The history of government price-control policies that seek to impose price ceilings on goods and services…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Ramirez Cartoon: Drug Price Control Poison

The history of government price-control policies that seek to impose price ceilings on goods and services is both long and replete with failure. That’s because price controls discourage innovation and investment, and lead to shortages in the marketplace, among other unintended consequences.

No targeted industry is immune from the predictable negative impacts of prices controls – not even prescription drugs, which seem to be a primary target in the price-control crosshairs of policymakers at all levels of government.

In his latest cartoon, two-time Pulitzer Prize winner Michael Ramirez sums up the negative consequences of prescription drug price control policies – whether they take the form of direct price caps, “negotiated” Medicare and other prices, or Most Favored Nation…[more]

May 28, 2025 • 01:05 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Stop the Litigation-Industrial Complex's War Against Trump
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, March 26 2025
On Monday, the Trump administration struck back at the legal-industrial complex's war against MAGA. President Donald Trump's Justice Department filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to take a stand on the "epidemic" of national injunctions that leftist district court judges are using to halt the Trump agenda. Trump's lawyers said on Monday that only the Supreme Court can stop this "power grab." The success of Trump's presidency could hinge on whether the court will come down hard on this cozy collusion between anti-Trump litigants and injunction-happy judges.…
 
Trump Should End the Biden-Era War on Small Business Partnerships
President Donald Trump has promised to create millions of new high-paying jobs. One easy first step to…
Read more...
Invest in Education, Not the Department of Education
If an investment yields stagnant or negative returns despite increased funding, the rational thing to…
Read more...
 
Alarming: Public Support for Israel Falls Below 50%
According to Gallup, fewer than half of all Americans now sympathize with Israelis versus the Palestinians. …
Read more...
Trump Polling Better Than Democrats Fighting Over How To Fight Him
There are a lot of questions these days about poll numbers, both President Donald Trump's and those of…
Read more...
 
The FDA Can Save Lives by Keeping Copycat Drugs Off the Market
For decades, the United States has led the world in pharmaceutical innovation – developing…
Read more...
New Legal Analysis Supports Constitutionality of Innovative Policing Technologies Helping Solve Crimes in America
"When appropriate guardrails are in place, License Plate Reader (LPR) technology does not violate…
Read more...
 
Good Riddance, Mahmoud Khalil
On the same day that Islamic State terrorist Shamsud-Din Jabbar murdered 15 Americans by plowing a car…
Read more...
Coldest Winter in Over Ten Years Further Erodes Climate “Expert” Credibility
The same sort of “experts” who assured us that Hunter Biden’s laptop was “Russian…
Read more...
 
Will Defense Spending Avoid the Scalpel Again?
Since the 1950s, every effort to reduce the size and scope of government has been bulldozed by a political…
Read more...
Want to Soak the Rich? Tax University Endowments.
Republicans are searching for ways to "pay for" their tax cuts. Democrats want the rich to…
Read more...
Notable Quote   
 
"California Gov. Gavin Newsom just lost a major ruling in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which ruled that President Donald Trump is likely to prevail in his deployment of National Guard troops. Newsom and various Democratic politicians have insisted that Trump's order is unlawful and that Newsom has to agree to any request for deployment. The Ninth Circuit ruled on Thursday…[more]
 
 
— Jonathan Turley, Fox News Media Contributor and the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
 
Liberty Poll   

Is it even rational to believe that Iran's nuclear weapon ambitions can be conclusively ended without Iranian regime change?