America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
So-Called "Railway Safety Act" Constitutes a Political Handout to Big Labor That Does Nothing to Improve Safety At All

America as we know it was built largely upon and because of our rail industry, and today it remains a pillar of our economy.

Unfortunately, a destructive proposal before Congress misleadingly named the "Railway Safety Act" (RSA), part of broader surface transportation reauthorization, threatens great harm to our railroads.

Simply put, the bill has nothing to do with improving safety, but has a lot to do with advancing the political agenda of Big Labor.  At a moment when inflation burdens American families and fragile supply chains remain vulnerable to disruption, the last thing our economy or rail sector need is another costly federal mandate imposed upon one of the nation’s most important transportation sectors.

As an initial matter, as noted by The Wall Street Journal, the…[more]

May 20, 2026 • 04:28 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On Bringing Charges Against HRC:
 
 

"FBI chief James Comey and his investigators are increasingly certain presidential nominee Hillary Clinton violated laws in handling classified government information through her private e-mail server, career agents say.

"Some expect him to push for charges, but he faces a formidable obstacle: the political types in the Obama White House who view a Clinton presidency as a third Obama term.

"With that, agents have been spreading the word, largely through associates in the private sector, that their boss is getting stonewalled, despite uncovering compelling evidence Clinton broke the law."

 
 
— Charles Gasparino, Fox Business Senior Correspondent
— Charles Gasparino, Fox Business Senior Correspondent
Posted March 21, 2016 • 07:51 AM
 
 
On the SCOTUS Game of Thrones:
 
 

"It should be no surprise that when we bequeath monarchical powers to nine -- or eight -- lawyers, the battle for succession to one of the nine thrones will be ugly. Indeed, it's surprising it's not uglier. We spend billions of dollars trying to pick a president of the United States, and in many respects the Supreme Court is now more powerful than the presidency. It's certainly far, far, far less democratic. We appoint justices for life and many of their decisions cannot be overturned by the Congress, or the people, short of a constitutional convention.

"The left, which pays a lot of lip-service to the 'people power' and democratic action, has given us these black-robed kings and queens. They shouldn't be surprised when the game of thrones gets ugly. It's their game."

 
 
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
— Jonah Goldberg, National Review Online Editor-at-Large
Posted March 18, 2016 • 08:16 AM
 
 
On 'Moderate' SCOTUS Nominee Merrick Garland:
 
 

"Conservatives should not accept an extreme left-wing judicial activist. They should not accept an extreme right-wing judicial activist, if there were such a thing. They should not accept a moderate judicial activist, for the same reason that they would not shoot themselves in the foot with a firearm of moderate caliber. Litmus tests may be in bad odor with our self-proclaimed sophisticates, but here one is very much in order: The law is the law is the law, and it isn't anything else. Those who believe otherwise do not belong on the Supreme Court any more than moderate phrenologists belong on medical-school faculties or moderate foxes should be assigned guard duty at the henhouse.

"If the best that can be said of Garland is that he would do only moderate violence to the Constitution, then that is a complete and whole case against confirming him, or even considering his confirmation."

 
 
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
Posted March 17, 2016 • 07:48 AM
 
 
On Hillary Clinton's March 15th Five-State Sweep:
 
 

"What a difference a week makes.

"Last Tuesday, Bernie Sanders's stunning victory in the Michigan primary upended the Democratic establishment's expectations and placed Hillary Clinton's inevitable ascendancy on hold.

"But the established order reasserted itself on Tuesday night -- this time, probably for good. Clinton laid a goose egg on Sanders, winning five out of five contests across a diverse swath of America and permanently putting to rest her rival's contention that she's a 'regional candidate' who struggles outside the South. Though the Sanders campaign shows no signs of quitting the race anytime soon, the Vermont senator's empty-handed finish seems to augur the beginning of the end for his 'political revolution.'"

 
 
— Brendan Bordelon, National Review
— Brendan Bordelon, National Review
Posted March 16, 2016 • 07:57 AM
 
 
On Genocide of Christians by ISIS:
 
 

"It's not often that life gives you a second chance (or a third, or a fourth). But that's exactly what Congress did today for President Obama when the House passed a resolution applying the word 'genocide' to ISIS's atrocities against Christians in the Middle East. The decision presents President Obama with a picture-perfect opportunity to do something bold, decisive, and morally right in foreign policy, and to help restore his tarnished legacy. This opportunity is probably his last. ...

"For more than seven years, President Obama's foreign policy has been a toxic blend of strong language and weak action. (Remember the 'red line' in Syria? Neither does Assad.) The foreign policy of the Obama administration tends toward talking a big game and then conveniently forgetting to show up. That would be a lot harder to pull off if he called the genocide of Christians by ISIS what it is. So naturally he's avoiding it, like the Clinton administration before him. ...

"Congress has spoken. Obviously, President Obama feels that he is under no obligation to consider Congress's opinion on pretty much anything, but this time he should think long and hard and not ignore it. If his secretary of state, John Kerry, agrees to designate ISIS's atrocities genocide, that could force the administration to act with the European Union to take military action against ISIS soon. President Obama may want to avoid that policy, but his failure to confront the genocide and name it would be the nail in the coffin of his foreign-policy legacy. If the 20th century taught us anything, it's that ignoring genocide doesn't make it go away. If we won't call it what it is, our children will do it for us, and we'll have to answer the difficult question of why we wouldn't do it ourselves."

