In this week's Liberty Update we highlight the potentially catastrophic threat of H.R. 3, the healthcare…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Notable Quote: WSJ on H.R. 3, Biden & Pelosi's Dangerous Healthcare Bill

In this week's Liberty Update we highlight the potentially catastrophic threat of H.R. 3, the healthcare and drug price control bill that Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi are attempting to rush through Congress.  The Wall Street Journal helpfully offers further insight this morning on how H.R. 3 would threaten lifesaving U.S. pharmaceutical innovation and leadership, including on things like the Covid vaccines:

Companies that refuse the government’s price must pay a 95% excise tax on all revenue they generate from that drug in the U.S.  They’d also have to offer the government price to private insurers.  There’s no “negotiation” when a gun is pointed at your head.  A new study in the Journal of the American Medical Association estimates that drug spending in the U.S. would…[more]

September 23, 2021 • 10:23 AM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Home Press Room CFIF Reiterates Concerns Regarding Proposals to Restructure Nation's Air Traffic Control (ATC) System
CFIF Reiterates Concerns Regarding Proposals to Restructure Nation's Air Traffic Control (ATC) System Print
Thursday, February 09 2017

February 9, 2017 

The Honorable Bill Shuster                                     The Honorable Peter DeFazio 
Chairman                                                                Ranking Member 
House Transportation and Infrastructure                House Transportation and Infrastructure
Committee                                                               Committee 
U.S.  House of Representatives                              U.S. House of Representatives 
2251 Rayburn House Office Building                      2134 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C.  20515                                        Washington, D.C. 20515 

The Honorable Rick Larsen                                    The Honorable Frank LoBiondo 
House Transportation and Infrastructure                House Transportation and Infrastructure 
Committee                                                               Committee 
U.S. House of Representatives                               U.S. House of Representatives 
2113 Rayburn House Office Building                      2427 Rayburn House Office Building 
Washington, D.C.  20515                                        Washington, D.C.  20515 


Dear Chairman Shuster, Ranking Member DeFazio, Representative Larsen, and Representative LoBiondo: 

On behalf of over 250,000 supporters and activists across the nation, the Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF) reiterates our deep concerns regarding leading proposals to restructure the nation's air traffic control (ATC) system. 

In that vein, please find the coalition letter from August of last year that details many of those concerns here

Since that letter, the Defense Department stated just last week that creating a separate new ATC organization "raises serious concerns."  In its analysis, the Pentagon said, "The establishment of a new entity separate from the FAA raises serious concerns regarding the disposition of certain unique National Defense procedures, programs and policy."  It noted, "It is significant to note that the DOD relies on FAA 'command and control' capabilities in the execution of the national defense mission." 

Additionally, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) determined last year that creation of a nonprofit ATC corporation would widen the federal budget deficit by $20 billion between 2017 and 2026, and increase net direct spending by an alarming $90 billion over that same period.  Separately, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) also determined that the proposed ATC restructuring may delay implementation of the NextGen air transportation system while necessary new safety oversight procedures were developed. 

Although proponents of the current ATC restructuring proposal characterize it as "privatization," it isn't actual privatization at all.  Rather, it would create a federally-chartered nonprofit corporation that repeats the mistakes of previous public/private entities like Amtrak or the U.S. Postal Service.  The ATC proposal maintains monopoly power over air traffic control while continuing or expanding benefits for the current union of federal air traffic controllers.  That alone undermines the primary benefit that true privatization would provide, the ability to eliminate inefficiencies of government bureaucracy in favor of competition and free-market choice.  Indeed, the ATC proposal might actually weaken restraints on unionized air traffic controllers in such areas as personnel changes, salary limits and the current mandatory retirement age of 56 (compared to the retirement age of 65 for pilots themselves), which explains why the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) strongly favors the proposal.

We also remain concerned that the proposed new ATC entity would possess the power to levy new taxes and user fees without Congressional oversight or competition that true privatization would provide, which could result in skyrocketing travel costs for the consumers you represent. 

Thank you very much for your attention to this extremely important matter. 

Sincerely, 
/s/
Timothy Lee 
Senior Vice President of Legal and Public Affairs 

Related Articles :
Quiz Question   
What is the single deadliest disease epidemic to the U.S. population in history?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"The House will vote Thursday on the Senate-passed bipartisan infrastructure bill, pushing back an originally planned vote for Monday that Democratic moderates had demanded as part of a deal with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).Lawmakers will still debate the bill on the House floor on Monday, but the actual vote will be pushed to Sept. 30, when some surface transportation programs are set to expire…[more]
 
 
—Cristina Marcos, The Hill
— Cristina Marcos, The Hill
 
Liberty Poll   

Pres. Biden is seeking IRS authority to monitor every American financial transaction exceeding $600. Is there any legitimate government reason you can think of for such micro-monitoring of individual financial transactions?