Today, the House Oversight Committee is holding an important hearing entitled "The Role of Pharmacy…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
House Hearing Spotlights Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) as Drivers of Higher Drug Prices

Today, the House Oversight Committee is holding an important hearing entitled "The Role of Pharmacy Benefit Managers in Prescription Drug Markets Part III:  Transparency and Accountability."

For those unfamiliar, Pharmacy Benefit Managers (PBMs) amount to middlemen that control prescription drugs for millions of Americans.  A majority of Americans receive health insurance through employer plans or government programs such as Medicare, which in turn cover prescription drugs through PBMs.  Those PBMs negotiate with drug companies and pay pharmacies, but throughout the process determine the drugs that insured patients may obtain and at what cost.

The problem is that PBMs operate in such an opaque and complex manner that they're able to inflate drug costs while claiming to be working…[more]

July 23, 2024 • 04:57 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Press Room Free Market Groups to Super Committee: Voluntary Spectrum Auctions, Not Mandatory Spectrum Taxes
Free Market Groups to Super Committee: Voluntary Spectrum Auctions, Not Mandatory Spectrum Taxes Print
Wednesday, November 09 2011

The Center for Individual Freedom today joined with 10 other free market organizations in sending a letter to the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction (aka the Super Committee) that urges its members to reject President Obama’s proposed $4.8 billion spectrum tax that would hit wireless consumers.  The organizations, instead, urged the Committee to include voluntary incentive auctions for spectrum in its recommendations to cut the deficit.

The letter, which was organized by Americans for Tax Reform’s Digital Liberty project, can be read below.


U.S. Congress
Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction
Washington, D.C. 20515

 RE: Spectrum and Deficit Reduction

Dear Members of the Joint Select Committee,

We are writing to address spectrum policy as it pertains to recommendations for deficit reduction. While we support establishing voluntary incentive auctions for spectrum, we are vehemently opposed to the proposed spectrum tax outlined in Section 278 of the President’s American Jobs Act.

The spectrum tax, one of 14 proposed tax hikes in the American Jobs Act, would give the Federal Communications Commission the authority to raise a minimum of $4.8 billion over the course of 10 years. Targeted at holders of licensed spectrum, the tax will inevitably hit consumers using mobile phones, tablets, and other wireless services.

The proposed spectrum tax would stifle innovation. The wireless industry is face-to-face with a looming spectrum crunch. Making spectrum licenses more expensive will certainly not help bring more spectrum to the market. Instead, a new tax on spectrum will dig into the investment pot for research and development, slowing the pace of innovation. The outcome would also be detrimental to consumers, who could face higher prices or see delayed service improvements and high-speed broadband build-out.

While a spectrum tax should be off the table, voluntary incentive auctions can and should be included in the recommendations the Committee puts forth. A well-structured spectrum auction can raise as much as $25 billion according to a Congressional Budget Office estimate. In order to maximize this revenue and ensure efficient spectrum usage, the measure should restrain the FCC from imposing licensing conditions or restrictions. We also urge the Committee to review ways to auction valuable spectrum held inefficiently by federal agencies, such as a recent proposal by Sen. Mark Kirk.

Spectrum has a place in the recommendations the Joint Select Committee puts forth to reduce the deficit. Voluntary incentive auction authority – and not a new spectrum tax – can both reduce the deficit and free up spectrum to foster continued innovation, benefit consumers, and address a looming spectrum crunch.

Sincerely,

Grover Norquist
President
Americans for Tax Reform

Tom Schatz
President
Council for Citizens Against Government Waste

Andrew Moylan
Vice President of Government Affairs
National Taxpayers Union

Ryan Radia
Associate Director of Technology Studies
Competitive Enterprise Institute

Steve Pociask
President
American Consumer Institute

John Stephenson
Director, Telecommunications and Information Technology Task Force
American Legislative Exchange Council

Hance Haney
Director and Senior Fellow
Discovery Institute

Jeffrey Mazzella
President
Center for Individual Freedom

Kelly William Cobb
Executive Director
Digital Liberty

Seton Motley
President
Less Government

Wayne Brough
Chief Economist and Vice President of Research
FreedomWorks 

Related Articles :
Notable Quote   
 
"The astonishing political events of the last four weeks make plain, once again, how much of America's history depends on what voters have come to accept as the choice of one person: each presidential nominee's choice of a vice presidential candidate. Even as the nomination process was expanded, half a century ago, to include millions of primary voters, the choice of the vice presidential nominee…[more]
 
 
— Michael Barone, Senior Political Analyst for the Washington Examiner and Longtime Co-Author of The Almanac of American Politics
 
Liberty Poll   

Should Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle be fired for the agency's unconscionable failures regarding the assassination attempt on President Trump?