 
 
— Jane Clark Scharl, National Review
— Jane Clark Scharl, National Review
Posted March 15, 2016 • 07:57 AM
 
 
On Adopting a Common-Sense Immigration Approach:
 
 

"If the border were to be closed, if immigration laws were enforced, if there were some reduction in legal immigration, if entry were to be meritocratic, if we reverted to the melting-pot ideal of assimilation, if we cut -studies courses and jettisoned therapy and ideology for hard science, math, and English language, in just two decades one's particular ancestry would become irrelevant ... In other words, things would work out fine.

"But that is certainly not the wish of the present culture or the direction that this rather sick society is headed."

 
 
— Victor Davis Hansen, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
— Victor Davis Hansen, Hoover Institution Senior Fellow and Nationally Syndicated Columnist
Posted March 14, 2016 • 07:54 AM
 
 
On Obama’s Supreme Court Finalists:
 
 

"The White House has reportedly narrowed its list of potential Supreme Court nominees down to five people, and four of them have donated to Barack Obama's political campaigns.

"The five federal judges who will be interviewed by the White House for the nomination are federal judges Sri Srinivasan (who has donated $4,250 to Obama), Jane Kelly ($1,500 to Obama), Paul Watford ($1,000 to Obama), Ketanji Brown Jackson ($450 to Obama), and Merrick Garland, who has not donated to Obama."

 
 
— Brent Scher, Washington Free Beacon
— Brent Scher, Washington Free Beacon
Posted March 11, 2016 • 07:43 AM
 
 
On HRC Investigation Speculation:
 
 

"Department of Justice officials have impaneled a federal grand jury in the Hillary Clinton email case and FBI agents have launched a second, separate investigation on political corruption involving the former secretary of state'€™s official activities and the Clinton Foundation, a former U.S. attorney told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

"Joseph E. diGenova, who served as U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia for four years, said Wednesday he believes the FBI is investigating two separate Clinton scandals.

'"The Bureau has between 100 and 150 agents assigned to the case. They would not have that many people assigned to a classified information case,' he told TheDCNF, addressing Clinton's use of a private email server located at her New York home."

 
 
— Richard Pollock, The Daily Caller
— Richard Pollock, The Daily Caller
Posted March 10, 2016 • 01:24 PM
 
 
On Hillary's Federal Education Squad:
 
 

"Brace yourselves, parents: Hillary Clinton's Fed Ed jackboot squad is from the government and is here to 'help.'

"Clinton wants a cadre of new government educrats to undo the decades-old damage of old government educrats in America's worst public schools. She pitched her creepy proposal at the Democratic presidential debate in Michigan on Sunday for an 'education SWAT team' to swarm down and rescue students from failing districts in decrepit cities such as Detroit (run by whom? Oh, yeah. Democrats!). ...

"Detroit's schools, swimming in $3.5 billion of accumulated debt, face bankruptcy in April. The district is now under FBI investigation for a vendor kickback scheme involving the very kind of 'experts' -- entrenched teachers, self-serving principals, and profligate school officials -- whom Clinton would enlist to rescue the schools they are guilty of plundering.

"It's government SWAT team business as usual: Destroying the village to 'save' it."

Read whole piece here

 
 
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
— Michelle Malkin, Syndicated Columnist
Posted March 09, 2016 • 01:08 PM
 
 
On the Democrats' Debate Decorum:
 
 

"It was the 'excuse me' that echoed around Democratic politics.

"In their intense Flint, Mich., debate, Bernie Sanders pointedly said to Hillary Clinton in the heat of one exchange, 'Excuse me, I'm talking.'

"Sanders has an $18 trillion unicorns-dancing-on-rainbows spending program and a paranoiac's view of Wall Street, but nothing is quite as disqualifying for the feminist Left as his alleged 'condescension' in this moment and a couple of others (in two other instances, he asked if he could finish, please).

"As far as decorum goes, the Clinton-€“Sanders spat was like a dispute over what dinner fork to use at a four-course meal at the Four Seasons compared with the food fights during the Republican forums. It takes a primatologist to try to unravel the dynamics at a GOP debate, whereas the Democratic debates are being scored by the kind of people who worry about microaggressions and need ready access to safe spaces."

 
 
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
— Rich Lowry, National Review Editor
Posted March 08, 2016 • 01:21 PM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"America's largest cities are increasing their spending at almost unprecedented rates.A RealClearInvestigations analysis of cities with at least 500,000 residents found they cumulatively raised their per-person spending by 18% over the last 10 budget cycles, accounting for inflation. The only equivalents on record are the spending surges ignited by the Great Society programs of the 1960s and Franklin…[more]
 
 
— Jeremy Portnoy, RealClearInvestigations
 
Liberty Poll   

Do you believe the Federal Reserve made the correct decision this week to leave interest rates unchanged for now?