In last week's Liberty Update, we highlighted the Heritage Foundation's 2022 Index of Economic Freedom…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
Image of the Day: More Economic Freedom = Higher Standard of Living

In last week's Liberty Update, we highlighted the Heritage Foundation's 2022 Index of Economic Freedom, which shows that Joe Biden has dragged the U.S. down to 22nd, our lowest rank ever (we placed 4th in the first Index in 1995, and climbed back up from 18th to 12th under President Trump).  As we noted, among the Index's invaluable metrics is how it demonstrates the objective correlation between more economic freedom and higher citizen standards of living, which this graphic illustrates:

 …[more]

May 19, 2022 • 12:53 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Voters Get to Choose Envy or Growth Print
By Betsy McCaughey
Wednesday, August 10 2016
Slashing the corporate tax rate is the fastest way to increase American competitiveness.

On Monday, Donald Trump stopped the wisecracks and laid out a serious plan to jumpstart the nation's limping economy. He proposed tax cuts, regulatory relief, unfettered development of coal, oil and natural gas and fairer trade pacts. One item in his plan will do more than all the others to get the nation working again: cutting corporate taxes. Trump pledged, "Under my plan, no American company will pay more than 15 percent of their business income in taxes."

Immediately, Hillary Clinton pounced on Trump's "tax breaks (for) large corporations." Her classic warfare rhetoric reminds us that in this election voters have to decide between Clinton's politics of envy or Trump's agenda of economic growth for all.

First, the facts: The U.S. corporate tax rate is 35 percent  the highest in the developed world. Even with deductions, companies here pay on average 27 percent, which is more than in most other countries. Since 2000, nearly every industrialized country has cut corporate taxes to compete for business  except the U.S.

Consider Ireland. It's not just shamrocks making that country green. Money's been pouring in from around the globe, since Ireland slashed its corporate tax rate to 12.5 percent, one of the lowest in Europe. In 2015, the country's economy grew three times as fast as the United States. Companies from the U.S. and across Europe hurried to set up operations there.

Closer to home, Canadians of all political stripes  liberals, conservatives and progressives  put their ideological differences aside and agreed to lower the country's corporate tax rate from 42 percent to 26 percent. They decided that fighting over a bigger economic pie beat arguing over how to divvy up a smaller one.

Now the Brits, rocked by Brexit, are preparing to lower corporate taxes, knowing it's the fastest, most effective way to compete with the European Union.

But Clinton is stuck in the past. American corporate tax rates haven't changed since her husband was president. Her business plan, which she will unveil in Detroit on Thursday, actually hikes business taxes. She's obsessed with making corporations pay "their fair share."

As Trump pointed out Monday, "the one common feature of every Hillary Clinton idea is that it punishes you for working and doing business in the United States."

Clinton advisor Neera Tanden says it's unnecessary to reduce corporate taxes because "the U.S. has been doing pretty well when it comes to competitiveness." Huh? Indonesia, Spain, Poland, India and China, to name a few, are growing several times as fast as America's anemic 1.2 percent growth.

Slashing the corporate tax rate is the fastest way to increase American competitiveness. Corporate taxes produce about 10 percent of federal revenue but have an oversized impact on business investment.

And the sooner the better. The U.S. could well be slipping into a recession, warns economist Larry Kudlow. Business investment has dropped during each of the last three quarters, a dangerous sign. Businesses that don't invest in more trucks and computers can't hire more drivers and office personnel. Though the jobs report announced last Friday was hailed as a positive, declining investment makes future job growth shaky.

In the "Fair Growth" plan Clinton is set to unveil, there is no private sector growth. Nothing in her plan will promote business investment, according to Moody's.

Her plan amounts to a $275 billion public works program  a throwback to the 1930s  paid for by more business taxes. As we learned then, and endured again with Obama's failed "shovel-ready" boondoggles, government can't spend its way to prosperity.

Nothing demonstrates Clinton's incapacity to produce economic growth more vividly than her sorry record as New York's Senator. Running in 2000 for that job, she boasted that she would bring 200,000 jobs to the economically destitute upstate region. In fact, during her tenure, upstate job growth stagnated and manufacturing jobs plummeted 24 percent. A grim warning of what the nation can expect from a Hillary Clinton presidency.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Betsy McCaughey is chairman of the Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths and a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research and author of "Government by Choice: Inventing the United States Constitution."
COPYRIGHT © 2016 CREATORS.COM

Quiz Question   
How many days does it take the average U.S. household to consume as much electrical power as one single bitcoin transaction?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"The trial of former Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann crossed a critical threshold Friday when a key witness uttered the name 'Hillary Clinton' in conjunction with a plan to spread the false Alfa Bank Russian collusion claim before the 2016 presidential election.For Democrats and many in the media, Hillary Clinton has long held a Voldemort-like status as 'She who must not be named' in scandals…[more]
 
 
—Jonathan Turley, Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
— Jonathan Turley, Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
 
Liberty Poll   

Should any U.S. government agency have a function called the "Disinformation Governance Board" (See Homeland Security, Department of)?