As we at CFIF often highlight, strong intellectual property (IP) rights - including patent rights -…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Senate Must Support Strong Patent Rights, Not Erode Them

As we at CFIF often highlight, strong intellectual property (IP) rights - including patent rights - constitute a core element of "American Exceptionalism" and explain how we became the most inventive, prosperous, technologically advanced nation in human history.  Our Founding Fathers considered IP so important that they explicitly protected it in the text of Article I of the United States Constitution.

Strong patent rights also explain how the U.S. accounts for an incredible two-thirds of all new lifesaving drugs introduced worldwide.

Elected officials must therefore work to protect strong IP and patent rights, not undermine them.   Unfortunately, several anti-patent bills currently before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee this week threaten to do exactly…[more]

April 02, 2025 • 08:29 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
The FDA Can Save Lives by Keeping Copycat Drugs Off the Market Print
By Stephen Moore
Tuesday, March 18 2025
The FDA should cut off access to these fake and unsafe drugs and allow the normal patent process to work to protect our intellectual property.

For decades, the United States has led the world in pharmaceutical innovation  developing drugs that combat cancer, heart disease, AIDS, diabetes and other killer diseases. One recent study found that "in health-sciences output in the Nature Index, the United States' Share is almost 8,500, higher than the next 10 leading countries combined."

The industry's research and development has saved and improved tens of millions of lives in the U.S. alone and perhaps 10 times that number around the world. Yet somehow Washington has come to regard the industry as a villain.

The newest U.S. wonder drug  Zepbound  is extraordinarily effective in driving major weight loss. This drug is now being used by millions of people  about 70% of Americans are overweight  and contributing to an improvement in the country's health. Users of the drug treatments, which suppress appetite, typically lose 10%-20% of their body weight after taking the shots. This miracle drug is reducing lives lost from obesity, heart disease, cancer and stress  while allowing millions of Americans to become more active and feel better about themselves.

Here's the problem: The cost of developing new drugs and getting them approved typically exceeds $2 billion  and takes 10-15 years  according to the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. (There's also a high failure rate  90% of drugs that reach the clinical trial phase never come to market.)

For every drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration, there are nearly a dozen that fail and lose money for investors. The rare wonder drug "hits" have to pay off to cover the cost of the much more common dead-end research  the "misses."

The future of American drug innovation is threatened by U.S. regulations that permit knockoff versions of new drugs to be sold to U.S. consumers.

Today, companies known as "compounders" specialize in creating these knockoffs  and cashing in along the way. They generated nearly $5 billion in revenues in 2023.

Compounders freeload off the high R&D costs and slow approval times associated with developing new drugs. Instead, they modify patented, FDA-approved medicines by adding an additional ingredient or tinkering with the doses and then mass-produce knockoffs. But there is no science supporting this trickery in the case of the weight-loss drugs.

Many of these "copycat" drugs are imported from China  the nation that has routinely run roughshod over American patent rights.

The weight-loss drugs were so successful that demand outstripped supply. The FDA determined there was a shortage of Ozempic and Wegovy and allowed the copycat drugs access to the market.

But there is no shortage today. The FDA moved those weight-loss drugs off their shortage list but gave compounding pharmacies an extra 60-90 days to stop producing their drugs.

This was an undeserved gift that rewards the knockoffs to the tune of millions of dollars (mostly to the Chinese) while penalizing the companies that did the hard and expensive work of creating these drugs and getting them approved. The same FDA that endlessly delays approving drugs gives a free pass to the counterfeit drugs.

Copycat drugs can save consumers money in the short term. But the societal cost of the signals this sends to the pharmaceutical industry could be devastating. It will surely cause delays and defunding of urgently needed medical research in areas like multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's, brain cancer and epilepsy, to name just a few.

Tomas Philipson of the University of Chicago has proven that drug price controls to keep costs low only curtail the advance of new drugs and kill many more people in the long run than they save. Philipson concludes that "compounding as currently performed violates the exclusivity granted ... by patents and therefore shrinks the market for new innovation."

The FDA should cut off access to these fake and unsafe drugs and allow the normal patent process to work to protect our intellectual property. Patent protection is what has made America the leading disease combatant of the world and what will speed along the next generation of lifesaving drugs.


Stephen Moore is a visiting fellow at the Heritage Foundation. He is also an economic advisor to the Trump campaign. His new book, coauthored with Arthur Laffer, is "The Trump Economic Miracle."

COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"Will this law review article 'promote DEI values'? Does it cite scholars from 'underrepresented groups'? Will it have 'any foreseeable impact in enhancing diversity, equity, and inclusion'? And why did one team of editors solicit 'only white, male authors'?Those are some of the questions that editors at the Harvard Law Review asked in internal documents obtained by the Washington Free Beacon. The…[more]
 
 
— Aaron Sibarium, Washington Free Beacon
 
Liberty Poll   

Should any "peace" agreement with Iran specifically and unconditionally force the country to halt all nuclear development?