| |
On the Michael Cohen Investigation: |
|
| |
"Here we go, from Russia with love, to campaign finance with love.
"Why was Michael Cohen investigated? Because the 'Steele dossier' had him making secret trips to meet with Russians that never happened, so his business dealings got a thorough scrubbing and, in the process, he fell into the Paul Manafort bin reserved by the special counsel for squeezing until the juice comes out. We are back to 1998 all over again, with presidents and candidates covering up their alleged marital misdeeds and prosecutors trying to turn legal acts into illegal ones by inventing new crimes.
"The plot to get President Trump out of office thickens, as Cohen obviously was his own mini crime syndicate and decided that his betrayals meant he would be better served turning on his old boss to cut the best deal with prosecutors he could rather than holding out and getting the full Manafort treatment. That was clear the minute he hired attorney Lanny Davis, who does not try cases and did past work for Hillary Clinton. Cohen had recorded his client, trying to entrap him, sold information about Trump to corporations for millions of dollars while acting as his lawyer, and did not pay taxes on millions.
"The sweetener for the prosecutors, of course, was getting Cohen to plead guilty to campaign violations that were not campaign violations. Money paid to people who come out of the woodwork and shake down people under threat of revealing bad sexual stories are not legitimate campaign expenditures. They are personal expenditures. That is true for both candidates we like and candidates we do not. Just imagine if candidates used campaign funds instead of their own money to pay folks like Stormy Daniels to keep quiet about affairs. They would get indicted for misuse of campaign funds for personal purposes and for tax evasion."
Read entire article here. |
|
| |
— Mark Penn, Chairman of Harris Poll and author of “Microtrends Squared”
|
|
|
— Mark Penn, Chairman of Harris Poll and author of “Microtrends Squared”
|
|
Posted August 23, 2018 • 08:20 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Elections Having Consequences: |
|
| |
"Before the election, you'd be hard pressed to find a group of media and political commentators willing to talk about Russia the way they do today.
"In fact, pooh-poohing concerns about Moscow's obvious hostility to the U.S. was all the rage as recently as 2012. It was a great punchline during the presidential debate between then-President Barack Obama and Gov. Mitt Romney.
"Similarly, you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who gave a good damn about Manafort before the 2016 election. That guy has been running scams and engaging in clearly unethical and illegal behavior for years. And it's not like he was a non-entity in political and media circles. Most just didn't care. But now that Trump is president, it's a very serious matter.
"I'm all for getting the crooks. I'm all for rooting them out, one by one. I just wish it didn't take Democrats losing a presidential election for it to happen." |
|
| |
— Becket Adams, The Washington Examiner
|
|
|
— Becket Adams, The Washington Examiner
|
|
Posted August 22, 2018 • 07:38 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Continuing Attacks on Colorado Baker Jack Phillips: |
|
| |
"Liberalism has always struggled to balance the protection of minority rights against majoritarian institutions and -- less often appreciated -- the protection of individual rights. The American Left has liberated itself from such considerations by abandoning liberalism for identity politics and a might-makes-right ethic. Why compel Jack Phillips to knuckle under? Because you can, and because you hate him. Hate is an inescapable part of tribalism, and hate is now the single most important organizing principle of the American Left.
"T. H. White understood this ethic, which he described as the constitution of an ant colony: 'Everything which is not forbidden is compulsory.' To the cranky dissidents such as Jack Phillips, and to the likewise unassimilated nonconformists of our time, we owe a debt of gratitude. If the human ethic survives the ant ethic, it will be in no small part because of them." |
|
| |
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
|
|
|
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
|
|
Posted August 21, 2018 • 08:41 AM
|
|
|
| |
On Surveying the Results of an Anti-Trump Media: |
|
| |
"A Gallup survey three years ago found that 40 percent trusted the media; two years ago, the trust meter declined by 8 points, to 32 percent. Now even that low bar looks like the good old days.
"Yet instead of soberly examining their conduct, most in the media ratchet up the vitriol, apparently believing that screaming louder and longer will lead the public to hate Trump as much as they do.
"But as the surveys show, their bias is a boomerang. With media behavior undermining public trust more than anything Trump says or does, a return to traditional standards of fairness and a separation of news from opinion are essential." |
|
| |
— Michael Goodwin, New York Post
|
|
|
— Michael Goodwin, New York Post
|
|
Posted August 20, 2018 • 08:34 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the GoFund-ing of Peter Strzok: |
|
| |
"Every now and then, I'll read some news that makes my eyes bug out and my jaw drop to the floor because I can't believe how stupid it is.
"This week, it was the news that fired FBI agent Peter Strzok has raised over $400,000 for his legal costs and lost income via a GoFundMe campaign.
"Let me rephrase: Actual people with actual brains actually decided that the best use of their hard-earned cash was to just give it away to this dude. I really can't believe it. I mean, I thought I was bad with money until I saw people were giving theirs to Peter f***ing Strzok. I can spend my money much more wisely than that, and I'm saying that as someone who once spent $20 to have a single Slurpee delivered to her apartment so she didn't have to go outside.
"Personally, I am someone who believes that Strzok should have been fired sooner. His job demanded that he remain unbiased, and we have text-message proof that he was not. We have text-message proof of him literally saying he wanted to take Donald Trump down. It's also not like Strzok has lived his life in a way that would make him a particularly sympathetic figure. After all, on top of him being bad at his job, it seems that he was also pretty bad at being a husband. Like, I may not know a ton about marriage (I am single and live alone with a cat), but I do know that the people we call 'good husbands' are generally ones that don't cheat on their wives. I do know that much!"
