach that in the 1980s allowed other U.S. industries to thrive.  No longer would government determine what services railroads could offer, their rates or their routes, instead restoring greater authority to the railroads themselves based upon cost-efficiency.

Today, U.S. rail flourishes even amid the coronavirus pandemic…[more]

October 13, 2020 • 11:09 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Give Warren a BS Degree in Vote-Buying Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, April 24 2019
Every dollar loaned inflates tuition by another 60 cents, according to Federal Reserve research.

Presidential contender Elizabeth Warren's strategy is to win the Democratic nomination by promising the most free stuff. Monday, she upped the ante. She's offering a whopping $50,000 student loan forgiveness for nearly everyone who borrowed for college or graduate school. That's old-fashioned Tammany Hall-style bribery  handing out dollars to buy votes.

Warren's proposal is designed to buy a lot of them. One in 6 American adults are saddled with college debt. It's bigger than credit card debt or auto loans. Magically erasing student debt is Warren's ploy to win over college students, adults in their 20s and 30s struggling with their loans and millions of parents left holding the bag.

Warren's giveaway will cost taxpayers $640 billion. It's a poke in the eye of every assembly line worker, waitress, truck driver and other taxpayer who never got to college because they went to work instead of going into debt. Why should they now have to pay someone else's college loans?

Sure, families swamped with college debts deserve sympathy. But Democrats aren't leveling with them or the public about what's causing this problem.

House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters tries to pin the blame on the banking industry. When Waters had several banking CEOs appearing before her committee, including JPMorgan Chase's Jamie Dimon and Citigroup's Michael Corbat, she demanded their plan to fix the student loan crisis. After an embarrassing silence, they had to remind her that banks no longer make student loans. The Obama administration took over student lending entirely in 2010.

In Monday's announcement, Warren tried to vilify the federal government for "pushing families that can't afford to pay the outrageous costs of higher education towards taking out loans." There's a sliver of truth to that, because Uncle Sam makes loans to virtually all comers, regardless of their ability to repay the money. But Warren leaves out the biggest culprits, the colleges themselves.

Colleges hike their tuition every year because they can. The feds have been willing to increase loan amounts to match whatever colleges charge. The result? Every dollar loaned inflates tuition by another 60 cents, according to Federal Reserve research.

In this heartless scheme, students are mules, carrying dollars from Washington, D.C., to campuses nationwide. Never mind if they ever graduate or land jobs to pay back their loans.

The more money colleges rake in, the more extravagantly they spend. Federal loans help bankroll exorbitant salaries for college presidents. The University of Louisville's president takes in nearly $4.3 million, while Columbia University's president gets $3.9 million. Awash with money, colleges spend way more on nonteaching staff than on teachers. Six-figure salaries for diversity officers, admissions and financial aid managers and layers on layers of other administrators, all on the gravy train.

Yet these high-priced administrators can't manage to get students to graduate. A shocking 34% of public college students can't make it through a four-year program in six years. They fail, still saddled with loans to repay.

Warren wants taxpayers to forgive up to $50,000 in loans for anyone earning under $100,000 a year, with smaller loan forgiveness for higher earners. That's the wrong idea.

Looking ahead, it would be fairer to require colleges to refund a portion of the loan money to Uncle Sam when a student doesn't make it to graduation. Colleges need to have skin in the game so they'll try harder to get students through the course of study and into the working world.

But don't expect to hear that kind of idea from Warren, herself a college professor and member of the ivory tower establishment. Instead, she's proposing more freebies. She's offering free tuition in all public colleges and universities, partly paid for by federal tax dollars and partly by the states  a huge unfunded mandate that will hit state taxpayers hard.

Finally, Warren warns that under her free college plan, all public institutions must admit students regardless of their immigration status or criminal record. Democrats are redefining themselves as the party of ex-cons, illegals and voters who want free stuff.


Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York State. 
COPYRIGHT 2019 CREATORS.COM

Question of the Week   
Which one of the following was the first 20th century presidential candidate to call for a Presidential Debate?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Joe Biden's tax proposals have gone through a variety of iterations over the course of his campaign, but lately, he's settled on a pledge not to raise taxes on those earning under $400,000.This pledge is not consistent with his current proposals, but he's even less likely to be constrained if he's elected president.Even if Biden claims he would not directly raise income tax rates on those earning…[more]
 
 
—The Editors, Washington Examiner
— The Editors, Washington Examiner
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe you will be better off over the next four years with Joe Biden as president or with Donald Trump as president?