Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there'…
CFIF on X CFIF on YouTube
Inflation: Comparing Trump and Biden...

Democrats hope to press the "affordability" issue in this year's midterm election season, but there's one potentially glaring problem for them, as illustrated by our friends at Unleash Prosperity...

[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="668"] Biden Versus Trump on Inflation[/caption]

 …[more]

August 17, 2026 • 04:40 PM
Notable Quotes
 
On Obama's Negotiations with Iran:
 
 

"So, here's my own seditious foray into interfering with the conduct of US foreign policy:

'To Whom It May Concern in Tehran,
You're unlikely to ever encounter someone this weak and credulous again in the Oval Office.'"

 
 
— Rich Lowry, New York Post
— Rich Lowry, New York Post
Posted March 13, 2015 • 11:47 AM
 
 
On Loyal Opposition and Patriotic Dissent:
 
 

"President Obama's powers never cease to amaze. He has made it suddenly fashionable to question others' patriotism for dissenting on foreign policy, and has turned the Democrats -- yes, the Democrats -- into a presidential guard who respond with unthinking fury to skepticism about their leader's claims to ever-expanding executive power. ...

"During the Bush administration, none other than Hillary Clinton angrily lamented: 'I'm sick and tired of people who say that if you debate and disagree with this administration, somehow you're not patriotic. We need to stand up and say we're Americans, and we have the right to debate and disagree with any administration.'

"We agree. The notion that Congress has a patriotic duty to be seen but not heard on Iran is absurd. But it serves at least one purpose, as it illustrates the hypocrisy of those who once proclaimed dissent to be patriotic."

 
 
— The Editors, The Washington Examiner
— The Editors, The Washington Examiner
Posted March 12, 2015 • 12:13 PM
 
 
On Hillary Clinton's Refusing Access to Her Personal Email Server:
 
 

"'Trust me, I'm a Clinton'. This is part of a decades-old pattern: For all their strengths, Hillary and Bill Clinton have a weakness for victimization, entitlement, and their unbounded belief that the ends justify the means.

"Rules are for little people, not them.

"She had a choice -- the right way or the wrong way, the new way or the old way. She chose to turn back the clock to the 1990s, when her husband's White House overcame its wrongdoing by denying the truth, blaming Republicans, and demonizing and bullying the media."

 
 
— Ron Fournier, National Journal
— Ron Fournier, National Journal
Posted March 11, 2015 • 12:24 PM
 
 
On National Right to Work Legislation:
 
 

"We are halfway there: On Friday, the state assembly of Wisconsin voted to make the state the 25th to pass right-to-work legislation ... That'€™s 25 down, 25 to go. ...

"Right-to-work laws end the practice of union bosses' enriching their organizations through a legal variety of extortion under which all workers are required to pay the equivalent of union dues, whether they wish to be represented by a particular union or do not. ...

"In 2015, there is one effective way to increase workers' power at the bargaining table: a growing economy with a hungry demand for workers. Self-serving union bosses have for too long stood in the way of achieving that. Wisconsin and 24 other states have taken a step in the right direction on the latter issue -- achieving the former will require a national effort."

 
 
— The Editors, National Review
— The Editors, National Review
Posted March 10, 2015 • 12:09 PM
 
 
On Bringing Back the Clintons:
 
 

"If you treat IRS rules the way the IRS treats IRS rules, you go to prison; if you treat federal law the way the secretary of state does, you go to prison. If you treat immigration controls the way our immigration authorities do, you go to prison. If you'€™re as careless in your handling of firearms as the ATF is, you go to prison. You cook your business'€™s books the way the federal government cooks its books, you go to prison.

"Hillary Clinton is not going to prison. She's going to release whatever emails she feels like releasing and dare any of you peons or your elected representatives to try to make her do otherwise. You'€™ll take what she offers, and you'€™ll like it. ...

"A self-respecting people would have sent this clan of scrofulous grifters and po-faced con artists into whatever passes for exile (comfortable exile, of course) in the 21st century. Instead, we are giving them a serious shot at a return to the White House.

"At least this time, we'll know to keep an eye on the silver."

 
 
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
— Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
Posted March 09, 2015 • 12:47 PM
 
 
On Obama's Negotiations with Iran:
 
 

"For six years, Obama has offered the mullahs an extended hand. He has imagined that with Kissingerian brilliance he would turn the Khamenei regime into a de facto U.S. ally in pacifying the Middle East. For his pains, Obama has been rewarded with an Iran that has ramped up its aggressiveness in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and Yemen, and brazenly defied the world on uranium enrichment.

"He did the same with Russia. He offered Vladimir Putin a new detente. 'Reset,' he called it. Putin responded by decimating his domestic opposition, unleashing a vicious anti-American propaganda campaign, ravaging Ukraine and shaking the post-Cold War European order to its foundations.

