In our Liberty Update this week, we highlight the latest illegal leak of thousands of supposedly confidential…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
ProPublica/IRS Leak: There's No Underlying "There" There

In our Liberty Update this week, we highlight the latest illegal leak of thousands of supposedly confidential Internal Revenue Service (IRS) taxpayer returns spanning over 15 years, confirming that the partisan and power-hungry IRS simply cannot be trusted to safeguard our sensitive records, let alone to begin collecting sensitive private information from nonprofit organizations on donors who contribute to them in violation of the First Amendment.

Getting to the substance of the ProPublica/IRS leaked documents themselves, former Senator Phil Gramm and U.S. Policy Metrics partner Mike Solon explain in The Wall Street Journal how there's nothing scandalous in the least in what they reveal:

ProPublica’s 'blockbuster' story showing that the wealthy 'pay income taxes that are only…[more]

June 18, 2021 • 04:40 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
The Many Dangers of Voting By Mail Print
By Byron York
Wednesday, July 22 2020
Recent primaries have shown beyond any doubt that it is susceptible to crippling dysfunction, and that is bad enough.

President Trump has said many times that voting by mail  which will play a big role in this November's presidential election  is vulnerable to fraud. "There is tremendous evidence of fraud whenever you have mail-in ballots," Trump has noted. The November election, he added, "will be, in my opinion, the most corrupt election in the history of our country."

Democrats and many in the press have pushed back hard. Trump's claims are "false" and "baseless" and "preposterous" and "debunked," they said. Voting by mail is safe and reliable.

But the fight over fraud could be a distraction from a very real and serious danger of voting by mail. The country has just seen some very troubling examples of massive dysfunction in elections in which voting by mail played a big role. If anything like that happens in even a few states in November, there would be big trouble.

Recently, The New York Times published a story, "3 Weeks After Primary, N.Y. Officials Still Can't Say Who Won Key Races." The article outlined enormous difficulties with voting by mail in three congressional races  New York's 12th, 15th and 16th congressional districts. 

"The absentee ballot count  greatly inflated this year after the state expanded the vote-by-mail option because of the coronavirus pandemic  has been painstakingly slow, and hard to track, with no running account of the vote totals available," the Times reported.

In the 12th district, the situation is absolutely crazy. There were 65,000 absentee ballots in the race. Only a few have been counted  the primary was June 23. But 1 in 5  roughly 13,000 ballots  have been disqualified for various reasons. The leader's margin is 648 votes at the moment. 

Of course, there are lawsuits. One candidate has taken the Board of Elections to federal court, seeking an order that all ballots mailed by June 30  one week after election day  be counted, whether or not they have a postmark. The losers, of course, will cry that voters were "disenfranchised" by rules on when vote-by-mail ballots have to be received.

Now, imagine these problems in a presidential election, with the white-hot passions it will create. Say, just for the sake of argument, that there is not even a hint of fraud in the vote counting. But if there are important areas where very few votes have been counted three weeks after Election Day, where there is no way to track which votes have been counted and which haven't, and there is great confusion about how the job will ever get done  well, that will be a huge problem. Chaos could descend, with no resolution of the presidential election. In the absence of a reliable vote total, both candidates might proclaim victory.

"Americans might spend Christmas wondering which self-claimed president-elect will prevail in court," warned The Wall Street Journal editorial page.

It is something to be deeply concerned about, whether or not one believes vote-by-mail is susceptible to fraud. Recent primaries have shown beyond any doubt that it is susceptible to crippling dysfunction, and that is bad enough. (And of course, there are allegations of fraud  four men have been charged in connection with May's special election in Paterson, New Jersey, after hundreds of ballots were found in a mailbox there.)

Meanwhile, a new ABC News/Washington Post poll shows the public has great doubts about voting by mail. To the question "How would you prefer to vote in the presidential election  by mail or in person?" 59% of respondents said in person, while just 38% said by mail. Then pollsters asked, "Do you think mail-in voting is vulnerable to significant levels of fraud or do you think it has adequate protections against significant levels of fraud?" Forty-nine percent said it is vulnerable to fraud, while 43% said it has adequate protections (7% had no opinion).

People are right to be worried. When someone tells you that voting by mail is nothing to worry about, be skeptical.


Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner.
COPYRIGHT 2020 BYRON YORK

Quiz Question   
What was the highest year-over-year inflation rate since the consumer price index has been used to calculate it?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"For the past year, liberals unleashed on the nation an avalanche of ideological nonsense, coupled with brutal pressure to conform. Those who bucked the party line found themselves canceled and unpersoned and had their opinions subjected to mockery and claims of delusion and 'anti-science' prejudices.Until now. Because the tide is turning. And sometimes the break from the party line comes from surprising…[more]
 
 
—Glenn Harlan Reynolds, InstaPundit.com Founder and Univ. of Tennessee Professor of Law
— Glenn Harlan Reynolds, InstaPundit.com Founder and Univ. of Tennessee Professor of Law
 
Liberty Poll   

Are your local schools currently facing open debate with parents regarding the introduction of radical leftist ideological positions into the curricula?