We at CFIF often highlight the clear and present danger that drug price control schemes pose to American…
CFIF on Twitter CFIF on YouTube
New Lung Cancer Breakthrough Illustrates the Potential Peril of Drug Price Controls

We at CFIF often highlight the clear and present danger that drug price control schemes pose to American consumers, who benefit from our private pharmaceutical sector that leads the world - by far - in innovation.  A new lung cancer treatment breakthrough in the form of Amgen's Lumakras illustrates that interrelationship.

Simply put, Lumakras reduced the risk of progression by 34% compared to chemotherapy in patents with advanced lung cancer, which is particularly welcome considering lung cancer's especially low survival rate (18.6% over five years, and just 5% for advanced forms).  The breakthrough required years of research and enormous amounts of investment, however, which The Wall Street Journal notes makes Lumakras the type of innovation put at risk by new drug price controls…[more]

September 22, 2022 • 05:06 PM

Liberty Update

CFIFs latest news, commentary and alerts delivered to your inbox.
Jester's Courtroom Legal tales stranger than stranger than fiction: Ridiculous and sometimes funny lawsuits plaguing our courts
Harriet Hageman: How I Beat Liz Cheney Print
By Byron York
Wednesday, September 07 2022
So Hageman won. Now what? A conversation with her reveals the depths of her feelings about her home state, especially its natural resources, and a broad suspicion about the motives and competence of federal regulatory agencies that routinely tell Wyomingites how to use those resources.

Harriet Hageman is the environmental lawyer who defeated incumbent Rep. Liz Cheney by a landslide in Wyoming's much-watched Republican House primary. Hageman, who will surely trounce token Democratic opposition in the general election, is now getting ready to take office. She was in Washington last week  not for that preparation, but to argue in a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency over its disastrous actions causing the Gold King Mine disaster in Colorado in 2015. That's the kind of thing she does in her life as a lawyer.

While in Washington, Hageman sat down for an interview about the race against Cheney  how she won, what it means, and what she plans to do when she takes office.

How did she beat Cheney? Two reasons. "One is, I'm a good candidate, and I'm going to be a good member of Congress," Hageman said. The other was: Hageman ran a race centered on Wyoming. She discussed her 30-plus years as an attorney working on "water and natural resources issues, property rights, constitutional rights," representing the state's ranchers, farmers, energy producers and more. "I have been fighting for Wyoming," Hageman said. "I wasn't just running against Liz Cheney, which I think is what some people, especially back in D.C., might think. I was running for Wyoming. I was running to address the issues that are important to us." That's how to win in Wyoming.

Cheney's biggest problem, as Hageman saw it, was that many voters believed she had become disconnected from Wyoming. Cheney was seldom in the state, Hageman said, and "never answered for her votes, never answered for the decisions she made." Cheney, Hageman concluded, "simply abandoned Wyoming, [and] I think what it exposed was that she had used Wyoming for the last six years as a mechanism to get power, but she didn't actually represent Wyoming's interests."

That's how you lose races, when voters become convinced that you have gone Washington, that you are focused inside the Beltway, that you have forgotten the people who sent you there.

So Hageman won. Now what? A conversation with her reveals the depths of her feelings about her home state, especially its natural resources, and a broad suspicion about the motives and competence of federal regulatory agencies that routinely tell Wyomingites how to use those resources.

The state is the largest producer of coal in the nation  more than three times as much as West Virginia and six times as much as Pennsylvania  and one of the largest producers of oil and natural gas. It has huge deposits of uranium and is a major cattle producer. Hageman likes to say that Wyoming puts food on your table, gas in your car, a roof over your head, and it paves your highways, too. The problem is, a lot of people involved in those industries  coal, oil and gas, mining, beef  feel under attack from the Democratic administration and the liberal activist groups that support the administration. They feel that way, of course, because they are under attack. "Wyoming is one of the largest targets of the Biden administration in terms of attempting to destroy our economy," Hageman says.

So her goal in Congress is to stop that, or at least fight back. Ask her for specifics, and she goes into detail not just about coal and oil and gas, but about things like the "Roadless Rule," by which the government bans timber cutting and most other uses of federal land. (Forty-eight percent of Wyoming's land is owned by the federal government.) She speaks at length about BLM, by which she means not Black Lives Matter but the federal Bureau of Land Management. She can discuss in great detail the issue of RFID ear tags  devices that federal regulators want to require for every head of cattle in Wyoming.

These are not flashy, sexy issues that attract news coverage in Washington, which has instead been consumed by the made-for-TV episodes of Cheney's Jan. 6 committee. But they are issues about which many Wyomingites have strong feelings.

For years, Hageman has given a speech she calls "Regulation Without Representation." Congress has abdicated its lawmaking role to the federal regulatory agencies, she says. It is time to cut down and pull back those agencies' power and reach, and have Congress return to its proper role of making laws that are then enforced by the executive branch. It's a classic conservative critique of the regulatory state and government overreach. And that is a very popular view in, among other places, Wyoming.

Harriet Hageman talked about it a lot in the recent campaign. Liz Cheney talked about Jan. 6. As for Hageman and Donald Trump, she certainly benefited from the former president's endorsement. The last time the two talked was the day after the election  "He was pretty happy," Hageman says. Asked if she wants Trump to run for president in 2024  remember that he won Wyoming with 70% of the vote in 2020  Hageman said, "If he chooses to do that, I would support him." Asked again if she wants that to happen, she said, "I miss President Trump. His policies were really incredible for the United States, and they were especially incredible for Wyoming."

Those are obviously controversial comments outside the 70% of Wyomingites who voted for Trump. But Hageman saw, and sees, Trump in terms of issues, not controversy. She recalled that when she first met and talked to Trump when he was president, they talked about regulatory reform and energy independence. Those were, of course, two big priorities of the Trump administration, and they are two big priorities, probably the biggest priorities, of Harriet Hageman the lawyer, congressional candidate and, come next year, Wyoming's next member of the House of Representatives.


Byron York is chief political correspondent for The Washington Examiner

 COPYRIGHT 2022 BYRON YORK 

Quiz Question   
Which one of the following U.S. Presidents signed the executive order establishing the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)?
More Questions
Notable Quote   
 
"The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) sent over $1.1 billion in child tax credit payments to incorrect recipients during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to an audit by the Department of the Treasury's Inspector General (IG) for Tax Administration on Tuesday.The IRS sent the payments to 1.5 million people between July and November of 2021 during the pandemic, according to the audit. Additionally, the…[more]
 
 
—Arjun Singh, The Daily Caller News Foundation
— Arjun Singh, The Daily Caller News Foundation
 
Liberty Poll   

Choosing from the list below, what issue is currently most important to you heading into the mid-term elections?