CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: U.S. Internet Speeds Skyrocketed After Ending Failed Title II "Net Neutrality" Experiment

CFIF often highlights how the Biden Administration's bizarre decision to resurrect failed Title II "Net Neutrality" internet regulation, which caused private broadband investment to decline for the first time ever outside of a recession during its brief experiment at the end of the Obama Administration, is a terrible idea that will only punish consumers if allowed to take effect.

Here's what happened after that brief experiment was repealed under the Trump Administration and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Ajit Pai - internet speeds skyrocketed despite late-night comedians' and left-wing activists' warnings that the internet was doomed:

[caption id="" align="aligncenter" width="515"] Internet Speeds Post-"Net Neutrality"[/caption]

 …[more]

April 19, 2024 • 09:51 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
CFIF Urges Support of the American Music Fairness Act Print
By CFIF Staff
Friday, December 02 2022

In a letter sent today to members of the House Judiciary Committee, the Center for Individual Freedom ("CFIF") reiterated its support of H.R. 4130, the American Music Fairness Act.  

Read the entire letter below.


December 2, 2022

United States House of Representatives
Committee on the Judiciary 
2138 Rayburn House Office Building 
Washington, D.C.  20515 

Dear House Committee on the Judiciary Members and Staff:  

On behalf of the Center for Individual Freedom (hereinafter “CFIF”) and over 300,000 supporters and activists across the nation, I write in support of H.R. 4130, the American Music Fairness Act.  

Since America’s founding, intellectual property protections have provided the foundation for our nation’s unmatched innovation, prosperity and growth.  Our Founding Fathers specifically crafted Article I, Section 8 to grant Congress the authority “To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”  They knew that innovation is critical to economic growth and quality of life, and that the only way to fully encourage innovation is to reward and protect it.  

As a direct result, from the first days of the phonograph, through the jazz age, through the rock era, through disco, through country, through hip-hop and every other popular musical iteration since its advent, it’s not by accident that we lead the world in the same manner in which we lead in such industries as cinema and television programming.  We can thank our nation’s emphasis on strong copyright protections.  America’s legacy of unparalleled copyright protection and free market orientation have cultivated a music industry unrivaled in today’s world or throughout human history.  

Unfortunately, federal law regarding performing artists’ rights currently fails to uphold that legacy.  

Specifically, existing law secures royalty payments for songwriters and others when their songs are played on AM-FM terrestrial radio, but not for the performing artists themselves.  Deepening that odd paradox, performance artists receive compensation when their songs play on digital broadcast platforms like the internet, satellite and cable.  Terrestrial radio broadcasters, however, somehow remain exempt under existing law from having to pay that same compensation.  There’s no logical or legal justification for that paradox, which amounts to crony capitalism in the form of a special government carve-out.  

The American Music Fairness Act would finally correct that anomaly and secure performance rights for artists whose recordings are played on terrestrial radio (with exceptions maintained for smaller “mom-and-pop” stations).  In 2021, we at CFIF joined numerous fellow conservative and libertarian organizations in a coalition letter to the House amplifying the need to pass this legislation to protect artists’ natural intellectual property (IP) rights:  

The Constitution protects intellectual property rights and specifically delegates to Congress authority to protect creative works.  Artists who produce music therefore have the right to protect their intellectual property, including both the writer and performer of a given recording.  When a given work is transmitted, common sense and basic fairness dictate that the medium of transmission should not affect the existence of these rights.  Yet, under the current regime, a performer does not hold effective or enforceable rights to his or her product when it is distributed through terrestrial radio.  

Opponents of the American Music Fairness Act illogically suggest that it would somehow introduce needless market regulation, but the obvious reality is that the market is already regulated in the discriminatory manner described above.  The American Music Fairness Act would merely level the playing field and respect the value of the artists’ works.  

Opponents of H.R. 4130 also falsely attempt to portray it as creating a “tax.”  That is simply inaccurate.  Whereas taxes are compulsory payments to government, royalties are voluntary payments to broadcast others’ creations.  This bill relates to royalties, not taxes.  

By any standard of fairness and logic, performing artists possess a natural right to enjoy the fruits of their labor and creativity, just like any of us do for our work.  After all, artists already receive performance payments from non-terrestrial radio stations, reflecting the value of their work.  The American Music Fairness Act simply corrects an unfair and illogical federal carve-out.  

Accordingly, we urge you to support this long-overdue legislation.  Thank you very much for your attention to this important matter, and please contact me at your convenience with any questions or comments.  

Sincerely,  
/s/
Timothy Lee 
Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs 
 
Notable Quote   
 
"A top rabbi at Columbia University and Barnard College is telling students to go home 'as soon as possible,' and remain there for their own safety at this time after anti-Israel protesters attacked Jews and hurled antisemitic threats at them.'What we are witnessing in and around campus is terrible and tragic. The events of the last few days, especially last night, have made it clear that Columbia…[more]
 
 
— Madeleine Hubbard, Just the News
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you mostly approve or mostly disapprove of U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson's plan to introduce foreign aid packages for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan before legislation on U.S. border security?