Joe Biden's inexorable march toward the fanatical left continued this week, as he and Bernie Sanders…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Biden Drug Plan Would Slash Innovation and U.S. Consumer Access

Joe Biden's inexorable march toward the fanatical left continued this week, as he and Bernie Sanders (D - Vermont) introduced their "unity platform" in anticipation of this year's Democratic convention.  We can thus add weaker U.S. patents and drug price controls imported from foreign nations to Biden's existing dumpster fire of bad ideas.

Here's the problem.  As we've often emphasized, and contrary to persistent myth, American consumers enjoy far greater access to new lifesaving drugs than people in other nations, including those in "other advanced economies" (Biden's words) whose price controls Biden seeks to import:

Of all new cancer drugs developed worldwide between 2011 and 2018, 96% were available to American consumers.  Meanwhile, only 56% of those drugs became available in Canada…[more]

July 10, 2020 • 04:52 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's CourtroomLegal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts.
Home Press Room Free Market Groups to Super Committee: Voluntary Spectrum Auctions, Not Mandatory Spectrum Taxes
Free Market Groups to Super Committee: Voluntary Spectrum Auctions, Not Mandatory Spectrum Taxes Print
Wednesday, November 09 2011

The Center for Individual Freedom today joined with 10 other free market organizations in sending a letter to the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (aka the Super Committee) that urges its members to reject President Obama’s proposed $4.8 billion spectrum tax that would hit wireless consumers.  The organizations, instead, urged the Committee to include voluntary incentive auctions for spectrum in its recommendations to cut the deficit.

The letter, which was organized by Americans for Tax Reform’s Digital Liberty project, can be read below.


U.S. Congress
Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction
Washington, D.C. 20515

 RE: Spectrum and Deficit Reduction

Dear Members of the Joint Select Committee,

We are writing to address spectrum policy as it pertains to recommendations for deficit reduction. While we support establishing voluntary incentive auctions for spectrum, we are vehemently opposed to the proposed spectrum tax outlined in Section 278 of the President’s American Jobs Act.

The spectrum tax, one of 14 proposed tax hikes in the American Jobs Act, would give the Federal Communications Commission the authority to raise a minimum of $4.8 billion over the course of 10 years. Targeted at holders of licensed spectrum, the tax will inevitably hit consumers using mobile phones, tablets, and other wireless services.

The proposed spectrum tax would stifle innovation. The wireless industry is face-to-face with a looming spectrum crunch. Making spectrum licenses more expensive will certainly not help bring more spectrum to the market. Instead, a new tax on spectrum will dig into the investment pot for research and development, slowing the pace of innovation. The outcome would also be detrimental to consumers, who could face higher prices or see delayed service improvements and high-speed broadband build-out.

While a spectrum tax should be off the table, voluntary incentive auctions can and should be included in the recommendations the Committee puts forth. A well-structured spectrum auction can raise as much as $25 billion according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate. In order to maximize this revenue and ensure efficient spectrum usage, the measure should restrain the FCC from imposing licensing conditions or restrictions. We also urge the Committee to review ways to auction valuable spectrum held inefficiently by federal agencies, such as a recent proposal by Sen. Mark Kirk.

Spectrum has a place in the recommendations the Joint Select Committee puts forth to reduce the deficit. Voluntary incentive auction authority – and not a new spectrum tax – can both reduce the deficit and free up spectrum to foster continued innovation, benefit consumers, and address a looming spectrum crunch.

Sincerely,

Grover Norquist
President
Americans for Tax Reform

Tom Schatz
President
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Andrew Moylan
Vice President of Government Affairs
National Taxpayers Union

Ryan Radia
Associate Director of Technology Studies
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Steve Pociask
President
American Consumer Institute

John Stephenson
Director, Telecommunications and Information Technology Task Force
American Legislative Exchange Council

Hance Haney
Director and Senior Fellow
Discovery Institute

Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom

Kelly William Cobb
Executive Director
Digital Liberty

Seton Motley
President
Less Government

Wayne Brough
Chief Economist and Vice President of Research
FreedomWorks 

Related Articles :
Question of the Week   
In which one of the following years was the National Park Service established?
More Questions
Quote of the Day   
 
"Allowing third parties to collect election ballots, a term sometimes called 'ballot harvesting,' is unconstitutional if it creates 'wide opportunity for fraud,' Trump campaign senior legal adviser Jenna Ellis says.'I think that ballot harvesting is definitely opening up a ripe opportunity for fraud,' Ellis told Just the News in an interview, while acknowledging there is no language in the Constitution…[more]
 
 
—Carrie Sheffield, Just the News White House Correspondent
— Carrie Sheffield, Just the News White House Correspondent
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you currently expect your local schools to reopen on time in the fall?