"Like the Bourbons, however, Obama learns nothing. He persists in believing that Iran's radical Islamist regime can be turned by sweet reason and fine parchment into a force for stability. It's akin to his refusal to face the true nature of the Islamic State, Iran's Sunni counterpart. He simply can't believe that such people actually believe what they say."

 
 
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
— Charles Krauthammer, Syndicated Columnist
Posted March 06, 2015 • 01:34 PM
 
 
On the Rules According to Clinton:
 
 

"Hillary Clinton hasn't even begun her expected presidential candidacy, but already Americans are being reminded of the political entertainment they can expect. To wit, the normal rules of government ethics and transparency apply to everyone except Bill and Hillary. ...

"The real story here is that none of this is a surprise. This is how the Clintons roll. They're a political version of the old Peanuts cartoon character who was always surrounded by a cloud of dirt. Ethical shortcuts and controversies are standard operating procedure. A brief 1990s roll call: The Riadys, Johnny Chung, Travelgate, the vanishing Rose billing records, a killing in cattle futures, the Marc Rich pardon.

"The Clintons and Democrats want Americans to forget all of that. But as the email and foundation discoveries show, the Clintons haven't changed. They still think they can do what they please and get away with it."

 
 
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
— The Editors, The Wall Street Journal
Posted March 05, 2015 • 01:14 PM
 
 
On the President's Negotiations with Iran:
 
 

"Barack Obama wants us all to simmer down about Iran. He wants Senator Bob Menendez, a fellow Democrat, and the donors he represents to butt out of the sanctions debate. He wants Republicans to quit crying wolf about Iran's nuclear weapons program. He wants the media to stop hyping terror threats. He wants the American people in the dark about the secret correspondence he's had for years with Iran's supreme leader. He wants John Boehner to be mindful of protocol. And most of all, he wants Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop questioning his accommodationist approach to Tehran.

"With the breezy confidence that is his trademark, the president has repeatedly delivered a reassuring message on Iran to the country and the world: Trust me.

"With respect, Mr. President: No."

 
 
— Stephen F. Hayes, The Weekly Standard
— Stephen F. Hayes, The Weekly Standard
Posted March 04, 2015 • 01:12 PM
 
 
On Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's Lack of Transparency:
 
 

"Hillary Clinton's lack of transparency is newsworthy as investigators attempt to ascertain her work around the time of the September 11, 2012, terrorist attack in Benghazi. Certainly the media could stay quite busy investigating how Clinton communicated with her colleagues and the White House, how secure her email communications were, whether they were hacked, who was privy to this law-breaking (or 'rule-breaking' in the parlance of the media), and assorted other questions. For instance, was it a GMail account? Did she get targeted ads based on the content of possibly top secret emails? Were classified documents sent to this email address? Did that violate any other laws? What, exactly, was she trying to hide? What Benghazi information, if any, was hidden by this workaround? How do we know?...

"The bottom line, though, is that this story couldn't be more vintage Clinton if it tried. Some people have fond memories of the Clintons but that's mostly because they've repressed all the memories of the constant idiotic scandals they dragged the country through -- all while protesting that a Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy was to blame."

 
 
— Mollie Ziegler Hemingway, The Federalist Senior Editor
— Mollie Ziegler Hemingway, The Federalist Senior Editor
Posted March 03, 2015 • 12:53 PM
 
 
On PM Netanyahu's Address to Congress and the American People:
 
 

"When Netanyahu walks to the podium of the House of Representatives on March 3, he'll undoubtedly have in mind an earlier speech given by a foreign leader to a joint meeting of Congress. On December 26, 1941, Winston Churchill addressed Congress, though in the smaller Senate Chamber rather than in the House, as so many members were out of town for Christmas break.

"Churchill enjoyed the great advantage in December 1941 of having an American president who, after Pearl Harbor, was a clear and unambiguous ally in the war for the West. Netanyahu has no such advantage. So it might be hard for him to say, as Churchill did, that here in Washington he had 'found an Olympian fortitude which, far from being based upon complacency, is only the mask of an inflexible purpose and the proof of a sure, well-grounded confidence in the final outcome.'

"But Netanyahu won'€™t be speaking only to the Obama administration, which has, after all, made clear its lack of interest in listening to Netanyahu and whose allies won't be there to listen. He'll be speaking to the American people."

 
 
— William Kristol, The Weekly Standard Editor
— William Kristol, The Weekly Standard Editor
Posted March 02, 2015 • 01:06 PM
 
Notable Quote   
 
"Without labor, nothing prospers."…[more]
 
 
— Sophocles, Ancient Greek Playwright
 
Liberty Poll   

As everyday American politics approach "daggers at dawn; press conference to follow" territory, do you want to engage more or less?