|
91 |
George Will Encourages Judicial Tyranny Through "Substantive Due Process"
An excessively deferential judiciary constitutes a threat to liberty. But so does an excessively aggressive judiciary.
Unfortunately, George Will, perhaps the leading beacon of conservative thought, performs a disservice in advocating the latter in his ongoing effort to rehabilitate the discredited judicial concept of "substantive… |
92 |
Attacking the Truth
Among the many sad signs of our time are the current political and media attacks on Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, for speaking the plain truth on a subject where lies have been the norm for years.
The case before the High Court is whether the use of race as a basis for admitting students to the University of Texas at Austin is a violation… |
93 |
Government Endorses Discrimination for “Diversity’s” Sake
Next week, the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in Fisher v. University of Texas, which once again puts race-conscious college admissions to the constitutional test. With the rationale for racial discrimination dwindling — and understand, discrimination is precisely what the University of Texas has been engaging in &mdash… |
94 |
Courts Hand Obama Administration Two New Judicial Defeats
In 2008, Barack Obama felt the need to reassure skeptical American voters that he would not behave irresponsibly or unilaterally. He would therefore refrain, he promised, from what he characterized as the abusive practice of circumventing the legislative branch by issuing executive orders:
"I taught constitutional law for ten years… |
95 |
The Fuel to America's Fire of Innovation and Prosperity
In an excellent new piece entitled "The U.S. of Awesome: Yep, America Still Leads the World in Innovation and Economic Dynamism," James Pethokoukis of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) highlights how, despite our own regulatory and tax headwinds in the Era of Obama, America continues to outpace the more sclerotic socialist economies… |
96 |
Justice Breyer: American Judges Should Internationalize
Here's an odd, recurring and conspicuous contradiction.
The political left ceaselessly preens its fealty to gauzy multiculturalism, ostentatiously maligning Western, European, Judeo-Christian, ODWM (Old, Dead, White Male) culture in fits of self-flagellation.
Yet whenever it endeavors to uproot American norms it finds objectionable, the… |
97 |
Obama Administration Suffers "Significant Defeat" in Court
This week, a federal judge in Washington, D.C. issued what even The New York Times acknowledged constitutes "a significant defeat for the Obama Administration."
Although liberal partisans immediately struggled to minimize its importance, the Times characterized the ruling as one "that poses a new legal threat to the health care… |
98 |
Execrable ObamaCare Ruling Offers Important Corrective for Conservatives and Libertarians
This week, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy paradoxically discredited a Supreme Court whose legacy and popular standing they appear so desperate to sustain.
In King v. Burwell, they joined the Court's four leftists in preserving federal ObamaCare subsidies despite the law's plain text that only states opting to participate… |
99 |
Second Amendment: Constitutional Rights Shouldn't Be Subject to "Good Cause" Government Approval
Can government officials require American citizens "to demonstrate and elaborate good cause" and "provide supporting documentation" before exercising, say, our First Amendment right to free speech or religious practice?
How about our Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures?
Or our Fifth… |
100 |
IRS Tells Court: We Can Selectively Target Pro-Israel Group
Apparently incapable of shame as its days dwindle, the Obama Administration offered a novel legal theory to the nation's second-highest court this week.
Namely, that its Internal Revenue Service (IRS) can target a pro-Israel nonprofit on the basis of viewpoint.
The underlying facts of the case defy credulity, and are every bit as despicable… |
101 |
Ten Years After Kelo, Supreme Court Can Make Property Rights Course Correction
"...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation." —United States Constitution, Amendment V
Can government confiscate, in the name of regulating prices and market micromanagement, up to half of a farmer's crops without providing just compensation?
The Fifth Amendment seems perfectly… |
102 |
The 'Disparate Impact' Racket
The U.S. Department of Justice issued two reports last week, both growing out of the Ferguson, Missouri shooting of Michael Brown. The first report, about "the shooting death of Michael Brown by Ferguson, Missouri police officer Darren Wilson" ought to be read by every American.
It says in plain English what facts have been established by… |
103 |
Rand Paul Announces Judicial Policy That Should Alarm Conservatives and Libertarians
As his prospective 2016 presidential candidacy congeals, Senator Rand Paul's (R - Kentucky) discordant policy proclamations have so far tended toward the realm of foreign affairs.
In recent remarks before a Heritage audience, however, Paul announced a domestic judicial philosophy that will exacerbate concern among conservatives and libertarians… |
104 |
Why Conservative Lawsuits Aren’t Examples of Judicial Activism
It’s January 2015, and liberal politicians in Washington are already making good on one of their resolutions – frame Republicans as hypocritical on judicial activism.
Congressman Gerald E. Connolly, a Virginia Democrat, got the ball rolling when he said that Republican lawsuits challenging the legality of President Barack Obama’s… |
105 |
Second Amendment Ends 2014 On a High Note
It's important for conservatives and libertarians, preternaturally pessimistic regarding societal drift from constitutional liberty, to acknowledge and savor positive milestones when passed.
In that vein, the year 2014 concluded on a positive note for Second Amendment rights advocates.