Read entire article here. |
|
| |
— Katherine Timpf, National Review Online
|
|
|
— Katherine Timpf, National Review Online
|
|
Posted August 17, 2018 • 08:11 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Schooling of Turkish President Erdogan: |
|
| |
"Recep Tayyip Erdogan is learning a lesson that history has taught, sometimes harshly, to many men of his kind in the past: Tyrants have power, but markets have more power.
"If you are a tyrant, you can declare a 'state of emergency' to give yourself special powers. Indira Gandhi did it to crack down on political opponents in 1975, and Pervez Musharraf did it for the same reason in 2007. At the close of the Cold War, KGB boss Vladimir Kryuchkov tried to do it to reverse perestroika. And President Erdogan did it to consolidate his political power. What he did with his expanded powers was predictable: He dismissed more than 100,000 public officials who did not support him politically; he shut down critical newspapers and media outlets, along with troublesome schools, charities, and civil-society groups, seizing their assets without compensation. He arrested 50,000 people on trumped-up terrorism charges and held many without trial. He seized the passports of dissidents and froze their bank accounts.
"But capital in the 21st century is slippery. It is restless, and it will not sit still for abuse. It is difficult to seize. The iron fist of tyranny is no good against 21st-century capital, which slips between the tyrant's grubby little fingers like water. Turkey's currency, the lira, lost half its value as the world's investors discovered themselves having second thoughts about exposing themselves to the caprices of a vicious autocrat. Erdogan, for all his sultanic pretense, is nearly defenseless against the power of simple preference. ...
"Erdogan can lock up dissidents and shut down newspapers. But he can't lock up the markets, and the markets are no longer buying what he's selling." |
|
| |
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
|
|
|
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
|
|
Posted August 16, 2018 • 08:15 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the West Virginia Supreme Court: |
|
| |
"West Virginia Supreme Court Justice Robin Jean Davis announced her resignation early Tuesday, just hours after the state House of Delegates adopted articles of impeachment against every justice serving on the court. ...
"Davis and three of her colleagues were impeached in the state legislature late Monday. Chief Justice Margaret Workman and Justices Allen Loughry and Elizabeth Walker will now stand trial in the state senate. The fifth member of the court, Menis Ketchum, resigned on July 27. He is expected to plead guilty to two corruption charges in federal court on Aug. 29.
"The impeachment articles allege the justices failed to effectively administer the state courts, approved compensation for senior judges in excess of statutory limits, and abused state resources through lavish renovations to their chambers and unauthorized use of state vehicles for personal travel.
"GOP Gov. Jim Justice will appoint successors to any justice removed from office following the Senate trial.
"Local media and state auditors discovered the justices cumulatively spent over $1 million on furniture and aesthetic upgrades for their state offices -- Davis spent some $500,000, according to the impeachment articles, including $23,000 for design services and $20,000 for a sectional carpet."
Read entire article here. |
|
| |
— Kevin J. Daley, The Daily Caller
|
|
|
— Kevin J. Daley, The Daily Caller
|
|
Posted August 15, 2018 • 08:00 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the FBI's Firing of Peter Strzok: |
|
| |
"Good riddance to bad rubbish.
"The FBI has finally fired Peter Strzok, the former senior counterintelligence official whose anti-Trump texts have compromised the bureau's investigations of Hillary Clinton's unauthorized State Department email server and Russia's alleged interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
"Media responded Monday by questioning whether the White House influenced the decision.
"How about another question: What does a fed have to do to get fired in this city?
"Strzok, who oversaw both the Clinton and Russia investigations, was a toxic employee; his stupidity matched only by his hubris. The bureau should've fired him long before the president weighed in on the issue." |
|
| |
— Becket Adams, Washington Examiner
|
|
|
— Becket Adams, Washington Examiner
|
|
Posted August 14, 2018 • 08:16 AM
|
|
|
| |
On the Left, the Right and Identity Politics: |
|
| |
"Sen. Kamala Harris, a California Democrat and 2020 White House hopeful, delivered a speech last week celebrating the widespread use of 'identity politics' that Democrats hope to use to win back the House and Senate.
"'Identity politics' is the tactic of dividing people into 'identity' groups such as black, white, Hispanic, Asian, female, Muslim or whatever. Once divided into their various labeled train cars, the voters in each car are fed a political message tailored to their specific race, religion or gender.
"In the good old days, there was another term for this. It was called 'racism.' And good people everywhere in civilized society rejected it.
"Of course the media is too absorbed covering the latest irrelevant Klan rally to give the appropriate attention to a sitting United States senator publicly defending racist political tactics on her march to the White House.
"Maybe Facebook will shut down her website. But I wouldn't bet on it." |
|
| |
— Charles Hurt, The Washington Times
|
|
|
— Charles Hurt, The Washington Times
|
|
Posted August 13, 2018 • 07:54 AM
|
|
|
| |
On IRS Settlement With Tea Party Groups: |
|
| |
"A judge late Wednesday signed off on the settlement between the IRS and hundreds of tea party groups, closing out the last major legal battle over what all sides now agree was unwarranted and illegal targeting for political purposes.
"The IRS agreed to pay $3.5 million to groups that were wronged by the intrusive inspections, and insists it's made changes so that political targeting can't occur in the future.
"A few issues are still being fought over in the courts -- including whether former IRS senior executive Lois G. Lerner will be allowed to forever shield her deposition explaining her behavior from public view, and whether the IRS should pay attorney fees -- but this week's decision closes out five years of litigation over the targeting itself." |
|
| |
— Stephen Dinan, The Washington Times
|
|
|
— Stephen Dinan, The Washington Times
|
|
Posted August 10, 2018 • 08:38 AM
|
|
|
|