First came this December 10 release from the left… |
106 |
Inside the Texas-Led, 20-State Lawsuit Challenging Obama’s Immigration Amnesty
With the additions of Arizona, Florida and Ohio, there are now twenty states suing the Obama administration over the president’s unilateral decision to grant temporary amnesty and work permits to as many as five million illegal immigrants.
The Texas-led lawsuit is a textbook case of Constitutional Litigation 101. Brushing aside any notion that… |
107 |
Is John Roberts Listening to Jonathan Gruber?
Is John Roberts listening to Jonathan Gruber?
In a move that stunned Republicans and Democrats alike two years ago, Roberts, the U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice, changed his mind and single-handedly rewrote ObamaCare in NFIB v. Sebelius to save it from its own unconstitutionality.
A key ingredient in Roberts’ judicial about-face was his ability… |
108 |
Move over Lois Lerner: Lawsuit Says IRS Destroying Evidence in Separate Case
Private lawsuits against the IRS are nothing new, but one claim against the tax-gathering agency should interest House Republicans investigating the possible willful destruction of evidence by former manager Lois Lerner and other employees.
According to federal court documents, the IRS “wiped clean a number of computer hard drives containing… |
109 |
Humiliating New Legal Defeat for Obama Administration, but Rule of Law Remains in the Balance
You don't need a fancy legal degree to understand that Congress intended for every eligible American to have access to tax credits that would lower their healthcare costs, regardless of whether it was state officials or federal officials who were running the marketplace." -White House spokesman Josh Earnest
"It is not our… |
110 |
IRS and the Spoliation of Evidence Legal Standard
“Innocent until proven guilty” is an unconditional canon within our legal system, right?
Not always.
As a first-year associate fresh out of law school, my very first assignment centered on the legal issue known as “spoliation of evidence.” Pronouncing the term correctly (spō-lē-Ā-shŭn)… |
111 |
Don’t Conflate “Affirmative Action” with Alumni, Geographic or Athletic Preferences
“Does the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbid what its text plainly requires? Needless to say (except that this case obliges us to say it), the question answers itself.”
-Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia
Clearly, no moral or political issue has divided and agonized America throughout its history… |
112 |
Second Amendment: Justice Stevens’s Proposed Revision is an Admission of Defeat
If hyper-liberal retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens gets his way, here’s how the Second Amendment would read:
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, when serving in the militia, shall not be infringed.”
Consider it a liberal… |
113 |
From the NAACP to Mozilla: Anonymity and First Amendment Freedom
“Petitioner has made an uncontroverted showing that on past occasions revelation of the identity of its rank-and-file members has exposed these members to economic reprisal, loss of employment, threat of physical coercion, and other manifestations of public hostility. Under these circumstances, we think it apparent that compelled disclosure… |
114 |
Will ObamaCare Die by Self-Implosion or Court Decision? The Race is On
Pop quiz:
The paramount principle that drew America’s first permanent settlers across the Atlantic, and upon which our nation was founded, was:
(a) The freedom to practice one’s religion beyond government interference; or
(b) The right to force private employers to provide birth control and abortive drugs… |
115 |
Gowdy’s ENFORCE Act: Obama’s Last Chance to Avoid Impeachment?
A new proposal by Trey Gowdy seems tailor-made to save Barack Obama from impeachment.
But so far the president isn’t listening.
Gowdy, a Republican, is a former federal prosecutor representing South Carolina’s 4th Congressional District. He is also the author of H.R. 4138, better known as the “Executive Needs to Faithfully Observe… |
116 |
Liberal 9th Circuit: Second Amendment Rights not Limited to One’s Home
One conspicuous casualty of the Obama Administration’s ongoing boondoggle of lawlessness and ideological fiat is something that was once a reliable conservative grievance.
Namely, the increasingly rare complaint of “judicial activism” – properly defined not as overturning democratically enacted statutes that happen to… |
117 |
IRS, Obama Administration Suffer Unanimous New Legal Defeat
In a unanimous decision employing startling but justifiably harsh terms, the nation’s second-highest court handed the Obama Administration and its rogue Internal Revenue Service (IRS) an embarrassing new legal defeat this week:
“If we were to accept the IRS’s interpretation of Section 330, the IRS would be empowered for the… |
118 |
Will the Supreme Court Rein in Obama’s Lawlessness?
History will not be kind to Barack Obama. Once the luster of his personality has receded into the past and his media disciples have all hung up their credentials, the only thing left will be his record. And it’s not pretty.
Even now, with three years left in his tenure, it’s becoming increasingly apparent that his will be a presidency… |
119 |
Federal Court Overturns Yet Another Chicago Gun Law
“Certain fundamental rights are protected by the Constitution, put outside government’s reach, including the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense under the Second Amendment. This right must also include the right to acquire a firearm, although that acquisition right is far from absolute: there are many long-standing… |
120 |
Groundhog Day? IRS Renews Targeting of Libertarian, Conservative Groups
Apparently, the Obama Administration either lacks any sense of irony whatsoever, or it simply maintains no interest in propriety or any appearance thereof.
The latest occasion for that observation comes from a new partisan stunt originating out of Obama’s Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
That’s not a misprint – the same… |
|
Page 4 of 6 |